1. 15 7月, 2011 1 次提交
    • M
      btrfs: don't BUG_ON btrfs_alloc_path() errors · d8926bb3
      Mark Fasheh 提交于
      This patch fixes many callers of btrfs_alloc_path() which BUG_ON allocation
      failure. All the sites that are fixed in this patch were checked by me to
      be fairly trivial to fix because of at least one of two criteria:
      
       - Callers of the function catch errors from it already so bubbling the
         error up will be handled.
       - Callers of the function might BUG_ON any nonzero return code in which
         case there is no behavior changed (but we still got to remove a BUG_ON)
      
      The following functions were updated:
      
      btrfs_lookup_extent, alloc_reserved_tree_block, btrfs_remove_block_group,
      btrfs_lookup_csums_range, btrfs_csum_file_blocks, btrfs_mark_extent_written,
      btrfs_inode_by_name, btrfs_new_inode, btrfs_symlink,
      insert_reserved_file_extent, and run_delalloc_nocow
      Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
      d8926bb3
  2. 25 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  3. 13 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  4. 09 6月, 2011 2 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: fix the allocator loop logic · 723bda20
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      I was testing with empty_cluster = 0 to try and reproduce a problem and kept
      hitting early enospc panics.  This was because our loop logic was a little
      confused.  So this is what I did
      
      1) Make the loop variable the ultimate decider on wether we should loop again
      isntead of checking to see if we had an uncached bg, empty size or empty
      cluster.
      
      2) Increment loop before checking to see what we are on to make the loop
      definitions make more sense.
      
      3) If we are on the chunk alloc loop don't set empty_size/empty_cluster to 0
      unless we didn't actually allocate a chunk.  If we did allocate a chunk we
      should be able to easily setup a new cluster so clearing
      empty_size/empty_cluster makes us less efficient.
      
      This kept me from hitting panics while trying to reproduce the other problem.
      Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      723bda20
    • J
      Btrfs: don't commit the transaction if we dont have enough pinned bytes · f2bb8f5c
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      I noticed when running an enospc test that we would get stuck committing the
      transaction in check_data_space even though we truly didn't have enough space.
      So check to see if bytes_pinned is bigger than num_bytes, if it's not don't
      commit the transaction.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      f2bb8f5c
  5. 04 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  6. 24 5月, 2011 9 次提交
    • T
      Btrfs: BUG_ON is deleted from the caller of btrfs_truncate_item & btrfs_extend_item · 1cd30799
      Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
      Currently, btrfs_truncate_item and btrfs_extend_item returns only 0.
      So, the check by BUG_ON in the caller is unnecessary.
      Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      1cd30799
    • S
      btrfs: don't spin in shrink_delalloc if there is nothing to free · c4f675cd
      Sergei Trofimovich 提交于
      Observed as a large delay when --mixed filesystem is filled up.
      Test example:
      1. create tiny --mixed FS:
         $ dd if=/dev/zero of=2G.img seek=$((2048 * 1024 * 1024 - 1)) count=1 bs=1
         $ mkfs.btrfs --mixed 2G.img
         $ mount -oloop 2G.img /mnt/ut/
      2. Try to fill it up:
         $ dd if=/dev/urandom of=10M.file bs=10240 count=1024
         $ seq 1 256 | while read file_no; do echo $file_no; time cp 10M.file ${file_no}.copy; done
      
      Up to '200.copy' it goes fast, but when disk fills-up each -ENOSPC
      message takes 3 seconds to pop-up _every_ ENOSPC (and in usermode linux
      it's even more: 30-60 seconds!). (Maybe, time depends on kernel's timer resolution).
      
      No IO, no CPU load, just rescheduling. Some debugging revealed busy spinning
      in shrink_delalloc.
      Signed-off-by: NSergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
      Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      c4f675cd
    • J
      Btrfs: don't try to allocate from a block group that doesn't have enough space · cca1c81f
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      If we have a very large filesystem, we can spend a lot of time in
      find_free_extent just trying to allocate from empty block groups.  So instead
      check to see if the block group even has enough space for the allocation, and if
      not go on to the next block group.
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      cca1c81f
    • J
      Btrfs: don't always do readahead · 026fd317
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Our readahead is sort of sloppy, and really isn't always needed.  For example if
      ls is doing a stating ls (which is the default) it's going to stat in non-disk
      order, so if say you have a directory with a stupid amount of files, readahead
      is going to do nothing but waste time in the case of doing the stat.  Taking the
      unconditional readahead out made my test go from 57 minutes to 36 minutes.  This
      means that everywhere we do loop through the tree we want to make sure we do set
      path->reada properly, so I went through and found all of the places where we
      loop through the path and set reada to 1.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      026fd317
    • J
      Btrfs: try not to sleep as much when doing slow caching · 589d8ade
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      When the fs is super full and we unmount the fs, we could get stuck in this
      thing where unmount is waiting for the caching kthread to make progress and the
      caching kthread keeps scheduling because we're in the middle of a commit.  So
      instead just let the caching kthread keep going and only yeild if
      need_resched().  This makes my horrible umount case go from taking up to 10
      minutes to taking less than 20 seconds.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      589d8ade
    • J
      Btrfs: kill BTRFS_I(inode)->block_group · d82a6f1d
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Originally this was going to be used as a way to give hints to the allocator,
      but frankly we can get much better hints elsewhere and it's not even used at all
      for anything usefull.  In addition to be completely useless, when we initialize
      an inode we try and find a freeish block group to set as the inodes block group,
      and with a completely full 40gb fs this takes _forever_, so I imagine with say
      1tb fs this is just unbearable.  So just axe the thing altoghether, we don't
      need it and it saves us 8 bytes in the inode and saves us 500 microseconds per
      inode lookup in my testcase.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      d82a6f1d
    • J
      Btrfs: fix how we do space reservation for truncate · fcb80c2a
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      The ceph guys keep running into problems where we have space reserved in our
      orphan block rsv when freeing it up.  This is because they tend to do snapshots
      alot, so their truncates tend to use a bunch of space, so when we go to do
      things like update the inode we have to steal reservation space in order to make
      the reservation happen.  This happens because truncate can use as much space as
      it freaking feels like, but we still have to hold space for removing the orphan
      item and updating the inode, which will definitely always happen.  So in order
      to fix this we need to split all of the reservation stuf up.  So with this patch
      we have
      
