- 16 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Markus Hauge 提交于
-
- 08 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Damian Hickey 提交于
As discussed in #1505
-
- 07 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sayed Ibrahim Hashimi 提交于
-
- 06 5月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 LunicLynx 提交于
-
由 LunicLynx 提交于
More Information http://blogs.msdn.com/b/msbuild/archive/2008/02/11/what-s-up-with-xxx-sln-cache.aspx
-
- 22 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Schulz 提交于
-
- 05 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emil Lerch 提交于
-
- 29 1月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emil Lerch 提交于
As of Visual Studio 2015 CTP5 the Roslyn cache and suo files are stored in a .vs/ directory.
-
- 21 1月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Astbury 提交于
-
- 05 1月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 MOROZILnic 提交于
Ignoring *.cache as well as *.Cache
-
- 12 12月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Bodenmiller 提交于
-
- 23 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Todd Aspeotis 提交于
Revert "adding entry for ignoring <solutionname>.sln.ide folder which contains visual studio 2015 solution specific cache data" This reverts commit b07a0904.
-
- 16 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 robertob 提交于
adding entry for ignoring <solutionname>.sln.ide folder which contains visual studio 2015 solution specific cache data
-
- 24 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Janno Põldma 提交于
-
- 21 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 alexanderKhaustov 提交于
-
- 17 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Khaustov 提交于
-
- 09 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sayed Ibrahim Hashimi 提交于
-
- 20 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Bodenmiller 提交于
-
- 10 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Victor Boctor 提交于
I haven't found good documentation for this file online, but it is a user based file that should be ignored.
-
- 09 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mustafa Arif 提交于
-
- 05 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mads Kristensen 提交于
This files is generated by Visual Studio 2013 and should be ignored.
-
- 11 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Bodenmiller 提交于
user passwords are stored in *.user files so it is only database connection strings that are not protected.
-
- 10 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Bodenmiller 提交于
https://github.com/github/gitignore/commit/08def965cd1c0241a7cffbe7c26a74b3cab61243 incorrect states that commenting *.pubxml will keep your passwords hidden when it will actually do the opposite. This clarifies what commenting *.pubxml does and warns you of the dangers.
-
- 08 7月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Carl Suster 提交于
-
由 Carl Suster 提交于
Amends #1131 See these resources for explanation: http://docs.nuget.org/docs/reference/package-restore http://docs.nuget.org/docs/workflows/using-nuget-without-committing-packages
-
- 05 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Terje Sandstrom 提交于
Removed the separate top-level patterns for NuGet in accordance with comments in PR. Will now match version 2.0.1.
-
- 03 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Terje Sandstrom 提交于
Fixed pattern for excluding nuget packages so that it works both for top level package folder and for any lower level package folders. Re-include patterns fixed the same way.
-
- 18 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adilson Carvalho 提交于
When installing SQLite embebed on my C# project I've noted that it generates both directories, `x86` and `x64` but only `x64` was present on `.gitignore`.
-
- 12 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 James Ottaway 提交于
Building NuGet packages locally with `NuGet.exe pack <name>.nuspec` generates a `<name>.<version>.nupkg` file which should never be versioned.
-
- 07 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mateusz Wolsza 提交于
-
- 06 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mateusz Wolsza 提交于
"Releases" directory is created by Shimmer/Squirrel installer for example. It also should be ignored.
-
- 23 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bohdan Shulha 提交于
-
- 17 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kevin Pilch-Bisson 提交于
-
- 14 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrew Arnott 提交于
-
- 11 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Justin Howlett 提交于
Without the asterisk at the end of the directory's path, an exception for a file within this directory does not work. (ex. !packages/repositories.config) This reverts commit 0fb0fbef.
-
- 04 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jamie Humphries 提交于
This was ignoring .ncrunchproject and .ncrunchsolution files. NCrunch recommend that both of these files are checked in to source control.
-
- 06 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ashic Mahtab 提交于
-
- 02 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Carl Suster 提交于
-
- 01 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Steve Ziuchkovski 提交于
-
- 28 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 James Chambers 提交于
Submitting this for consideration. The first thing that I do on every new project is to go in and uncomment the packages folder. With the prevalence of NuGet and prominence of its use in the Visual Studio environment, along with how well package restore *just works* now, I believe this should be the default. While I understand that package restore isn't on by default, I would argue that the types of developers using NuGet _and_ a distributed SCM are the types of developers that would omit the binaries from source control.
-