提交 889a7a6a 编写于 作者: E Eric Dumazet 提交者: Ingo Molnar

percpu, x86: Fix percpu_xchg_op()

These recent percpu commits:

  2485b646: x86,percpu: Move out of place 64 bit ops into X86_64 section
  8270137a: cpuops: Use cmpxchg for xchg to avoid lock semantics

Caused this 'perf top' crash:

 Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
 Pid: 0, comm: swapper Tainted: G     D
 2.6.38-rc2-00181-gef71723 #413 Call Trace: <IRQ> [<ffffffff810465b5>]
    ? panic
    ? kmsg_dump
    ? kmsg_dump
    ? oops_end
    ? no_context
    ? __bad_area_nosemaphore
    ? perf_output_begin
    ? bad_area_nosemaphore
    ? do_page_fault
    ? __task_pid_nr_ns
    ? perf_event_tid
    ? __perf_event_header__init_id
    ? validate_chain
    ? perf_output_sample
    ? trace_hardirqs_off
    ? page_fault
    ? irq_work_run
    ? update_process_times
    ? tick_sched_timer
    ? tick_sched_timer
    ? __run_hrtimer
    ? hrtimer_interrupt
    ? account_system_vtime
    ? smp_apic_timer_interrupt
    ? apic_timer_interrupt
 ...

Looking at assembly code, I found:

list = this_cpu_xchg(irq_work_list, NULL);

gives this wrong code : (gcc-4.1.2 cross compiler)

ffffffff810bc45e:
	mov    %gs:0xead0,%rax
	cmpxchg %rax,%gs:0xead0
	jne    ffffffff810bc45e <irq_work_run+0x3e>
	test   %rax,%rax
	je     ffffffff810bc4aa <irq_work_run+0x8a>

Tell gcc we dirty eax/rax register in percpu_xchg_op()

Compiler must use another register to store pxo_new__

We also dont need to reload percpu value after a jump,
since a 'failed' cmpxchg already updated eax/rax

Wrong generated code was :
	xor     %rax,%rax   /* load 0 into %rax */
1:	mov     %gs:0xead0,%rax
	cmpxchg %rax,%gs:0xead0
	jne     1b
	test    %rax,%rax

After patch :

	xor     %rdx,%rdx   /* load 0 into %rdx */
	mov     %gs:0xead0,%rax
1:	cmpxchg %rdx,%gs:0xead0
	jne     1b:
	test    %rax,%rax
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <1295973114.3588.312.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
上级 9a57c3e4
......@@ -273,34 +273,34 @@ do { \
typeof(var) pxo_new__ = (nval); \
switch (sizeof(var)) { \
case 1: \
asm("\n1:mov "__percpu_arg(1)",%%al" \
"\n\tcmpxchgb %2, "__percpu_arg(1) \
asm("\n\tmov "__percpu_arg(1)",%%al" \
"\n1:\tcmpxchgb %2, "__percpu_arg(1) \
"\n\tjnz 1b" \
: "=a" (pxo_ret__), "+m" (var) \
: "=&a" (pxo_ret__), "+m" (var) \
: "q" (pxo_new__) \
: "memory"); \
break; \
case 2: \
asm("\n1:mov "__percpu_arg(1)",%%ax" \
"\n\tcmpxchgw %2, "__percpu_arg(1) \
asm("\n\tmov "__percpu_arg(1)",%%ax" \
"\n1:\tcmpxchgw %2, "__percpu_arg(1) \
"\n\tjnz 1b" \
: "=a" (pxo_ret__), "+m" (var) \
: "=&a" (pxo_ret__), "+m" (var) \
: "r" (pxo_new__) \
: "memory"); \
break; \
case 4: \
asm("\n1:mov "__percpu_arg(1)",%%eax" \
"\n\tcmpxchgl %2, "__percpu_arg(1) \
asm("\n\tmov "__percpu_arg(1)",%%eax" \
"\n1:\tcmpxchgl %2, "__percpu_arg(1) \
"\n\tjnz 1b" \
: "=a" (pxo_ret__), "+m" (var) \
: "=&a" (pxo_ret__), "+m" (var) \
: "r" (pxo_new__) \
: "memory"); \
break; \
case 8: \
asm("\n1:mov "__percpu_arg(1)",%%rax" \
"\n\tcmpxchgq %2, "__percpu_arg(1) \
asm("\n\tmov "__percpu_arg(1)",%%rax" \
"\n1:\tcmpxchgq %2, "__percpu_arg(1) \
"\n\tjnz 1b" \
: "=a" (pxo_ret__), "+m" (var) \
: "=&a" (pxo_ret__), "+m" (var) \
: "r" (pxo_new__) \
: "memory"); \
break; \
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册