1. 07 2月, 1999 1 次提交
  2. 06 2月, 1999 2 次提交
  3. 05 2月, 1999 3 次提交
  4. 04 2月, 1999 4 次提交
  5. 03 2月, 1999 1 次提交
  6. 09 11月, 1998 1 次提交
  7. 21 9月, 1998 1 次提交
  8. 01 9月, 1998 2 次提交
  9. 31 8月, 1998 1 次提交
  10. 24 8月, 1998 1 次提交
    • B
      This is the final state of the rule system for 6.4 after the · 15cb32d9
      Bruce Momjian 提交于
          patch is applied:
      
      	Rewrite rules on relation level work fine now.
      
      	Event qualifications on insert/update/delete  rules  work
      	fine now.
      
      	I  added  the  new  keyword  OLD to reference the CURRENT
      	tuple. CURRENT will be removed in 6.5.
      
      	Update rules can  reference  NEW  and  OLD  in  the  rule
      	qualification and the actions.
      
      	Insert/update/delete rules on views can be established to
      	let them behave like real tables.
      
      	For  insert/update/delete  rules  multiple  actions   are
      	supported  now.   The  actions  can also be surrounded by
      	parantheses to make psql  happy.   Multiple  actions  are
      	required if update to a view requires updates to multiple
      	tables.
      
      	Regular users  are  permitted  to  create/drop  rules  on
      	tables     they     have     RULE     permissions     for
      	(DefineQueryRewrite() is  now  able  to  get  around  the
      	access  restrictions  on  pg_rewrite).  This enables view
      	creation for regular users too. This  required  an  extra
      	boolean  parameter  to  pg_parse_and_plan() that tells to
      	set skipAcl on all rangetable entries  of  the  resulting
      	queries.       There      is      a      new     function
      	pg_exec_query_acl_override()  that  could  be   used   by
      	backend utilities to use this facility.
      
      	All rule actions (not only views) inherit the permissions
      	of the event relations  owner.  Sample:  User  A  creates
      	tables    T1    and    T2,   creates   rules   that   log
      	INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE on T1 in T2 (like in the  regression
      	tests  for rules I created) and grants ALL but RULE on T1
      	to user B.  User B  can  now  fully  access  T1  and  the
      	logging  happens  in  T2.  But user B cannot access T2 at
      	all, only the rule actions can. And due to  missing  RULE
      	permissions on T1, user B cannot disable logging.
      
      	Rules  on  the  attribute  level are disabled (they don't
      	work properly and since regular users are  now  permitted
      	to create rules I decided to disable them).
      
      	Rules  on  select  must have exactly one action that is a
      	select (so select rules must be a view definition).
      
      	UPDATE NEW/OLD rules  are  disabled  (still  broken,  but
      	triggers can do it).
      
      	There are two new system views (pg_rule and pg_view) that
      	show the definition of the rules or views so the db admin
      	can  see  what  the  users do. They use two new functions
      	pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() that are  builtins.
      
      	The functions pg_get_ruledef() and pg_get_viewdef() could
      	be used to implement rule and view support in pg_dump.
      
      	PostgreSQL is now the only database system I  know,  that
      	has rewrite rules on the query level. All others (where I
      	found a  rule  statement  at  all)  use  stored  database
      	procedures  or  the  like  (triggers as we call them) for
      	active rules (as some call them).
      
          Future of the rule system:
      
      	The now disabled parts  of  the  rule  system  (attribute
      	level,  multiple  actions on select and update new stuff)
      	require a complete new rewrite handler from scratch.  The
      	old one is too badly wired up.
      
      	After  6.4  I'll  start to work on a new rewrite handler,
      	that fully supports the attribute level  rules,  multiple
      	actions on select and update new.  This will be available
      	for 6.5 so we get full rewrite rule capabilities.
      
