- 15 1月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
Submitted by: Neil Costigan <neil.costigan@celocom.com> PR:
-
- 13 1月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
1.2.3.4 . Also added new function OBJ_txt2obj().
-
- 11 1月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 10 1月, 1999 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
auto generated but not auto updated so it is included. Also remove the encryption from the sample DSA keys.
-
- 08 1月, 1999 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 07 1月, 1999 5 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
Contributed by: Anonymous <nobody@replay.com>
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
Contributed by: Bodo Moeller <3moeller@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
soon - I intend to do a lot of it!).
-
- 06 1月, 1999 2 次提交
-
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
DSA_free(): this was causing crashes when for example an attempt was made to handle a (currently) unsupported DH public key. Also X509_PUBKEY_set()i wasn't checking errors from d2i_PublicKey().
-
- 05 1月, 1999 4 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
Submitted by: Arne Ansper <arne@ats.cyber.ee>
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
Submitted by: Arne Ansper <arne@ats.cyber.ee>
-
- 03 1月, 1999 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
in X509_STORE_new(), but document the fact that this variable is still unused in the certificate verification process.
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
handling to x509.c
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 02 1月, 1999 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
`openssl' and second, the shortcut symlinks for the `openssl <command>' are no longer created. This way we have a single and consistent command line interface `openssl <command>', similar to `cvs <command>'. Notice, the openssl.cnf, openssl.c and progs.pl files were changed after a repository copy, i.e. they still contain the complete file history.
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
zero unused bits.
-
由 Dr. Stephen Henson 提交于
-
- 01 1月, 1999 3 次提交
-
-
由 Paul C. Sutton 提交于
-
由 Paul C. Sutton 提交于
(including if user presses ^C)
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 31 12月, 1998 4 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
1. The already released version was 0.9.1c and not 0.9.1b 2. The next release should be 0.9.2 and not 0.9.1d, because first the changes are already too large, second we should avoid any more 0.9.1x confusions and third, the Apache version semantics of VERSION.REVISION.PATCHLEVEL for the version string is reasonable (and here .2 is already just a patchlevel and not major change). tVS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
由 stephen 提交于
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
- 30 12月, 1998 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 29 12月, 1998 4 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
由 Ben Laurie 提交于
-
- 26 12月, 1998 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
- 23 12月, 1998 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-
由 Ralf S. Engelschall 提交于
-