FieldNotContainedLiteralsDiffer,"The module contains the field\n %s \nbut its signature specifies\n %s \nThe 'literal' modifiers differ"
FieldNotContainedTypesDiffer,"The module contains the field\n %s \nbut its signature specifies\n %s \nThe types differ"
331,typrelCannotResolveImplicitGenericInstantiation,"The implicit instantiation of a generic construct at or near this point could not be resolved because it could resolve to multiple unrelated types, e.g. '%s' and '%s'. Consider using type annotations to resolve the ambiguity"
332,typrelCannotResolveAmbiguityInOverloadedOperator,"Could not resolve the ambiguity inherent in the use of the operator '%s' at or near this program point. Consider using type annotations to resolve the ambiguity."
333,typrelCannotResolveAmbiguityInPrintf,"Could not resolve the ambiguity inherent in the use of a 'printf'-style format string"
334,typrelCannotResolveAmbiguityInEnum,"Could not resolve the ambiguity in the use of a generic construct with an 'enum' constraint at or near this position"
335,typrelCannotResolveAmbiguityInDelegate,"Could not resolve the ambiguity in the use of a generic construct with a 'delegate' constraint at or near this position"
<targetstate="translated">Nepovedlo se přeložit implicitní vytvoření instance obecného konstruktoru na této pozici nebo blízko ní, protože by se dala přeložit na víc nesouvisejících typů, třeba {0} a {1}. Tuto nejednoznačnost můžete vyřešit pomocí poznámek typu.</target>
<source>Could not resolve the ambiguity inherent in the use of the operator '{0}' at or near this program point. Consider using type annotations to resolve the ambiguity.</source>
<targetstate="translated">Nepovedlo se vyřešit nejednoznačnost vyplývající z použití operátoru {0} na tomto místě v programu nebo blízko něho. Tuto nejednoznačnost můžete vyřešit pomocí poznámek typu.</target>
<targetstate="translated">Die implizite Instanziierung eines generischen Konstrukts an diesem Punkt oder in dessen Umgebung konnte nicht aufgelöst werden, weil sie zu mehreren unzusammenhängenden Typen aufgelöst werden könnte, z.B. "{0}" und "{1}". Verwenden Sie Typanmerkungen, um die Mehrdeutigkeit aufzulösen.</target>
<source>Could not resolve the ambiguity inherent in the use of the operator '{0}' at or near this program point. Consider using type annotations to resolve the ambiguity.</source>
<targetstate="translated">Die inhärente Mehrdeutigkeit bei der Verwendung des {0}-Operators an diesem Programmpunkt oder in dessen Umgebung konnte nicht aufgelöst werden. Verwenden Sie Typanmerkungen, um die Mehrdeutigkeit aufzulösen.</target>
<targetstate="new">The implicit instantiation of a generic construct at or near this point could not be resolved because it could resolve to multiple unrelated types, e.g. '{0}' and '{1}'. Consider using type annotations to resolve the ambiguity</target>
<source>Could not resolve the ambiguity inherent in the use of the operator '{0}' at or near this program point. Consider using type annotations to resolve the ambiguity.</source>
<targetstate="new">Could not resolve the ambiguity inherent in the use of the operator '{0}' at or near this program point. Consider using type annotations to resolve the ambiguity.</target>
<targetstate="translated">No se pudo resolver la creación de instancia implícita de una construcción genérica en este punto o cerca de él porque se podía resolver en varios tipos no relacionados; por ejemplo, '{0}' y '{1}'. Considere el uso de anotaciones de tipo para resolver la ambigüedad.</target>
<source>Could not resolve the ambiguity inherent in the use of the operator '{0}' at or near this program point. Consider using type annotations to resolve the ambiguity.</source>
<targetstate="translated">No se pudo resolver la ambigüedad inherente en el uso del operador '{0}' en este punto del programa o cerca de él. Considere el uso de anotaciones de tipo para resolver la ambigüedad.</target>
<targetstate="translated">Impossible de résoudre l'instanciation implicite d'une construction générique à cet emplacement ou à proximité, car elle peut être résolue en plusieurs types non liés, par exemple '{0}' et '{1}'. Utilisez des annotations de type pour résoudre l'ambigüité</target>
<source>Could not resolve the ambiguity inherent in the use of the operator '{0}' at or near this program point. Consider using type annotations to resolve the ambiguity.</source>
<targetstate="translated">Impossible de résoudre l'ambigüité inhérente à l'utilisation de l'opérateur '{0}' à cet emplacement du programme ou à proximité. Utilisez des annotations de type pour résoudre l'ambigüité.</target>
<targetstate="translated">Non è stato possibile risolvere la creazione di istanza implicita di un costrutto generico in questo punto o in prossimità di esso perché la risoluzione potrebbe restituire più tipi non correlati, ad esempio '{0}' e '{1}'. Provare a usare annotazioni di tipo per risolvere l'ambiguità</target>
<source>Could not resolve the ambiguity inherent in the use of the operator '{0}' at or near this program point. Consider using type annotations to resolve the ambiguity.</source>
<targetstate="translated">Non è stato possibile risolvere l'ambiguità relativa all'uso dell'operatore '{0}' in questo punto del programma o in prossimità di esso. Provare invece a risolvere l'ambiguità usando annotazioni di tipo.</target>
