1. 09 5月, 2003 1 次提交
    • T
      Update 3.0 protocol support to match recent agreements about how to · c0a8c3ac
      Tom Lane 提交于
      handle multiple 'formats' for data I/O.  Restructure CommandDest and
      DestReceiver stuff one more time (it's finally starting to look a bit
      clean though).  Code now matches latest 3.0 protocol document as far
      as message formats go --- but there is no support for binary I/O yet.
      c0a8c3ac
  2. 07 5月, 2003 1 次提交
    • T
      Restructure command destination handling so that we pass around · 79913910
      Tom Lane 提交于
      DestReceiver pointers instead of just CommandDest values.  The DestReceiver
      is made at the point where the destination is selected, rather than
      deep inside the executor.  This cleans up the original kluge implementation
      of tstoreReceiver.c, and makes it easy to support retrieving results
      from utility statements inside portals.  Thus, you can now do fun things
      like Bind and Execute a FETCH or EXPLAIN command, and it'll all work
      as expected (e.g., you can Describe the portal, or use Execute's count
      parameter to suspend the output partway through).  Implementation involves
      stuffing the utility command's output into a Tuplestore, which would be
      kind of annoying for huge output sets, but should be quite acceptable
      for typical uses of utility commands.
      79913910
  3. 06 5月, 2003 2 次提交
    • T
      Implement feature of new FE/BE protocol whereby RowDescription identifies · 2cf57c8f
      Tom Lane 提交于
      the column by table OID and column number, if it's a simple column
      reference.  Along the way, get rid of reskey/reskeyop fields in Resdoms.
      Turns out that representation was not convenient for either the planner
      or the executor; we can make the planner deliver exactly what the
      executor wants with no more effort.
      initdb forced due to change in stored rule representation.
      2cf57c8f
    • T
      Ditch ExecGetTupType() in favor of the much simpler ExecGetResultType(), · 94a3c603
      Tom Lane 提交于
      which does the same thing.  Perhaps at one time there was a reason to
      allow plan nodes to store their result types in different places, but
      AFAICT that's been unnecessary for a good while.
      94a3c603
  4. 03 5月, 2003 1 次提交
    • T
      Portal and memory management infrastructure for extended query protocol. · de28dc9a
      Tom Lane 提交于
      Both plannable queries and utility commands are now always executed
      within Portals, which have been revamped so that they can handle the
      load (they used to be good only for single SELECT queries).  Restructure
      code to push command-completion-tag selection logic out of postgres.c,
      so that it won't have to be duplicated between simple and extended queries.
      initdb forced due to addition of a field to Query nodes.
      de28dc9a
  5. 30 4月, 2003 1 次提交
    • T
      Infrastructure for deducing Param types from context, in the same way · aa282d44
      Tom Lane 提交于
      that the types of untyped string-literal constants are deduced (ie,
      when coerce_type is applied to 'em, that's what the type must be).
      Remove the ancient hack of storing the input Param-types array as a
      global variable, and put the info into ParseState instead.  This touches
      a lot of files because of adjustment of routine parameter lists, but
      it's really not a large patch.  Note: PREPARE statement still insists on
      exact specification of parameter types, but that could easily be relaxed
      now, if we wanted to do so.
      aa282d44
  6. 29 4月, 2003 1 次提交
  7. 28 4月, 2003 1 次提交
    • T
      Put back encoding-conversion step in processing of incoming queries; · 982430f8
      Tom Lane 提交于
      I had inadvertently omitted it while rearranging things to support
      length-counted incoming messages.  Also, change the parser's API back
      to accepting a 'char *' query string instead of 'StringInfo', as the
      latter wasn't buying us anything except overhead.  (I think when I put
      it in I had some notion of making the parser API 8-bit-clean, but
      seeing that flex depends on null-terminated input, that's not really
      ever gonna happen.)
      982430f8
  8. 25 4月, 2003 1 次提交
    • T
      Infrastructure for upgraded error reporting mechanism. elog.c is · f690920a
      Tom Lane 提交于
      rewritten and the protocol is changed, but most elog calls are still
      elog calls.  Also, we need to contemplate mechanisms for controlling
      all this functionality --- eg, how much stuff should appear in the
      postmaster log?  And what API should libpq expose for it?
      f690920a
  9. 09 4月, 2003 1 次提交
  10. 28 3月, 2003 2 次提交
    • B
      Add new files. · 4b0b8dad
      Bruce Momjian 提交于
      4b0b8dad
    • B
      This patch implements holdable cursors, following the proposal · 54f7338f
      Bruce Momjian 提交于
      (materialization into a tuple store) discussed on pgsql-hackers earlier.
      I've updated the documentation and the regression tests.
      
      Notes on the implementation:
      
      - I needed to change the tuple store API slightly -- it assumes that it
      won't be used to hold data across transaction boundaries, so the temp
      files that it uses for on-disk storage are automatically reclaimed at
      end-of-transaction. I added a flag to tuplestore_begin_heap() to control
      this behavior. Is changing the tuple store API in this fashion OK?
      
      - in order to store executor results in a tuple store, I added a new
      CommandDest. This works well for the most part, with one exception: the
      current DestFunction API doesn't provide enough information to allow the
      Executor to store results into an arbitrary tuple store (where the
      particular tuple store to use is chosen by the call site of
      ExecutorRun). To workaround this, I've temporarily hacked up a solution
      that works, but is not ideal: since the receiveTuple DestFunction is
      passed the portal name, we can use that to lookup the Portal data
      structure for the cursor and then use that to get at the tuple store the
      Portal is using. This unnecessarily ties the Portal code with the
      tupleReceiver code, but it works...
      