      Jan
      15cb32d9
  11. 19 8月, 1998 1 次提交
    • B
      heap_fetch requires buffer pointer, must be released; heap_getnext · 79715390
      Bruce Momjian 提交于
      no longer returns buffer pointer, can be gotten from scan;
      	descriptor; bootstrap can create multi-key indexes;
      pg_procname index now is multi-key index; oidint2, oidint4, oidname
      are gone (must be removed from regression tests); use System Cache
      rather than sequential scan in many places; heap_modifytuple no
      longer takes buffer parameter; remove unused buffer parameter in
      a few other functions; oid8 is not index-able; remove some use of
      single-character variable names; cleanup Buffer variables usage
      and scan descriptor looping; cleaned up allocation and freeing of
      tuples; 18k lines of diff;
      79715390
  12. 16 8月, 1998 1 次提交
  13. 15 8月, 1998 1 次提交
    • T
      Allow binary-compatible indices to be considered when checking for valid · 6912beea
      Thomas G. Lockhart 提交于
       indices for restriction clauses containing a constant.
      Note that if an index does not match directly (usually because the types
       on both side of the clause don't match), and if a binary-compatible index
       is identified, then the operator function will be replaced by a new
       one. Should not be a problem, but be sure that if types are listed as
       being binary compatible (in parse_coerce.h) then the comparison functions
       are also binary-compatible, giving equivalent results.
      6912beea
  14. 12 8月, 1998 1 次提交
  15. 10 8月, 1998 2 次提交
  16. 09 8月, 1998 1 次提交
  17. 07 8月, 1998 1 次提交
  18. 05 8月, 1998 1 次提交
  19. 04 8月, 1998 1 次提交
  20. 03 8月, 1998 1 次提交
  21. 02 8月, 1998 3 次提交
  22. 31 7月, 1998 1 次提交
  23. 28 7月, 1998 1 次提交
  24. 18 7月, 1998 1 次提交
  25. 16 6月, 1998 2 次提交
  26. 27 4月, 1998 1 次提交
    • B
      This patch... · 09baa3cc
      Bruce Momjian 提交于
      1. Removes the unnecessary "#define AbcRegProcedure 123"'s from
      pg_proc.h.
      
      2. Changes those #defines to use the names already defined in
      fmgr.h.
      
      3. Forces the make of fmgr.h in backend/Makefile instead of having
      it
         made as a dependency in access/common/Makefile  *hack*hack*hack*
      
      4. Rearranged the #includes to a less helter-skelter arrangement,
      also
          changing <file.h> to "file.h" to signify a non-system header.
      
      5. Removed "pg_proc.h" from files where its only purpose was for
      the
         #defines removed in item #1.
      
      6. Added "fmgr.h" to each file changed for completeness sake.
      
      Turns out that #6 was not necessary for some files because fmgr.h
      was being included in a roundabout way SIX levels deep by the first
      include.
      
      "access/genam.h"
       ->"access/relscan.h"
         ->"utils/rel.h"
           ->"access/strat.h"
             ->"access/skey.h"
      	 ->"fmgr.h"
      
      So adding fmgr.h really didn't add anything to the compile, hopefully
      just made it clearer to the programmer.
      
      S Darren.
      09baa3cc
  27. 06 4月, 1998 1 次提交
    • B
      Hi, · 1e801a8f
      Bruce Momjian 提交于
      Attached you'll find a (big) patch that fixes make dep and make
      depend in all Makefiles where I found it to be appropriate.
      
      It also removes the dependency in Makefile.global for NAMEDATALEN
      and OIDNAMELEN by making backend/catalog/genbki.sh and bin/initdb/initdb.sh
      a little smarter.
      
      This no longer requires initdb.sh that is turned into initdb with
      a sed script when installing Postgres, hence initdb.sh should be
      renamed to initdb (after the patch has been applied :-) )
      
      This patch is against the 6.3 sources, as it took a while to
      complete.
      
      Please review and apply,
      
      Cheers,
      
      Jeroen van Vianen
      1e801a8f
  28. 02 4月, 1998 1 次提交
  29. 31 3月, 1998 1 次提交
    • B
      There's a patch attached to fix gcc 2.8.x warnings, except for the · 9a0dd4fb
      Bruce Momjian 提交于
      yyerror ones from bison. It also includes a few 'enhancements' to
      the C programming style (which are, of course, personal).
      
      The other patch removes the compilation of backend/lib/qsort.c, as
      qsort() is a standard function in stdlib.h and can be used any
      where else (and it is). It was only used in
      backend/optimizer/geqo/geqo_pool.c, backend/optimizer/path/predmig.c,
      and backend/storage/page/bufpage.c
      
      > > Some or all of these changes might not be appropriate for v6.3,
      since we > > are in beta testing and since they do not affect the
      current functionality.  > > For those cases, how about submitting
      patches based on the final v6.3 > > release?
      
      There's more to come. Please review these patches. I ran the
      regression tests and they only failed where this was expected
      (random, geo, etc).
      
      Cheers,
      
      Jeroen
      9a0dd4fb