提交 92c3a800 编写于 作者: T Tom Lane

Revert my erroneous fix for Taiki Yamaguchi's DISTINCT MAX() bug.

Whatever we do about that, this isn't the path to the solution.
上级 707867e9
......@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/plan/planner.c,v 1.226.2.1 2008/03/27 19:06:23 tgl Exp $
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/plan/planner.c,v 1.226.2.2 2008/03/29 00:15:37 tgl Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
......@@ -943,17 +943,6 @@ grouping_planner(PlannerInfo *root, double tuple_fraction)
* right tlist, and it has no sort order.
*/
current_pathkeys = NIL;
/*
* In fact, since we don't optimize grouped aggregates, it
* needs no sort order --- there must be exactly one output row,
* and so any ORDER BY or DISTINCT attached to the query is
* useless and can be dropped. Aside from saving useless cycles,
* this protects us against problems with matching the hacked-up
* tlist entries to sort clauses.
*/
Assert(!parse->groupClause);
parse->sortClause = NULL;
parse->distinctClause = NULL;
}
else
{
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册