1. 21 2月, 2000 1 次提交
    • T
      Create a new expression node type RelabelType, which exists solely to · 57b30e8e
      Tom Lane 提交于
      represent the result of a binary-compatible type coercion.  At runtime
      it just evaluates its argument --- but during type resolution, exprType
      will pick up the output type of the RelabelType node instead of the type
      of the argument.  This solves some longstanding problems with dropped
      type coercions, an example being 'select now()::abstime::int4' which
      used to produce date-formatted output, not an integer, because the
      coercion to int4 was dropped on the floor.
      57b30e8e
  2. 16 2月, 2000 1 次提交
    • T
      New cost model for planning, incorporating a penalty for random page · b1577a7c
      Tom Lane 提交于
      accesses versus sequential accesses, a (very crude) estimate of the
      effects of caching on random page accesses, and cost to evaluate WHERE-
      clause expressions.  Export critical parameters for this model as SET
      variables.  Also, create SET variables for the planner's enable flags
      (enable_seqscan, enable_indexscan, etc) so that these can be controlled
      more conveniently than via PGOPTIONS.
      
      Planner now estimates both startup cost (cost before retrieving
      first tuple) and total cost of each path, so it can optimize queries
      with LIMIT on a reasonable basis by interpolating between these costs.
      Same facility is a win for EXISTS(...) subqueries and some other cases.
      
      Redesign pathkey representation to achieve a major speedup in planning
      (I saw as much as 5X on a 10-way join); also minor changes in planner
      to reduce memory consumption by recycling discarded Path nodes and
      not constructing unnecessary lists.
      
      Minor cleanups to display more-plausible costs in some cases in
      EXPLAIN output.
      
      Initdb forced by change in interface to index cost estimation
      functions.
      b1577a7c
  3. 15 2月, 2000 1 次提交
  4. 07 2月, 2000 1 次提交
    • T
      Repair planning bugs caused by my misguided removal of restrictinfo link · d8733ce6
      Tom Lane 提交于
      fields in JoinPaths --- turns out that we do need that after all :-(.
      Also, rearrange planner so that only one RelOptInfo is created for a
      particular set of joined base relations, no matter how many different
      subsets of relations it can be created from.  This saves memory and
      processing time compared to the old method of making a bunch of RelOptInfos
      and then removing the duplicates.  Clean up the jointree iteration logic;
      not sure if it's better, but I sure find it more readable and plausible
      now, particularly for the case of 'bushy plans'.
      d8733ce6
  5. 28 1月, 2000 1 次提交
    • T
      Redesign DISTINCT ON as discussed in pgsql-sql 1/25/00: syntax is now · dd979f66
      Tom Lane 提交于
      SELECT DISTINCT ON (expr [, expr ...]) targetlist ...
      and there is a check to make sure that the user didn't specify an ORDER BY
      that's incompatible with the DISTINCT operation.
      Reimplement nodeUnique and nodeGroup to use the proper datatype-specific
      equality function for each column being compared --- they used to do
      bitwise comparisons or convert the data to text strings and strcmp().
      (To add insult to injury, they'd look up the conversion functions once
      for each tuple...)  Parse/plan representation of DISTINCT is now a list
      of SortClause nodes.
      initdb forced by querytree change...
      dd979f66
  6. 26 1月, 2000 1 次提交
    • B
      Add: · 5c25d602
      Bruce Momjian 提交于
        * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2000, PostgreSQL, Inc
      
      to all files copyright Regents of Berkeley.  Man, that's a lot of files.
      5c25d602
  7. 17 1月, 2000 1 次提交
  8. 14 1月, 2000 1 次提交
  9. 09 1月, 2000 1 次提交
  10. 13 12月, 1999 1 次提交
  11. 10 12月, 1999 1 次提交
  12. 24 11月, 1999 1 次提交
  13. 07 10月, 1999 1 次提交
    • T
      Fix planner and rewriter to follow SQL semantics for tables that are · 3eb1c822
      Tom Lane 提交于
      mentioned in FROM but not elsewhere in the query: such tables should be
      joined over anyway.  Aside from being more standards-compliant, this allows
      removal of some very ugly hacks for COUNT(*) processing.  Also, allow
      HAVING clause without aggregate functions, since SQL does.  Clean up
      CREATE RULE statement-list syntax the same way Bruce just fixed the
      main stmtmulti production.
      CAUTION: addition of a field to RangeTblEntry nodes breaks stored rules;
      you will have to initdb if you have any rules.
      3eb1c822
  14. 04 10月, 1999 1 次提交
    • T
      Reimplement parsing and storage of default expressions and constraint · eabc714a
      Tom Lane 提交于
      expressions in CREATE TABLE.  There is no longer an emasculated expression
      syntax for these things; it's full a_expr for constraints, and b_expr
      for defaults (unfortunately the fact that NOT NULL is a part of the
      column constraint syntax causes a shift/reduce conflict if you try a_expr.
      Oh well --- at least parenthesized boolean expressions work now).  Also,
      stored expression for a column default is not pre-coerced to the column
      type; we rely on transformInsertStatement to do that when the default is
      actually used.  This means "f1 datetime default 'now'" behaves the way
      people usually expect it to.
      BTW, all the support code is now there to implement ALTER TABLE ADD
      CONSTRAINT and ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN with a default value.  I didn't
      actually teach ALTER TABLE to call it, but it wouldn't be much work.
      eabc714a
  15. 31 8月, 1999 1 次提交
  16. 21 8月, 1999 1 次提交
    • T
      Major revision of sort-node handling: push knowledge of query · db436adf
      Tom Lane 提交于
      sort order down into planner, instead of handling it only at the very top
      level of the planner.  This fixes many things.  An explicit sort is now
      avoided if there is a cheaper alternative (typically an indexscan) not
      only for ORDER BY, but also for the internal sort of GROUP BY.  It works
      even when there is no other reason (such as a WHERE condition) to consider
      the indexscan.  It works for indexes on functions.  It works for indexes
      on functions, backwards.  It's just so cool...
      
