提交 17804fa7 编写于 作者: T Tom Lane

Prefer actual constants to pseudo-constants in equivalence class machinery.

generate_base_implied_equalities_const() should prefer plain Consts over
other em_is_const eclass members when choosing the "pivot" value that
all the other members will be equated to.  This makes it more likely that
the generated equalities will be useful in constraint-exclusion proofs.
Per report from Rushabh Lathia.
上级 5a39114f
......@@ -769,7 +769,12 @@ generate_base_implied_equalities_const(PlannerInfo *root,
}
}
/* Find the constant member to use */
/*
* Find the constant member to use. We prefer an actual constant to
* pseudo-constants (such as Params), because the constraint exclusion
* machinery might be able to exclude relations on the basis of generated
* "var = const" equalities, but "var = param" won't work for that.
*/
foreach(lc, ec->ec_members)
{
EquivalenceMember *cur_em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc);
......@@ -777,7 +782,8 @@ generate_base_implied_equalities_const(PlannerInfo *root,
if (cur_em->em_is_const)
{
const_em = cur_em;
break;
if (IsA(cur_em->em_expr, Const))
break;
}
}
Assert(const_em != NULL);
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册