- 11 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
This patch adds the core-system infrastructure needed to support updates on foreign tables, and extends contrib/postgres_fdw to allow updates against remote Postgres servers. There's still a great deal of room for improvement in optimization of remote updates, but at least there's basic functionality there now. KaiGai Kohei, reviewed by Alexander Korotkov and Laurenz Albe, and rather heavily revised by Tom Lane.
-
- 02 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
Fully update git head, and update back branches in ./COPYRIGHT and legal.sgml files.
-
- 19 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
If a potential equivalence clause references a variable from the nullable side of an outer join, the planner needs to take care that derived clauses are not pushed to below the outer join; else they may use the wrong value for the variable. (The problem arises only with non-strict clauses, since if an upper clause can be proven strict then the outer join will get simplified to a plain join.) The planner attempted to prevent this type of error by checking that potential equivalence clauses aren't outerjoin-delayed as a whole, but actually we have to check each side separately, since the two sides of the clause will get moved around separately if it's treated as an equivalence. Bugs of this type can be demonstrated as far back as 7.4, even though releases before 8.3 had only a very ad-hoc notion of equivalence clauses. In addition, we neglected to account for the possibility that such clauses might have nonempty nullable_relids even when not outerjoin-delayed; so the equivalence-class machinery lacked logic to compute correct nullable_relids values for clauses it constructs. This oversight was harmless before 9.2 because we were only using RestrictInfo.nullable_relids for OR clauses; but as of 9.2 it could result in pushing constructed equivalence clauses to incorrect places. (This accounts for bug #7604 from Bill MacArthur.) Fix the first problem by adding a new test check_equivalence_delay() in distribute_qual_to_rels, and fix the second one by adding code in equivclass.c and called functions to set correct nullable_relids for generated clauses. Although I believe the second part of this is not currently necessary before 9.2, I chose to back-patch it anyway, partly to keep the logic similar across branches and partly because it seems possible we might find other reasons why we need valid values of nullable_relids in the older branches. Add regression tests illustrating these problems. In 9.0 and up, also add test cases checking that we can push constants through outer joins, since we've broken that optimization before and I nearly broke it again with an overly simplistic patch for this problem.
-
- 27 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
This patch takes care of a number of problems having to do with failure to choose valid join orders and incorrect handling of lateral references pulled up from subqueries. Notable changes: * Add a LateralJoinInfo data structure similar to SpecialJoinInfo, to represent join ordering constraints created by lateral references. (I first considered extending the SpecialJoinInfo structure, but the semantics are different enough that a separate data structure seems better.) Extend join_is_legal() and related functions to prevent trying to form unworkable joins, and to ensure that we will consider joins that satisfy lateral references even if the joins would be clauseless. * Fill in the infrastructure needed for the last few types of relation scan paths to support parameterization. We'd have wanted this eventually anyway, but it is necessary now because a relation that gets pulled up out of a UNION ALL subquery may acquire a reltargetlist containing lateral references, meaning that its paths *have* to be parameterized whether or not we have any code that can push join quals down into the scan. * Compute data about lateral references early in query_planner(), and save in RelOptInfo nodes, to avoid repetitive calculations later. * Assorted corner-case bug fixes. There's probably still some bugs left, but this is a lot closer to being real than it was before.
-
- 26 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
setrefs.c failed to do "rtoffset" adjustment of Vars in RETURNING lists, which meant they were left with the wrong varnos when the RETURNING list was in a subquery. That was never possible before writable CTEs, of course, but now it's broken. The executor fails to notice any problem because ExecEvalVar just references the ecxt_scantuple for any normal varno; but EXPLAIN breaks when the varno is wrong, as illustrated in a recent complaint from Bartosz Dmytrak. Since the eventual rtoffset of the subquery is not known at the time we are preparing its plan node, the previous scheme of executing set_returning_clause_references() at that time cannot handle this adjustment. Fortunately, it turns out that we don't really need to do it that way, because all the needed information is available during normal setrefs.c execution; we just have to dig it out of the ModifyTable node. So, do that, and get rid of the kluge of early setrefs processing of RETURNING lists. (This is a little bit of a cheat in the case of inherited UPDATE/DELETE, because we are not passing a "root" struct that corresponds exactly to what the subplan was built with. But that doesn't matter, and anyway this is less ugly than early setrefs processing was.) Back-patch to 9.1, where the problem became possible to hit.
