1. 30 9月, 1999 2 次提交
  2. 26 9月, 1999 1 次提交
    • T
      Implement constant-expression simplification per Bernard · 40f65241
      Tom Lane 提交于
      Frankpitt, plus some improvements from yours truly.  The simplifier depends
      on the proiscachable field of pg_proc to tell it whether a function is
      safe to pre-evaluate --- things like nextval() are not, for example.
      Update pg_proc.h to contain reasonable cacheability information; as of
      6.5.* hardly any functions were marked cacheable.  I may have erred too
      far in the other direction; see recent mail to pghackers for more info.
      This update does not force an initdb, exactly, but you won't see much
      benefit from the simplifier until you do one.
      40f65241
  3. 29 8月, 1999 1 次提交
    • T
      Correct broken entries for pg_proc OIDs 1364 (time(abstime)) · 1f14a9de
      Tom Lane 提交于
      and 1370 (timestamp(datetime)).  This does not force an initdb, exactly,
      but you won't see the effects of the bug fix until you do one.
      BTW, OID 1358 for timespan(time) is still broken:
      select timespan('21:11:26'::time);
      ERROR:  No such function 'time_timespan' with the specified attributes
      But I couldn't figure out what it ought to be defined as, so I left it be.
      1f14a9de
  4. 16 7月, 1999 1 次提交
  5. 26 5月, 1999 1 次提交
  6. 09 5月, 1999 1 次提交
  7. 04 5月, 1999 1 次提交
    • B
      here are some patches for 6.5.0 which I already submitted but have never · 210055ad
      Bruce Momjian 提交于
      been applied. The patches are in the .tar.gz attachment at the end:
      
      varchar-array.patch     this patch adds support for arrays of bpchar() and
                              varchar(), which where always missing from postgres.
      
                              These datatypes can be used to replace the _char4,
                              _char8, etc., which were dropped some time ago.
      
      block-size.patch        this patch fixes many errors in the parser and other
                              program which happen with very large query statements
                              (> 8K) when using a page size larger than 8192.
      
                              This patch is needed if you want to submit queries
                              larger than 8K. Postgres supports tuples up to 32K
                              but you can't insert them because you can't submit
                              queries larger than 8K. My patch fixes this problem.
      
                              The patch also replaces all the occurrences of `8192'
                              and `1<<13' in the sources with the proper constants
                              defined in include files. You should now never find
                              8192 hardwired in C code, just to make code clearer.
      
      
      --
      Massimo Dal Zotto
      210055ad
  8. 20 4月, 1999 1 次提交
  9. 14 4月, 1999 1 次提交
  10. 29 3月, 1999 1 次提交
    • T
      Modify fmgr so that internal name (compiler name) of a built-in · c537d429
      Tom Lane 提交于
      function is found in prosrc field of pg_proc, not proname.  This allows
      multiple aliases of a built-in to all be implemented as direct builtins,
      without needing a level of indirection through an SQL function.  Replace
      existing SQL alias functions with builtin entries accordingly.
      Save a few K by not storing string names of builtin functions in fmgr's
      internal table (if you really want 'em, get 'em from pg_proc...).
      Update opr_sanity with a few more cross-checks.
      c537d429
  11. 28 3月, 1999 1 次提交
  12. 15 3月, 1999 1 次提交
  13. 14 3月, 1999 1 次提交
    • B
      Enclosed below I have a patch to allow a btree index on the int8 type. · 817a3e6d
      Bruce Momjian 提交于
      I would like some feedback on what the hash function for the int8 hash
      function
      in the ./backend/access/hash/hashfunc.c should return.
      
      Also, could someone (maybe Tomas Lockhart?) look-over the patch and make
      sure
      the system table entries are correct?  I've tried to research them as
      much as I
      could, but some of them are still not clear to me.
      
      Thanks,
      -Ryan
      817a3e6d
  14. 10 3月, 1999 1 次提交
    • T
      Fix some typos in argument and result types in pg_proc · 3bca9c6c
      Tom Lane 提交于
      and pg_operator.  The lone error in pg_operator was reported as a bug
      by Michael Reifenberger; the multiple errors in pg_proc would only have
      been noticed if one invoked the functions by name rather than using
      operator syntax.  I guess few people do that.
      3bca9c6c
  15. 14 2月, 1999 1 次提交
  16. 13 2月, 1999 1 次提交
  17. 31 12月, 1998 1 次提交
  18. 14 12月, 1998 1 次提交
  19. 08 12月, 1998 1 次提交
  20. 17 11月, 1998 1 次提交
  21. 30 10月, 1998 2 次提交
  22. 23 10月, 1998 1 次提交
  23. 22 10月, 1998 6 次提交
  24. 21 10月, 1998 1 次提交
  25. 12 10月, 1998 1 次提交
  26. 08 10月, 1998 1 次提交
  27. 03 10月, 1998 2 次提交
    • B
      Integrate new IP type from Tom Ivar Helbekkmo. · 2d69fd90
      Bruce Momjian 提交于
      2d69fd90
    • B
      Here's a combination of all the patches I'm currently waiting · f93b6974
      Bruce Momjian 提交于
          for against a just updated CVS tree. It contains
      
              Partial new rewrite system that handles subselects,  view
              aggregate  columns, insert into select from view, updates
              with set col = view-value and select rules restriction to
              view definition.
      
