Commit b7ab83ed (PM: Use spinlock instead of mutex in clock
management functions) introduced a regression causing clocks_mutex
to be acquired under a spinlock.  This happens because
pm_clk_suspend() and pm_clk_resume() call pm_clk_acquire() under
pcd->lock, but pm_clk_acquire() executes clk_get() which causes
clocks_mutex to be acquired.  Similarly, __pm_clk_remove(),
executed under pcd->lock, calls clk_put(), which also causes
clocks_mutex to be acquired.

To fix those problems make pm_clk_add() call pm_clk_acquire(), so
that pm_clk_suspend() and pm_clk_resume() don't have to do that.
Change pm_clk_remove() and pm_clk_destroy() to separate
modifications of the pcd->clock_list list from the actual removal of
PM clock entry objects done by __pm_clk_remove().
Reported-and-tested-by: NGuennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>