-
- 10 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
Further reflection shows that a single callback isn't very workable if we desire to let FDWs generate multiple Paths, because that forces the FDW to do all work necessary to generate a valid Plan node for each Path. Instead split the former PlanForeignScan API into three steps: GetForeignRelSize, GetForeignPaths, GetForeignPlan. We had already bit the bullet of breaking the 9.1 FDW API for 9.2, so this shouldn't cause very much additional pain, and it's substantially more flexible for complex FDWs. Add an fdw_private field to RelOptInfo so that the new functions can save state there rather than possibly having to recalculate information two or three times. In addition, we'd not thought through what would be needed to allow an FDW to set up subexpressions of its choice for runtime execution. We could treat ForeignScan.fdw_private as an executable expression but that seems likely to break existing FDWs unnecessarily (in particular, it would restrict the set of node types allowable in fdw_private to those supported by expression_tree_walker). Instead, invent a separate field fdw_exprs which will receive the postprocessing appropriate for expression trees. (One field is enough since it can be a list of expressions; also, we assume the corresponding expression state tree(s) will be held within fdw_state, so we don't need to add anything to ForeignScanState.) Per review of Hanada Shigeru's pgsql_fdw patch. We may need to tweak this further as we continue to work on that patch, but to me it feels a lot closer to being right now.
-
- 02 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
- 04 9月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
Formerly, set_subquery_pathlist and other creators of plans for subqueries saved only the rangetable and rowMarks lists from the lower-level PlannerInfo. But there's no reason not to remember the whole PlannerInfo, and indeed this turns out to simplify matters in a number of places. The immediate reason for doing this was so that the subroot will still be accessible when we're trying to extract column statistics out of an already-planned subquery. But now that I've done it, it seems like a good code-beautification effort in its own right. I also chose to get rid of the transient subrtable and subrowmark fields in SubqueryScan nodes, in favor of having setrefs.c look up the subquery's RelOptInfo. That required changing all the APIs in setrefs.c to pass PlannerInfo not PlannerGlobal, which was a large but quite mechanical transformation. One side-effect not foreseen at the beginning is that this finally broke inheritance_planner's assumption that replanning the same subquery RTE N times would necessarily give interchangeable results each time. That assumption was always pretty risky, but now we really have to make a separate RTE for each instance so that there's a place to carry the separate subroots.
-
- 09 8月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
A PlaceHolderVar's expression might contain another, lower-level PlaceHolderVar. If the outer PlaceHolderVar is used, the inner one certainly will be also, and so we have to make sure that both of them get into the placeholder_list with correct ph_may_need values during the initial pre-scan of the query (before deconstruct_jointree starts). We did this correctly for PlaceHolderVars appearing in the query quals, but overlooked the issue for those appearing in the top-level targetlist; with the result that nested placeholders referenced only in the targetlist did not work correctly, as illustrated in bug #6154. While at it, add some error checking to find_placeholder_info to ensure that we don't try to create new placeholders after it's too late to do so; they have to all be created before deconstruct_jointree starts. Back-patch to 8.4 where the PlaceHolderVar mechanism was introduced.
-
- 25 4月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
The previous coding failed to account properly for the costs of evaluating the input expressions of aggregates and window functions, as seen in a recent gripe from Claudio Freire. (I said at the time that it wasn't counting these costs at all; but on closer inspection, it was effectively charging these costs once per output tuple. That is completely wrong for aggregates, and not exactly right for window functions either.) There was also a hard-wired assumption that aggregates and window functions had procost 1.0, which is now fixed to respect the actual cataloged costs. The costing of WindowAgg is still pretty bogus, since it doesn't try to estimate the effects of spilling data to disk, but that seems like a separate issue.
-
- 20 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
All expression nodes now have an explicit output-collation field, unless they are known to only return a noncollatable data type (such as boolean or record). Also, nodes that can invoke collation-aware functions store a separate field that is the collation value to pass to the function. This avoids confusion that arises when a function has collatable inputs and noncollatable output type, or vice versa. Also, replace the parser's on-the-fly collation assignment method with a post-pass over the completed expression tree. This allows us to use a more complex (and hopefully more nearly spec-compliant) assignment rule without paying for it in extra storage in every expression node. Fix assorted bugs in the planner's handling of collations by making collation one of the defining properties of an EquivalenceClass and by converting CollateExprs into discardable RelabelType nodes during expression preprocessing.