<source>Could not resolve the ambiguity inherent in the use of the operator '{0}' at or near this program point. Consider using type annotations to resolve the ambiguity.</source>
<targetstate="translated">관련되지 않은 여러 형식(예: '{0}'과(와) '{1}')으로 확인될 수 있으므로 이 지점 또는 이 지점 근처에서 제네릭 구문의 암시적 인스턴스를 확인할 수 없습니다. 형식 주석을 사용하여 모호성을 해결하세요.</target>
<source>Could not resolve the ambiguity inherent in the use of the operator '{0}' at or near this program point. Consider using type annotations to resolve the ambiguity.</source>
<targetstate="translated">’{0}' 연산자 사용과 관련하여 이 프로그램 지점 또는 이 지점 근처에서 본질적으로 발생하는 모호성을 해결할 수 없습니다. 형식 주석을 사용하여 모호성을 해결하세요.</target>
<targetstate="translated">Nie można rozpoznać niejawnego wystąpienia konstrukcji ogólnej w tym miejscu lub w jego pobliżu, ponieważ może to spowodować powstanie wielu niepowiązanych typów, na przykład „{0}” i „{1}”. Rozważ użycie adnotacji typu w celu rozwiązania niejednoznaczności</target>
<source>Could not resolve the ambiguity inherent in the use of the operator '{0}' at or near this program point. Consider using type annotations to resolve the ambiguity.</source>
<targetstate="translated">Nie można rozwiązać odziedziczonej niejednoznaczności w przypadku użycia operatora „{0}” w tym punkcie programu lub w jego pobliżu. Rozważ użycie adnotacji typu w celu rozwiązania niejednoznaczności.</target>
<targetstate="translated">A instanciação implícita do constructo genérico neste ponto ou próximo a ele não pode ser resolvida porque ele conseguiu resolver tipos não relacionados múltiplos, por exemplo '{0}' e '{1}'. Considere usar anotações de tipo para resolver a ambiguidade</target>
<source>Could not resolve the ambiguity inherent in the use of the operator '{0}' at or near this program point. Consider using type annotations to resolve the ambiguity.</source>
<targetstate="translated">Não foi possível resolver a ambiguidade no uso de um operador '{0}' neste ponto do programa ou próximo a ele. Considere usar anotações de tipo para resolver a ambiguidade.</target>
<targetstate="translated">Неявное создание экземпляров базовой конструкции в данной точке или рядом с ней не может быть разрешено, так как тогда возможно разрешение в несколько несвязанных типов, напр. "{0}" и "{1}". Рекомендуется использовать аннотации типа для решения неоднозначности</target>
<source>Could not resolve the ambiguity inherent in the use of the operator '{0}' at or near this program point. Consider using type annotations to resolve the ambiguity.</source>
<targetstate="translated">Не удалось разрешить неоднозначность, унаследованную в использовании оператора "{0}" в данной точке программы или рядом с ней. Рекомендуется использовать аннотации типа для решения неоднозначности.</target>
<targetstate="translated">Genel yapının bu konumda veya yakınında örtük olarak örneklenmesi çözümlenemedi, çünkü ilişkisiz birden çok türe çözümlenebiliyordu, örn. '{0}' ve '{1}'. Belirsizliği çözümlemek için tür ek açıklamaları kullanmayı düşünün</target>
<source>Could not resolve the ambiguity inherent in the use of the operator '{0}' at or near this program point. Consider using type annotations to resolve the ambiguity.</source>
<targetstate="translated">'{0}' işlecinin bu program noktasında veya yakınında kullanılmasında bulunan belirsizlik çözümlenemedi. Bu belirsizliği çözmek için tür ek açıklamaları kullanmayı düşünün.</target>
<source>Could not resolve the ambiguity inherent in the use of the operator '{0}' at or near this program point. Consider using type annotations to resolve the ambiguity.</source>
<source>Could not resolve the ambiguity inherent in the use of the operator '{0}' at or near this program point. Consider using type annotations to resolve the ambiguity.</source>
//<Expects status="error" span="(12,14-12,15)" id="FS0039">The value, namespace, type or module 'm' is not defined</Expects>
//<Expects status="error" span="(12,23-12,24)" id="FS0039">The value, namespace, type or module 'n' is not defined</Expects>
//<Expects status="notin" span="(12,21-12,22)" id="FS0332">Could not resolve the ambiguity inherent in the use of the operator '\( \+ \)' at or near this program point\. Consider using type annotations to resolve the ambiguity\.$</Expects>
//<Expects status="error" span="(11,14-11,15)" id="FS0039">The value, namespace, type or module 'm' is not defined</Expects>
//<Expects status="error" span="(11,23-11,24)" id="FS0039">The value, namespace, type or module 'n' is not defined</Expects>
//<Expects status="error" span="(5,5-5,52)" id="FS0332">Could not resolve the ambiguity inherent in the use of the operator 'someFunc' at or near this program point\. Consider using type annotations to resolve the ambiguity\.$</Expects>
//<Expects status="error" span="(5,5-5,52)" id="FS0071">Type constraint mismatch when applying the default type 'obj' for a type inference variable\. The type 'obj' does not support the operator 'someFunc' Consider adding further type constraints$</Expects>
//<Expects status="error" span="(4,5-4,52)" id="FS0071">Type constraint mismatch when applying the default type 'obj' for a type inference variable\. The type 'obj' does not support the operator 'someFunc' Consider adding further type constraints$</Expects>