              Updates  for  rule/view  backparsing utility functions to
              handle subselects correct.
      
      
              New system views pg_tables and pg_indexes (where you  can
              see the complete index definition in the latter one).
      
              Enabling array references on query parameters.
      
              Bugfix for functional index.
      
              Little changes to system views pg_rules and pg_views.
      
      
          The rule system isn't a release-stopper any longer.
      
          But  another  stopper  is  that  I  don't  know if the latest
          changes to PL/pgSQL (not already in CVS) made it  compile  on
          AIX. Still wait for some response from Dave.
      
      Jan
      f93b6974
  28. 01 9月, 1998 1 次提交
  29. 26 8月, 1998 1 次提交
    • M
      · 8e9d69d6
      Marc G. Fournier 提交于
      From: Massimo Dal Zotto <dz@cs.unitn.it>
      
      > sequence.patch
      >
      >       adds the missing setval command to sequences. Owner of sequences
      >       can now set the last value to any value between min and max
      >       without recreating the sequence. This is useful after loading
      >       data from external files.
      8e9d69d6
  30. 24 8月, 1998 1 次提交
    • B
      This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the · 15cb32d9
      Bruce Momjian 提交于
          patch is applied:
      
      	Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now.
      
      	Event qualifications on insert/update/delete  rules  work
      	fine now.
      
      	I  added  the  new  keyword  OLD to reference the CURRENT
      	tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5.
      
      	Update rules can  reference  NEW  and  OLD  in  the  rule
      	qualification and the actions.
      
      	Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to
      	let them behave like real tables.
      
      	For  insert/update/delete  rules  multiple  actions   are
      	supported  now.   The  actions  can also be surrounded by
      	parantheses to make psql  happy.   Multiple  actions  are
      	required if update to a view requires updates to multiple
      	tables.
      
      	Regular users  are  permitted  to  create/drop  rules  on
      	tables     they     have     RULE     permissions     for
      	(DefineQueryRewrite() is  now  able  to  get  around  the
      	access  restrictions  on  pg_rewrite).  This enables view
      	creation for regular users too. This  required  an  extra
      	boolean  parameter  to  pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to
      	set skipAcl on all rangetable entries  of  the  resulting
      	queries.       There      is      a      new     function
      	pg_exec_query_acl_override()  that  could  be   used   by
      	backend utilities to use this facility.
      
      	All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions
      	of the event relations  owner.  Sample:  User  A  creates
      	tables    T1    and    T2,   creates   rules   that   log
      	INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the  regression
      	tests  for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1
      	to user B.  User B  can  now  fully  access  T1  and  the
      	logging  happens  in  T2.  But user B cannot access T2 at
      	all, only the rule actions can. And due to  missing  RULE
      	permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging.
      
      	Rules  on  the  attribute  level are disabled (they don't
      	work properly and since regular users are  now  permitted
      	to create rules I decided to disable them).
      
      	Rules  on  select  must have exactly one action that is a
      	select (so select rules must be a view definition).
      
      	UPDATE NEW/OLD rules  are  disabled  (still  broken,  but
      	triggers can do it).
      
      	There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that
      	show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin
      	can  see  what  the  users do. They use two new functions
      	pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are  builtins.
      
      	The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could
      	be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump.
      
      	PostgreSQL is now the only database system I  know,  that
      	has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I
      	found a  rule  statement  at  all)  use  stored  database
      	procedures  or  the  like  (triggers as we call them) for
      	active rules (as some call them).
      
          Future of the rule system:
      
      	The now disabled parts  of  the  rule  system  (attribute
      	level,  multiple  actions on select and update new stuff)
      	require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch.  The
      	old one is too badly wired up.
      
      	After  6.4  I'll  start to work on a new rewrite handler,
      	that fully supports the attribute level  rules,  multiple
      	actions on select and update new.  This will be available
      	for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities.
      
      Jan
      15cb32d9
  31. 19 8月, 1998 1 次提交
    • B
      heap_fetch requires buffer pointer, must be released; heap_getnext · 79715390
      Bruce Momjian 提交于
      no longer returns buffer pointer, can be gotten from scan;
      	descriptor; bootstrap can create multi-key indexes;
      pg_procname index now is multi-key index; oidint2, oidint4, oidname
      are gone (must be removed from regression tests); use System Cache
      rather than sequential scan in many places; heap_modifytuple no
      longer takes buffer parameter; remove unused buffer parameter in
      a few other functions; oid8 is not index-able; remove some use of
      single-character variable names; cleanup Buffer variables usage
      and scan descriptor looping; cleaned up allocation and freeing of
      tuples; 18k lines of diff;
      79715390
  32. 15 8月, 1998 1 次提交