• T
    Fix planner and rewriter to follow SQL semantics for tables that are · 3eb1c822
    Tom Lane 提交于
    mentioned in FROM but not elsewhere in the query: such tables should be
    joined over anyway.  Aside from being more standards-compliant, this allows
    removal of some very ugly hacks for COUNT(*) processing.  Also, allow
    HAVING clause without aggregate functions, since SQL does.  Clean up
    CREATE RULE statement-list syntax the same way Bruce just fixed the
    main stmtmulti production.
    CAUTION: addition of a field to RangeTblEntry nodes breaks stored rules;
    you will have to initdb if you have any rules.
    3eb1c822
execMain.c 45.5 KB