-
- 26 2月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
This patch implements data-modifying WITH queries according to the semantics that the updates all happen with the same command counter value, and in an unspecified order. Therefore one WITH clause can't see the effects of another, nor can the outer query see the effects other than through the RETURNING values. And attempts to do conflicting updates will have unpredictable results. We'll need to document all that. This commit just fixes the code; documentation updates are waiting on author. Marko Tiikkaja and Hitoshi Harada
-
- 02 1月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
- 05 11月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
Per my recent proposal, get rid of all the direct inspection of indexes and manual generation of paths in planagg.c. Instead, set up EquivalenceClasses for the aggregate argument expressions, and let the regular path generation logic deal with creating paths that can satisfy those sort orders. This makes planagg.c a bit more visible to the rest of the planner than it was originally, but the approach is basically a lot cleaner than before. A major advantage of doing it this way is that we get MIN/MAX optimization on inheritance trees (using MergeAppend of indexscans) practically for free, whereas in the old way we'd have had to add a whole lot more duplicative logic. One small disadvantage of this approach is that MIN/MAX aggregates can no longer exploit partial indexes having an "x IS NOT NULL" predicate, unless that restriction or something that implies it is specified in the query. The previous implementation was able to use the added "x IS NOT NULL" condition as an extra predicate proof condition, but in this version we rely entirely on indexes that are considered usable by the main planning process. That seems a fair tradeoff for the simplicity and functionality gained.
-
- 21 9月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Magnus Hagander 提交于
-
- 29 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
fixes things so that it works for cases where nested removals are possible. The overhead of the optimization should be significantly less, as well.
-
- 26 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
- 13 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
This patch allows the frame to start from CURRENT ROW (in either RANGE or ROWS mode), and it also adds support for ROWS n PRECEDING and ROWS n FOLLOWING start and end points. (RANGE value PRECEDING/FOLLOWING isn't there yet --- the grammar works, but that's all.) Hitoshi Harada, reviewed by Pavel Stehule
-
- 16 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
parse analysis phase, rather than at execution time. This makes parameter handling work the same as it does in ordinary plannable queries, and in particular fixes the incompatibility that Pavel pointed out with plpgsql's new handling of variable references. plancache.c gets a little bit grottier, but the alternatives seem worse.
-
- 03 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
- 02 1月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
to be just a minor extension of the previous patch that made "x IS NULL" indexable, because we can treat the IS NOT NULL condition as if it were "x < NULL" or "x > NULL" (depending on the index's NULLS FIRST/LAST option), just like IS NULL is treated like "x = NULL". Aside from any possible usefulness in its own right, this is an important improvement for index-optimized MAX/MIN aggregates: it is now reliably possible to get a column's min or max value cheaply, even when there are a lot of nulls cluttering the interesting end of the index.
-
- 26 10月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
a lot of strange behaviors that occurred in join cases. We now identify the "current" row for every joined relation in UPDATE, DELETE, and SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE queries. If an EvalPlanQual recheck is necessary, we jam the appropriate row into each scan node in the rechecking plan, forcing it to emit only that one row. The former behavior could rescan the whole of each joined relation for each recheck, which was terrible for performance, and what's much worse could result in duplicated output tuples. Also, the original implementation of EvalPlanQual could not re-use the recheck execution tree --- it had to go through a full executor init and shutdown for every row to be tested. To avoid this overhead, I've associated a special runtime Param with each LockRows or ModifyTable plan node, and arranged to make every scan node below such a node depend on that Param. Thus, by signaling a change in that Param, the EPQ machinery can just rescan the already-built test plan. This patch also adds a prohibition on set-returning functions in the targetlist of SELECT FOR UPDATE/SHARE. This is needed to avoid the duplicate-output-tuple problem. It seems fairly reasonable since the other restrictions on SELECT FOR UPDATE are meant to ensure that there is a unique correspondence between source tuples and result tuples, which an output SRF destroys as much as anything else does.
-
- 13 10月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
execMain.c and into a new plan node type LockRows. Like the recent change to put table updating into a ModifyTable plan node, this increases planning flexibility by allowing the operations to occur below the top level of the plan tree. It's necessary in any case to restore the previous behavior of having FOR UPDATE locking occur before ModifyTable does. This partially refactors EvalPlanQual to allow multiple rows-under-test to be inserted into the EPQ machinery before starting an EPQ test query. That isn't sufficient to fix EPQ's general bogosity in the face of plans that return multiple rows per test row, though. Since this patch is mostly about getting some plan node infrastructure in place and not about fixing ten-year-old bugs, I will leave EPQ improvements for another day. Another behavioral change that we could now think about is doing FOR UPDATE before LIMIT, but that too seems like it should be treated as a followon patch.
