提交 b13ce4bb 编写于 作者: D Dan Carpenter 提交者: Steve French

cifs: small variable name cleanup

server and ses->server are the same, but it's a little bit ugly that we
lock &ses->server->srv_mutex and unlock &server->srv_mutex.  It causes
a false positive in Smatch about inconsistent locking.
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
上级 efb79f28
......@@ -3836,7 +3836,7 @@ cifs_setup_session(const unsigned int xid, struct cifs_ses *ses,
if (rc) {
cifs_dbg(VFS, "Send error in SessSetup = %d\n", rc);
} else {
mutex_lock(&ses->server->srv_mutex);
mutex_lock(&server->srv_mutex);
if (!server->session_estab) {
server->session_key.response = ses->auth_key.response;
server->session_key.len = ses->auth_key.len;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册