drm: add some comments to drm_wait_vblank and drm_queue_vblank_event

during the review of the fix for locks problems in drm_wait_vblank,
a couple of false concerns were raised about how the drm_vblank_get
and drm_vblank_put are used in this function; it turned out that the
code is correct and that it cannot be simplified

add a few comments to explain non-obvious flows in the code,
to prevent "false alarms" in the future

v2: incorporate comments received from Daniel Vetter
Signed-off-by: NIlija Hadzic <ihadzic@research.bell-labs.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c

@@ -1125,6 +1125,7 @@ static int drm_queue_vblank_event(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe,
 		trace_drm_vblank_event_delivered(current->pid, pipe,
 						 vblwait->request.sequence);
 	} else {
+		/* drm_handle_vblank_events will call drm_vblank_put */
 		list_add_tail(&e->base.link, &dev->vblank_event_list);
 		vblwait->reply.sequence = vblwait->request.sequence;
 	}
@@ -1205,8 +1206,12 @@ int drm_wait_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 		goto done;
 	}
 
-	if (flags & _DRM_VBLANK_EVENT)
+	if (flags & _DRM_VBLANK_EVENT) {
+		/* must hold on to the vblank ref until the event fires
+		 * drm_vblank_put will be called asynchronously
+		 */
 		return drm_queue_vblank_event(dev, crtc, vblwait, file_priv);
+	}
 
 	if ((flags & _DRM_VBLANK_NEXTONMISS) &&
 	    (seq - vblwait->request.sequence) <= (1<<23)) {