提交 26ae9d1c 编写于 作者: C Chuck Lever 提交者: Anna Schumaker

xprtrdma: Revert commit e7104a2a ('xprtrdma: Cap req_cqinit').

The root of the problem was that sends (especially unsignalled
FASTREG and LOCAL_INV Work Requests) were not properly flow-
controlled, which allowed a send queue overrun.

Now that the RPC/RDMA reply handler waits for invalidation to
complete, the send queue is properly flow-controlled. Thus this
limit is no longer necessary.
Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Tested-by: NDevesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
上级 68791649
......@@ -616,10 +616,8 @@ rpcrdma_ep_create(struct rpcrdma_ep *ep, struct rpcrdma_ia *ia,
/* set trigger for requesting send completion */
ep->rep_cqinit = ep->rep_attr.cap.max_send_wr/2 - 1;
if (ep->rep_cqinit > RPCRDMA_MAX_UNSIGNALED_SENDS)
ep->rep_cqinit = RPCRDMA_MAX_UNSIGNALED_SENDS;
else if (ep->rep_cqinit <= 2)
ep->rep_cqinit = 0;
if (ep->rep_cqinit <= 2)
ep->rep_cqinit = 0; /* always signal? */
INIT_CQCOUNT(ep);
init_waitqueue_head(&ep->rep_connect_wait);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ep->rep_connect_worker, rpcrdma_connect_worker);
......
......@@ -88,12 +88,6 @@ struct rpcrdma_ep {
struct delayed_work rep_connect_worker;
};
/*
* Force a signaled SEND Work Request every so often,
* in case the provider needs to do some housekeeping.
*/
#define RPCRDMA_MAX_UNSIGNALED_SENDS (32)
#define INIT_CQCOUNT(ep) atomic_set(&(ep)->rep_cqcount, (ep)->rep_cqinit)
#define DECR_CQCOUNT(ep) atomic_sub_return(1, &(ep)->rep_cqcount)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册