提交 987eba66 编写于 作者: K KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki 提交者: Linus Torvalds

memcg: fix rmdir, force_empty with THP

Now, when THP is enabled, memcg's rmdir() function is broken because
move_account() for THP page is not supported.

This will cause account leak or -EBUSY issue at rmdir().
This patch fixes the issue by supporting move_account() THP pages.
Signed-off-by: NKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 ece35ca8
...@@ -2197,8 +2197,11 @@ void mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(struct page *head, struct page *tail) ...@@ -2197,8 +2197,11 @@ void mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(struct page *head, struct page *tail)
*/ */
static void __mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc, static void __mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc,
struct mem_cgroup *from, struct mem_cgroup *to, bool uncharge) struct mem_cgroup *from, struct mem_cgroup *to, bool uncharge,
int charge_size)
{ {
int nr_pages = charge_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
VM_BUG_ON(from == to); VM_BUG_ON(from == to);
VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(pc->page)); VM_BUG_ON(PageLRU(pc->page));
VM_BUG_ON(!page_is_cgroup_locked(pc)); VM_BUG_ON(!page_is_cgroup_locked(pc));
...@@ -2212,14 +2215,14 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc, ...@@ -2212,14 +2215,14 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc,
__this_cpu_inc(to->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_MAPPED]); __this_cpu_inc(to->stat->count[MEM_CGROUP_STAT_FILE_MAPPED]);
preempt_enable(); preempt_enable();
} }
mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(from, PageCgroupCache(pc), -1); mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(from, PageCgroupCache(pc), -nr_pages);
if (uncharge) if (uncharge)
/* This is not "cancel", but cancel_charge does all we need. */ /* This is not "cancel", but cancel_charge does all we need. */
mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(from, PAGE_SIZE); mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(from, charge_size);
/* caller should have done css_get */ /* caller should have done css_get */
pc->mem_cgroup = to; pc->mem_cgroup = to;
mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(to, PageCgroupCache(pc), 1); mem_cgroup_charge_statistics(to, PageCgroupCache(pc), nr_pages);
/* /*
* We charges against "to" which may not have any tasks. Then, "to" * We charges against "to" which may not have any tasks. Then, "to"
* can be under rmdir(). But in current implementation, caller of * can be under rmdir(). But in current implementation, caller of
...@@ -2234,15 +2237,19 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc, ...@@ -2234,15 +2237,19 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc,
* __mem_cgroup_move_account() * __mem_cgroup_move_account()
*/ */
static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc, static int mem_cgroup_move_account(struct page_cgroup *pc,
struct mem_cgroup *from, struct mem_cgroup *to, bool uncharge) struct mem_cgroup *from, struct mem_cgroup *to,
bool uncharge, int charge_size)
{ {
int ret = -EINVAL; int ret = -EINVAL;
unsigned long flags; unsigned long flags;
if ((charge_size > PAGE_SIZE) && !PageTransHuge(pc->page))
return -EBUSY;
lock_page_cgroup(pc); lock_page_cgroup(pc);
if (PageCgroupUsed(pc) && pc->mem_cgroup == from) { if (PageCgroupUsed(pc) && pc->mem_cgroup == from) {
move_lock_page_cgroup(pc, &flags); move_lock_page_cgroup(pc, &flags);
__mem_cgroup_move_account(pc, from, to, uncharge); __mem_cgroup_move_account(pc, from, to, uncharge, charge_size);
move_unlock_page_cgroup(pc, &flags); move_unlock_page_cgroup(pc, &flags);
ret = 0; ret = 0;
} }
...@@ -2267,6 +2274,8 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_parent(struct page_cgroup *pc, ...@@ -2267,6 +2274,8 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_parent(struct page_cgroup *pc,
struct cgroup *cg = child->css.cgroup; struct cgroup *cg = child->css.cgroup;
struct cgroup *pcg = cg->parent; struct cgroup *pcg = cg->parent;
struct mem_cgroup *parent; struct mem_cgroup *parent;
int charge = PAGE_SIZE;
unsigned long flags;
int ret; int ret;
/* Is ROOT ? */ /* Is ROOT ? */
...@@ -2278,17 +2287,23 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_parent(struct page_cgroup *pc, ...@@ -2278,17 +2287,23 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_parent(struct page_cgroup *pc,
goto out; goto out;
if (isolate_lru_page(page)) if (isolate_lru_page(page))
goto put; goto put;
/* The page is isolated from LRU and we have no race with splitting */
charge = PAGE_SIZE << compound_order(page);
parent = mem_cgroup_from_cont(pcg); parent = mem_cgroup_from_cont(pcg);
ret = __mem_cgroup_try_charge(NULL, gfp_mask, &parent, false, ret = __mem_cgroup_try_charge(NULL, gfp_mask, &parent, false, charge);
PAGE_SIZE);
if (ret || !parent) if (ret || !parent)
goto put_back; goto put_back;
ret = mem_cgroup_move_account(pc, child, parent, true); if (charge > PAGE_SIZE)
flags = compound_lock_irqsave(page);
ret = mem_cgroup_move_account(pc, child, parent, true, charge);
if (ret) if (ret)
mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(parent, PAGE_SIZE); mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(parent, charge);
put_back: put_back:
if (charge > PAGE_SIZE)
compound_unlock_irqrestore(page, flags);
putback_lru_page(page); putback_lru_page(page);
put: put:
put_page(page); put_page(page);
...@@ -4868,7 +4883,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, ...@@ -4868,7 +4883,7 @@ static int mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
goto put; goto put;
pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page); pc = lookup_page_cgroup(page);
if (!mem_cgroup_move_account(pc, if (!mem_cgroup_move_account(pc,
mc.from, mc.to, false)) { mc.from, mc.to, false, PAGE_SIZE)) {
mc.precharge--; mc.precharge--;
/* we uncharge from mc.from later. */ /* we uncharge from mc.from later. */
mc.moved_charge++; mc.moved_charge++;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册