提交 8a783896 编写于 作者: X Xi Wang 提交者: Dave Airlie

vmwgfx: fix incorrect VRAM size check in vmw_kms_fb_create()

Commit e133e737 didn't correctly fix the integer overflow issue.

-	unsigned int required_size;
+	u64 required_size;
	...
	required_size = mode_cmd->pitch * mode_cmd->height;
-	if (unlikely(required_size > dev_priv->vram_size)) {
+	if (unlikely(required_size > (u64) dev_priv->vram_size)) {

Note that both pitch and height are u32.  Their product is still u32 and
would overflow before being assigned to required_size.  A correct way is
to convert pitch and height to u64 before the multiplication.

	required_size = (u64)mode_cmd->pitch * (u64)mode_cmd->height;

This patch calls the existing vmw_kms_validate_mode_vram() for
validation.
Signed-off-by: NXi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: NThomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
上级 77e00f2e
......@@ -1093,7 +1093,6 @@ static struct drm_framebuffer *vmw_kms_fb_create(struct drm_device *dev,
struct vmw_surface *surface = NULL;
struct vmw_dma_buffer *bo = NULL;
struct ttm_base_object *user_obj;
u64 required_size;
int ret;
/**
......@@ -1102,8 +1101,9 @@ static struct drm_framebuffer *vmw_kms_fb_create(struct drm_device *dev,
* requested framebuffer.
*/
required_size = mode_cmd->pitch * mode_cmd->height;
if (unlikely(required_size > (u64) dev_priv->vram_size)) {
if (!vmw_kms_validate_mode_vram(dev_priv,
mode_cmd->pitch,
mode_cmd->height)) {
DRM_ERROR("VRAM size is too small for requested mode.\n");
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册