提交 5b5ee14a 编写于 作者: T Tom Lane

Add a defense to prevent storing pseudo-type data into index columns.

Formerly, the lack of any opclasses that could accept such data was enough
of a defense, but now with a "record" opclass we need to check more carefully.
(You can still use that opclass for an index, but you have to store a named
composite type not an anonymous one.)
上级 2f0d5282
......@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/catalog/index.c,v 1.305 2008/09/30 10:52:12 heikki Exp $
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/catalog/index.c,v 1.306 2008/10/14 21:47:39 tgl Exp $
*
*
* INTERFACE ROUTINES
......@@ -236,6 +236,17 @@ ConstructTupleDescriptor(Relation heapRelation,
to->attislocal = true;
ReleaseSysCache(tuple);
/*
* Make sure the expression yields a type that's safe to store in
* an index. We need this defense because we have index opclasses
* for pseudo-types such as "record", and the actually stored type
* had better be safe; eg, a named composite type is okay, an
* anonymous record type is not. The test is the same as for
* whether a table column is of a safe type (which is why we
* needn't check for the non-expression case).
*/
CheckAttributeType(NameStr(to->attname), to->atttypid);
}
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册