提交 23c8cec8 编写于 作者: D Davidlohr Bueso 提交者: Linus Torvalds

ipc/msg: introduce msgctl(MSG_STAT_ANY)

There is a permission discrepancy when consulting msq ipc object
metadata between /proc/sysvipc/msg (0444) and the MSG_STAT shmctl
command.  The later does permission checks for the object vs S_IRUGO.
As such there can be cases where EACCESS is returned via syscall but the
info is displayed anyways in the procfs files.

While this might have security implications via info leaking (albeit no
writing to the msq metadata), this behavior goes way back and showing
all the objects regardless of the permissions was most likely an
overlook - so we are stuck with it.  Furthermore, modifying either the
syscall or the procfs file can cause userspace programs to break (ie
ipcs).  Some applications require getting the procfs info (without root
privileges) and can be rather slow in comparison with a syscall -- up to
500x in some reported cases for shm.

This patch introduces a new MSG_STAT_ANY command such that the msq ipc
object permissions are ignored, and only audited instead.  In addition,
I've left the lsm security hook checks in place, as if some policy can
block the call, then the user has no other choice than just parsing the
procfs file.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180215162458.10059-4-dave@stgolabs.netSigned-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Reported-by: NRobert Kettler <robert.kettler@outlook.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
上级 a280d6dc
......@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
/* ipcs ctl commands */
#define MSG_STAT 11
#define MSG_INFO 12
#define MSG_STAT_ANY 13
/* msgrcv options */
#define MSG_NOERROR 010000 /* no error if message is too big */
......
......@@ -497,14 +497,14 @@ static int msgctl_stat(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int msqid,
memset(p, 0, sizeof(*p));
rcu_read_lock();
if (cmd == MSG_STAT) {
if (cmd == MSG_STAT || cmd == MSG_STAT_ANY) {
msq = msq_obtain_object(ns, msqid);
if (IS_ERR(msq)) {
err = PTR_ERR(msq);
goto out_unlock;
}
id = msq->q_perm.id;
} else {
} else { /* IPC_STAT */
msq = msq_obtain_object_check(ns, msqid);
if (IS_ERR(msq)) {
err = PTR_ERR(msq);
......@@ -512,9 +512,14 @@ static int msgctl_stat(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int msqid,
}
}
err = -EACCES;
if (ipcperms(ns, &msq->q_perm, S_IRUGO))
goto out_unlock;
/* see comment for SHM_STAT_ANY */
if (cmd == MSG_STAT_ANY)
audit_ipc_obj(&msq->q_perm);
else {
err = -EACCES;
if (ipcperms(ns, &msq->q_perm, S_IRUGO))
goto out_unlock;
}
err = security_msg_queue_msgctl(&msq->q_perm, cmd);
if (err)
......@@ -572,6 +577,7 @@ long ksys_msgctl(int msqid, int cmd, struct msqid_ds __user *buf)
return err;
}
case MSG_STAT: /* msqid is an index rather than a msg queue id */
case MSG_STAT_ANY:
case IPC_STAT:
err = msgctl_stat(ns, msqid, cmd, &msqid64);
if (err < 0)
......@@ -690,6 +696,7 @@ long compat_ksys_msgctl(int msqid, int cmd, void __user *uptr)
}
case IPC_STAT:
case MSG_STAT:
case MSG_STAT_ANY:
err = msgctl_stat(ns, msqid, cmd, &msqid64);
if (err < 0)
return err;
......
......@@ -6006,6 +6006,7 @@ static int selinux_msg_queue_msgctl(struct kern_ipc_perm *msq, int cmd)
SECCLASS_SYSTEM, SYSTEM__IPC_INFO, NULL);
case IPC_STAT:
case MSG_STAT:
case MSG_STAT_ANY:
perms = MSGQ__GETATTR | MSGQ__ASSOCIATE;
break;
case IPC_SET:
......
......@@ -3230,6 +3230,7 @@ static int smack_msg_queue_msgctl(struct kern_ipc_perm *isp, int cmd)
switch (cmd) {
case IPC_STAT:
case MSG_STAT:
case MSG_STAT_ANY:
may = MAY_READ;
break;
case IPC_SET:
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册