- 16 1月, 1997 9 次提交
-
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Vadim B. Mikheev 提交于
by caller.
-
由 Vadim B. Mikheev 提交于
SetBufferWriteMode () added; FlushBuffer () fixed: now directly calls smgrflush () and releases buffer only if required by caller.
-
由 Vadim B. Mikheev 提交于
-
由 Vadim B. Mikheev 提交于
after writing next free XID.
-
由 Vadim B. Mikheev 提交于
release buffer if called from WriteNoReleaseBuffer ())
-
由 Bryan Henderson 提交于
-
由 Vadim B. Mikheev 提交于
-
- 15 1月, 1997 7 次提交
-
-
由 Marc G. Fournier 提交于
-
由 Marc G. Fournier 提交于
POinted out by: Martin S. Utesch <utesch@aut.tu-freiberg.de>
-
由 Marc G. Fournier 提交于
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
- 14 1月, 1997 18 次提交
-
-
由 Bryan Henderson 提交于
-
由 Bryan Henderson 提交于
Some compilers recognize this error.
-
由 Marc G. Fournier 提交于
all the other port related dependencies are ifeq, not ifneq.. If I'm wrong, someone tell me or change it back...
-
由 Vadim B. Mikheev 提交于
-
由 Vadim B. Mikheev 提交于
destroyed.
-
由 Vadim B. Mikheev 提交于
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
another one in Solaris' port-protos.h. The following patch will bring inet_aton's prototype into scope for Ultrix to silence a compilation warning. If the intention is to have inet_aton's prototype in its own header filer, the declaration in Solaris' port-protos.h should be removed. If the declaration in port-protos.h is deemed to be the correct place, a declaration should be added in Ultrix' port-protos.h regards Erik Bertelsen
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
included after storage/ipc.h like other similar cases that were changed recently. This one has popped up during the last few days. My sources are sup'ed today, 13. jan 1996. regards Erik Bertelsen.
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Marc G. Fournier 提交于
reduce *some* confusion, eh? :) From: Andrew Martin <martin@biochemistry.ucl.ac.uk>
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
- 13 1月, 1997 6 次提交
-
-
由 Bryan Henderson 提交于
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Bryan Henderson 提交于
-
由 Marc G. Fournier 提交于
OK, The votes are in for the NOFILES limit. With the exception of Next, for which I've not yet heard, all supported platforms seem to have the sysconf() call. port supported default Source. aix yes 2000 darrenk@insightdist.com alpha yes 4096 mjl@wwx.vip.at BSD44_derived yes 64 scrappy@hub.org bsdi yes ??? maillist@candle.pha.pa.us dgux yes ??? geek@andrew.cmu.edu hpux yes 60 emkxp01@mtcc.demon.co.uk i386_solaris yes 64 emkxp01@mtcc.demon.co.uk irix5 yes 200 martin@biochem.uc.ac.uk linux yes 256 emkxp01@mtcc.demon.co.uk next ???? ??? sparc_solaris yes 64 emkxp01@mtcc.demon.co.uk sunos4 yes 64 emkxp01@mtcc.demon.co.uk svr4 yes 64 chicks@chicks.net ultrix4 yes 64 erik@sockdev.uni-c.dk So here's a patch that I think will do the job. (I assume Next will have sysconf() but if not just add MISSING_SYSCONF to the config.h file ) Thanks, Keith.
-