1. 09 5月, 1999 1 次提交
  2. 06 5月, 1999 1 次提交
    • T
      Fix some nasty coredump bugs in hashjoin. This code was just · 9f82f9e4
      Tom Lane 提交于
      about certain to fail anytime it decided the relation to be hashed was
      too big to fit in memory --- the code for 'batching' a series of hashjoins
      had multiple errors.  I've fixed the easier problems.  A remaining big
      problem is that you can get 'hashtable out of memory' if the code's
      guesstimate about how much overflow space it will need turns out wrong.
      That will require much more extensive revisions to fix, so I'm committing
      these fixes now before I start on that problem.
      9f82f9e4
  3. 14 2月, 1999 1 次提交
  4. 04 2月, 1999 1 次提交
  5. 17 1月, 1999 1 次提交
  6. 28 11月, 1998 1 次提交
  7. 01 9月, 1998 2 次提交
  8. 26 2月, 1998 1 次提交
  9. 13 2月, 1998 1 次提交
    • V
      Support for subselects. · 1a105cef
      Vadim B. Mikheev 提交于
      ExecReScan for nodeAgg, nodeHash, nodeHashjoin, nodeNestloop and nodeResult.
      Fixed ExecReScan for nodeMaterial.
      Get rid of #ifdef INDEXSCAN_PATCH.
      Get rid of ExecMarkPos and ExecRestrPos in nodeNestloop.
      1a105cef
  10. 13 1月, 1998 1 次提交
    • M
      Some *very* major changes by darrenk@insightdist.com (Darren King) · 374bb5d2
      Marc G. Fournier 提交于
      ==========================================
      What follows is a set of diffs that cleans up the usage of BLCKSZ.
      
      As a side effect, the person compiling the code can change the
      value of BLCKSZ _at_their_own_risk_.  By that, I mean that I've
      tried it here at 4096 and 16384 with no ill-effects.  A value
      of 4096 _shouldn't_ affect much as far as the kernel/file system
      goes, but making it bigger than 8192 can have severe consequences
      if you don't know what you're doing.  16394 worked for me, _BUT_
      when I went to 32768 and did an initdb, the SCSI driver broke and
      the partition that I was running under went to hell in a hand
      basket. Had to reboot and do a good bit of fsck'ing to fix things up.
      
      The patch can be safely applied though.  Just leave BLCKSZ = 8192
      and everything is as before.  It basically only cleans up all of the
      references to BLCKSZ in the code.
      
      If this patch is applied, a comment in the config.h file though above
      the BLCKSZ define with warning about monkeying around with it would
      be a good idea.
      
      Darren  darrenk@insightdist.com
      
      (Also cleans up some of the #includes in files referencing BLCKSZ.)
      ==========================================
      374bb5d2
  11. 09 9月, 1997 1 次提交
  12. 08 9月, 1997 1 次提交
  13. 07 9月, 1997 1 次提交
  14. 20 8月, 1997 1 次提交
  15. 28 7月, 1997 1 次提交
  16. 06 11月, 1996 1 次提交
  17. 31 10月, 1996 1 次提交
  18. 09 7月, 1996 1 次提交