      CAUTION: I have changed the representation of SortClause nodes, therefore
      THIS UPDATE BREAKS STORED RULES.  You will need to initdb.
      db436adf
  17. 16 8月, 1999 1 次提交
    • T
      Major planner/optimizer revision: get rid of PathOrder node type, · e6381966
      Tom Lane 提交于
      store all ordering information in pathkeys lists (which are now lists of
      lists of PathKeyItem nodes, not just lists of lists of vars).  This was
      a big win --- the code is smaller and IMHO more understandable than it
      was, even though it handles more cases.  I believe the node changes will
      not force an initdb for anyone; planner nodes don't show up in stored
      rules.
      e6381966
  18. 09 8月, 1999 1 次提交
    • B
      > > Prevent sorting if result is already sorted · 158fd5f1
      Bruce Momjian 提交于
      > >
      > > was implemented by Jan Wieck.
      > > His work is for ascending order cases.
      > >
      > > Here is a patch to prevent sorting also in descending
      > > order cases.
      > > Because I had already changed _bt_first() to position
      > > backward correctly before v6.5,this patch would work.
      > >
      Hiroshi Inoue
      Inoue@tpf.co.jp
      158fd5f1
  19. 25 7月, 1999 1 次提交
    • T
      Clean up messy clause-selectivity code in clausesel.c; repair bug · ac4913a0
      Tom Lane 提交于
      identified by Hiroshi (incorrect cost attributed to OR clauses
      after multiple passes through set_rest_selec()).  I think the code
      was trying to allow selectivities of OR subclauses to be passed in
      from outside, but noplace was actually passing any useful data, and
      set_rest_selec() was passing wrong data.
      
      Restructure representation of "indexqual" in IndexPath nodes so that
      it is the same as for indxqual in completed IndexScan nodes: namely,
      a toplevel list with an entry for each pass of the index scan, having
      sublists that are implicitly-ANDed index qual conditions for that pass.
      You don't want to know what the old representation was :-(
      
      Improve documentation of OR-clause indexscan functions.
      
      Remove useless 'notclause' field from RestrictInfo nodes.  (This might
      force an initdb for anyone who has stored rules containing RestrictInfos,
      but I do not think that RestrictInfo ever appears in completed plans.)
      ac4913a0
  20. 19 7月, 1999 1 次提交
  21. 18 7月, 1999 1 次提交
  22. 16 7月, 1999 1 次提交
  23. 15 7月, 1999 1 次提交
  24. 26 5月, 1999 2 次提交
  25. 20 5月, 1999 1 次提交
  26. 19 5月, 1999 1 次提交
  27. 18 5月, 1999 1 次提交
  28. 12 5月, 1999 1 次提交
  29. 10 5月, 1999 1 次提交
  30. 25 4月, 1999 1 次提交
  31. 24 3月, 1999 1 次提交
  32. 01 3月, 1999 1 次提交
    • T
      Executor no longer cares about mergejoinop, mergerightorder, mergeleftorder, · b204d10c
      Tom Lane 提交于
      so remove them from MergeJoin node.  Hack together a partial
      solution for commuted mergejoin operators --- yesterday
      a mergejoin int4 = int8 would crash if the planner decided to
      commute it, today it works.  The planner's representation of
      mergejoins really needs a rewrite though.
      Also, further testing of mergejoin ops in opr_sanity regress test.
      b204d10c
  33. 23 2月, 1999 1 次提交
  34. 18 2月, 1999 1 次提交
  35. 15 2月, 1999 2 次提交
  36. 14 2月, 1999 1 次提交
  37. 12 2月, 1999 2 次提交