-
- 10 10月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
They are now handled by a new plan node type called ModifyTable, which is placed at the top of the plan tree. In itself this change doesn't do much, except perhaps make the handling of RETURNING lists and inherited UPDATEs a tad less klugy. But it is necessary preparation for the intended extension of allowing RETURNING queries inside WITH. Marko Tiikkaja
-
- 11 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
provided by Andrew.
-
- 02 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
- 31 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
patch. This includes the ability to force the frame to cover the whole partition, and the ability to make the frame end exactly on the current row rather than its last ORDER BY peer. Supporting any more of the full SQL frame-clause syntax will require nontrivial hacking on the window aggregate code, so it'll have to wait for 8.5 or beyond.
-
- 29 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
Hitoshi Harada, with some kibitzing from Heikki and Tom.
-
- 08 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
implementation uses an in-memory hash table, so it will poop out for very large recursive results ... but the performance characteristics of a sort-based implementation would be pretty unpleasant too.
-
- 05 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
There are some unimplemented aspects: recursive queries must use UNION ALL (should allow UNION too), and we don't have SEARCH or CYCLE clauses. These might or might not get done for 8.4, but even without them it's a pretty useful feature. There are also a couple of small loose ends and definitional quibbles, which I'll send a memo about to pgsql-hackers shortly. But let's land the patch now so we can get on with other development. Yoshiyuki Asaba, with lots of help from Tatsuo Ishii and Tom Lane
-
- 10 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
when user-defined functions used in a plan are modified. Also invalidate plans when schemas, operators, or operator classes are modified; but for these cases we just invalidate everything rather than tracking exact dependencies, since these types of objects seldom change in a production database. Tom Lane; loosely based on a patch by Martin Pihlak.
-
- 15 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
the old JOIN_IN code, but antijoins are new functionality.) Teach the planner to convert appropriate EXISTS and NOT EXISTS subqueries into semi and anti joins respectively. Also, LEFT JOINs with suitable upper-level IS NULL filters are recognized as being anti joins. Unify the InClauseInfo and OuterJoinInfo infrastructure into "SpecialJoinInfo". With that change, it becomes possible to associate a SpecialJoinInfo with every join attempt, which permits some cleanup of join selectivity estimation. That needs to be taken much further than this patch does, but the next step is to change the API for oprjoin selectivity functions, which seems like material for a separate patch. So for the moment the output size estimates for semi and especially anti joins are quite bogus.
-
- 08 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
hashtable entries for tuples that are found only in the second input: they can never contribute to the output. Furthermore, this implies that the planner should endeavor to put first the smaller (in number of groups) input relation for an INTERSECT. Implement that, and upgrade prepunion's estimation of the number of rows returned by setops so that there's some amount of sanity in the estimate of which one is smaller.
-
- 07 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
This completes my project of improving usage of hashing for duplicate elimination (aggregate functions with DISTINCT remain undone, but that's for some other day). As with the previous patches, this means we can INTERSECT/EXCEPT on datatypes that can hash but not sort, and it means that INTERSECT/EXCEPT without ORDER BY are no longer certain to produce sorted output.
-
- 03 5月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
retrieved to be controlled through a GUC variable. Robert Hell
-
- 18 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
we had several code paths where a physical tlist could be used for the input to a Sort node, which is a dumb idea because any unneeded table columns will increase the volume of data the sort has to push around. (Unfortunately the easy-looking fix of calling disuse_physical_tlist during make_sort_xxx doesn't work because in most cases we're already committed to the current input tlist --- it's been marked with sort column numbers, or we've built grouping column numbers using it, etc. The tlist has to be selected properly at the calling level before we start constructing sort-col information. This is easy enough to do, we were just failing to take the point into consideration.) Back-patch to 8.3. I believe the problem probably exists clear back to 7.4 when the physical tlist optimization was added, but I'm afraid to back-patch further than 8.3 without a great deal more study than I want to put into it. The code in this area has drifted a lot over time. The real-world importance of these code paths is uncertain anyway --- I think in many cases we'd probably prefer hash-based methods.
-
- 02 1月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
- 16 11月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
avoid this problem in the future.)
-
由 Bruce Momjian 提交于
-
- 12 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tom Lane 提交于
a relation as a reason to invalidate a plan when the relation changes. This handles scenarios such as dropping/recreating a sequence that is referenced by nextval('seq') in a cached plan. Rather than teach plancache.c all about digging through plan trees to find regclass Consts, we charge the planner's setrefs.c with making a list of the relation OIDs on which each plan depends. That way the list can be built cheaply during a plan tree traversal that has to happen anyway. Per bug #3662 and subsequent discussion.
-