提交 8cd162ce 编写于 作者: P Peter Zijlstra 提交者: Ingo Molnar

sched: only update rq->clock while holding rq->lock

Vatsa noticed rq->clock going funny and tracked it down to an update_rq_clock()
outside a rq->lock section.

This is a problem because things like double_rq_lock() update the rq->clock
value for both rqs. Therefore disabling interrupts isn't strong enough.
Reported-by: NSrivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
上级 5b16a221
......@@ -4441,12 +4441,8 @@ asmlinkage void __sched schedule(void)
if (sched_feat(HRTICK))
hrtick_clear(rq);
/*
* Do the rq-clock update outside the rq lock:
*/
local_irq_disable();
spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
update_rq_clock(rq);
spin_lock(&rq->lock);
clear_tsk_need_resched(prev);
if (prev->state && !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE)) {
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册