      The proper fix for this is probably to change the DestFunction API --
      Tom suggested passing the full QueryDesc to the receiveTuple function.
      In that case, callers of ExecutorRun could "subclass" QueryDesc to add
      any additional fields that their particular CommandDest needed to get
      access to. This approach would work, but I'd like to think about it for
      a little bit longer before deciding which route to go. In the mean time,
      the code works fine, so I don't think a fix is urgent.
      
      - (semi-related) I added a NO SCROLL keyword to DECLARE CURSOR, and
      adjusted the behavior of SCROLL in accordance with the discussion on
      -hackers.
      
      - (unrelated) Cleaned up some SGML markup in sql.sgml, copy.sgml
      
      Neil Conway
      54f7338f
  11. 27 3月, 2003 1 次提交
  12. 20 3月, 2003 1 次提交
  13. 12 3月, 2003 1 次提交
  14. 10 3月, 2003 1 次提交
    • T
      Restructure parsetree representation of DECLARE CURSOR: now it's a · aa83bc04
      Tom Lane 提交于
      utility statement (DeclareCursorStmt) with a SELECT query dangling from
      it, rather than a SELECT query with a few unusual fields in it.  Add
      code to determine whether a planned query can safely be run backwards.
      If DECLARE CURSOR specifies SCROLL, ensure that the plan can be run
      backwards by adding a Materialize plan node if it can't.  Without SCROLL,
      you get an error if you try to fetch backwards from a cursor that can't
      handle it.  (There is still some discussion about what the exact
      behavior should be, but this is necessary infrastructure in any case.)
      Along the way, make EXPLAIN DECLARE CURSOR work.
      aa83bc04
  15. 09 3月, 2003 1 次提交
    • T
      Revise tuplestore and nodeMaterial so that we don't have to read the · aa60eecc
      Tom Lane 提交于
      entire contents of the subplan into the tuplestore before we can return
      any tuples.  Instead, the tuplestore holds what we've already read, and
      we fetch additional rows from the subplan as needed.  Random access to
      the previously-read rows works with the tuplestore, and doesn't affect
      the state of the partially-read subplan.  This is a step towards fixing
      the problems with cursors over complex queries --- we don't want to
      stick in Materialize nodes if they'll prevent quick startup for a cursor.
      aa60eecc
  16. 16 2月, 2003 1 次提交
  17. 15 2月, 2003 1 次提交
  18. 09 2月, 2003 2 次提交
  19. 04 2月, 2003 2 次提交
  20. 03 2月, 2003 2 次提交
  21. 29 1月, 2003 1 次提交
  22. 28 1月, 2003 1 次提交
    • T
      Upgrade cost estimation for joins, per discussion with Bradley Baetz. · 70fba704
      Tom Lane 提交于
      Try to model the effect of rescanning input tuples in mergejoins;
      account for JOIN_IN short-circuiting where appropriate.  Also, recognize
      that mergejoin and hashjoin clauses may now be more than single operator
      calls, so we have to charge appropriate execution costs.
      70fba704
  23. 23 1月, 2003 1 次提交
  24. 22 1月, 2003 1 次提交
    • T
      Fix coredump problem in plpgsql's RETURN NEXT. When a SELECT INTO · a4482f4c
      Tom Lane 提交于
      that's selecting into a RECORD variable returns zero rows, make it
      assign an all-nulls row to the RECORD; this is consistent with what
      happens when the SELECT INTO target is not a RECORD.  In support of
      this, tweak the SPI code so that a valid tuple descriptor is returned
      even when a SPI select returns no rows.
      a4482f4c
  25. 21 1月, 2003 1 次提交
    • T
      IN clauses appearing at top level of WHERE can now be handled as joins. · bdfbfde1
      Tom Lane 提交于
      There are two implementation techniques: the executor understands a new
      JOIN_IN jointype, which emits at most one matching row per left-hand row,
      or the result of the IN's sub-select can be fed through a DISTINCT filter
      and then joined as an ordinary relation.
      Along the way, some minor code cleanup in the optimizer; notably, break
      out most of the jointree-rearrangement preprocessing in planner.c and
      put it in a new file prep/prepjointree.c.
      bdfbfde1
  26. 13 1月, 2003 2 次提交
  27. 12 1月, 2003 1 次提交
  28. 11 1月, 2003 3 次提交
  29. 10 1月, 2003 1 次提交
    • T
      Adjust parser so that 'x NOT IN (subselect)' is converted to · 6bc61fc0
      Tom Lane 提交于
      'NOT (x IN (subselect))', that is 'NOT (x = ANY (subselect))',
      rather than 'x <> ALL (subselect)' as we formerly did.  This
      opens the door to optimizing NOT IN the same way as IN, whereas
      there's no hope of optimizing the expression using <>.  Also,
      convert 'x <> ALL (subselect)' to the NOT(IN) style, so that
      the optimization will be available when processing rules dumped
      by older Postgres versions.
      initdb forced due to small change in SubLink node representation.
      6bc61fc0
  30. 09 1月, 2003 1 次提交
  31. 31 12月, 2002 1 次提交
  32. 30 12月, 2002 1 次提交