Actually there's a better way to do this, which is to count tuples
during the vacuumcleanup scan that we're going to do anyway. Should save a few cycles (one calculation per page, not per tuple) as well as not having to depend on assumptions about heap and index being in step. I think this could probably be made to work for GIST too, but that code looks messy enough that I'm disinclined to try right now.
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录