- 07 8月, 2003 2 次提交
- 06 8月, 2003 5 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
something wider than int on that platform. Also, remove bogus assumption that sizeof("INT_MAX") has something to do with the maximum number of digits in an int.
-
由 Barry Lind 提交于
when a cursor wasn't being used. Modified Files: jdbc/org/postgresql/jdbc1/AbstractJdbc1ResultSet.java
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
writing one more value into return arrays than will fit. This is potentially a stack smash, though I do not think it is a problem in current uses of the routine, since a failure return causes elog anyway.
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
in HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP cases, including two potential stack smashes when more than six fractional digits were supplied. Per bug report from Philipp Reisner.
-
- 05 8月, 2003 7 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
so it won't miss 'em again.
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
Joe Conway
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
and send() very well at all; and in any case we can't use retval==0 for EOF due to race conditions. Make the same fixes in the backend as are required in libpq.
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
- 04 8月, 2003 12 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
-
由 Peter Eisentraut 提交于
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
and seems to have too few users to justify maintaining.
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
should catch most situations where repeated inlining blows up the expression complexity unreasonably, as in Joe Conway's recent example.
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
that they aren't part of error processing is clearly faulty.
-
- 02 8月, 2003 14 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
on machines with no IPv6 support.
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
platforms without AF_UNIX sockets.
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
completely useless error message in 'allow' case, don't retry connection at the sendauth stage (by then the server will either let us in or not, no point in wasting cycles on another try in the other SSL state).
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
that OS=hpux is the same as CPU=hppa. First steps at doing this. With these patches, we still work on hppa with either gcc or HP's cc. We might work on hpux/itanium with gcc, but I can't test it. Definitely will not work on hpux/itanium with non-gcc compiler, for lack of spinlock code.
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
from --with-includes.
-
由 Michael Meskes 提交于
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
-
由 Peter Eisentraut 提交于
-
由 Peter Eisentraut 提交于
and consistency.
-
由 Peter Eisentraut 提交于
uselessly invoke it in parallel in the first place.
-