- 19 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sebastian Blei 提交于
Corrected URL, which linked to the `Should I check my node_modules folder into git?` readup.
-
- 24 1月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Carl Suster 提交于
-
- 02 1月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jenrik 提交于
Debug log from npm is now ignored
-
- 12 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stuart P. Bentley 提交于
-
- 01 10月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Stuart P. Bentley 提交于
This changes the comment to better explain what .lock-wscript is for (it's for the [obsolete][v0.8.0] node-waf build system), and moves it next to the other ignore pattern(s) for binary module compilation artifacts. [v0.8.0]: http://blog.nodejs.org/2012/06/25/node-v0-8-0/
-
由 Stuart P. Bentley 提交于
It's not the opinion of "some people", it's a conditional circumstance. Even proponents of checking node_modules into Git agree that you shouldn't do it when you're writing a module to be included as a dependency on npmjs.org: the advantage of checking node_modules into Git is only for fully-packaged apps, which is why the original comment was what it was.
-
- 13 8月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josh Whaley 提交于
Updated link for the dependency directory from [this](https://npmjs.org/doc/faq.html#Should-I-check-my-node_modules-folder-into-git) to [this](https://www.npmjs.org/doc/misc/npm-faq.html#should-i-check-my-node_modules-folder-into-git-).
-
- 08 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Scott J. Roberts 提交于
-
- 05 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 cheddar 提交于
And remove my own opinions...
-
- 04 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 cheddar 提交于
This is a PR to remove the opinionated lines from the Node.js .gitignore file. I do not believe that Github's pre-baked .gitignore files should be promulgating opinions, especially in a community that is as fresh as the Node.js community. Questions of what should be checked in should be a decision made on an organization-by-organization basis, or left up to the individual. Github's inclusion of opinion in these files puts unnecessary authority behind that opinion, which can have the negative side-effect of people following without thinking.
-
- 01 3月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Stuart P. Bentley 提交于
These aren't really common patterns in the Node world, and if a Node project includes one of these types as files, they're as likely to want to include them in the project as not (`*.csv` is as likely to be a data source as `*.json`).
-
由 Adam Roben 提交于
-
- 07 1月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Stuart P. Bentley 提交于
-
由 Stuart P. Bentley 提交于
-
由 Stuart P. Bentley 提交于
-
由 Stuart P. Bentley 提交于
This re-covers the http://nodejs.org/api/addons.html case for which the "build" directory was added in 00686415, but doesn't break cross-environment projects that use the build directory for including concatenated/minified source. Mazel tov!
-
由 Stuart P. Bentley 提交于
Now linking to the official npm FAQ entry (with tl;dr) rather than straight to mikeal's blog post
-
- 03 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stuart P. Bentley 提交于
The "build" directory is lost in this refactor, as many JS projects do wish to include a minified/concatenated version of their source in the "build" folder in source control.
-
- 27 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tim Perry 提交于
-
- 13 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ray Solomon 提交于
This is to exclude compiled code from nodejs addons. Reference: http://nodejs.org/api/addons.html
-
- 08 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dan Kerimdzhanov 提交于
-
- 06 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ivan Zuzak 提交于
-
- 08 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrej Mihajlov 提交于
-
- 06 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ankur Oberoi 提交于
according to the community since recent changes. see: http://www.mikealrogers.com/posts/nodemodules-in-git.html by @mikeal (cherry picked from commit 44b47ec5bd0222ccf55efe5bcdb8bd3c55271803)
-
- 30 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 indexzero 提交于
-
- 10 11月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Peat Bakke 提交于
-
- 09 11月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 amrnt 提交于
-