      1) The orphan block reserve which only holds the space for deleting our orphan
      item when everything is over.
      
      2) The truncate block reserve which gets allocated and used specifically for the
      space that the truncate will use on a per truncate basis.
      
      3) The transaction will always have 1 item's worth of data reserved so we can
      update the inode normally.
      
      Hopefully this will make the ceph problem go away.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      fcb80c2a
    • J
      Btrfs: kill trans_mutex · a4abeea4
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      We use trans_mutex for lots of things, here's a basic list
      
      1) To serialize trans_handles joining the currently running transaction
      2) To make sure that no new trans handles are started while we are committing
      3) To protect the dead_roots list and the transaction lists
      
      Really the serializing trans_handles joining is not too hard, and can really get
      bogged down in acquiring a reference to the transaction.  So replace the
      trans_mutex with a trans_lock spinlock and use it to do the following
      
      1) Protect fs_info->running_transaction.  All trans handles have to do is check
      this, and then take a reference of the transaction and keep on going.
      2) Protect the fs_info->trans_list.  This doesn't get used too much, basically
      it just holds the current transactions, which will usually just be the currently
      committing transaction and the currently running transaction at most.
      3) Protect the dead roots list.  This is only ever processed by splicing the
      list so this is relatively simple.
      4) Protect the fs_info->reloc_ctl stuff.  This is very lightweight and was using
      the trans_mutex before, so this is a pretty straightforward change.
      5) Protect fs_info->no_trans_join.  Because we don't hold the trans_lock over
      the entirety of the commit we need to have a way to block new people from
      creating a new transaction while we're doing our work.  So we set no_trans_join
      and in join_transaction we test to see if that is set, and if it is we do a
      wait_on_commit.
      6) Make the transaction use count atomic so we don't need to take locks to
      modify it when we're dropping references.
      7) Add a commit_lock to the transaction to make sure multiple people trying to
      commit the same transaction don't race and commit at the same time.
      8) Make open_ioctl_trans an atomic so we don't have to take any locks for ioctl
      trans.
      
      I have tested this with xfstests, but obviously it is a pretty hairy change so
      lots of testing is greatly appreciated.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      a4abeea4
    • J
      Btrfs: take away the num_items argument from btrfs_join_transaction · 7a7eaa40
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      I keep forgetting that btrfs_join_transaction() just ignores the num_items
      argument, which leads me to sending pointless patches and looking stupid :).  So
      just kill the num_items argument from btrfs_join_transaction and
      btrfs_start_ioctl_transaction, since neither of them use it.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      7a7eaa40
  7. 21 5月, 2011 1 次提交
    • M
      btrfs: implement delayed inode items operation · 16cdcec7
      Miao Xie 提交于
      Changelog V5 -> V6:
      - Fix oom when the memory load is high, by storing the delayed nodes into the
        root's radix tree, and letting btrfs inodes go.
      
      Changelog V4 -> V5:
      - Fix the race on adding the delayed node to the inode, which is spotted by
        Chris Mason.
      - Merge Chris Mason's incremental patch into this patch.
      - Fix deadlock between readdir() and memory fault, which is reported by
        Itaru Kitayama.
      
      Changelog V3 -> V4:
      - Fix nested lock, which is reported by Itaru Kitayama, by updating space cache
        inode in time.
      
      Changelog V2 -> V3:
      - Fix the race between the delayed worker and the task which does delayed items
        balance, which is reported by Tsutomu Itoh.
      - Modify the patch address David Sterba's comment.
      - Fix the bug of the cpu recursion spinlock, reported by Chris Mason
      
      Changelog V1 -> V2:
      - break up the global rb-tree, use a list to manage the delayed nodes,
        which is created for every directory and file, and used to manage the
        delayed directory name index items and the delayed inode item.
      - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed nodes.
      
      Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs
      is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions,
      such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on.
      
      If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the
      performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name
      index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update.
      
      Implementation:
      - introduce a delayed root object into the filesystem, that use two lists to
        manage the delayed nodes which are created for every file/directory.
        One is used to manage all the delayed nodes that have delayed items. And the
        other is used to manage the delayed nodes which is waiting to be dealt with
        by the work thread.
      - Every delayed node has two rb-tree, one is used to manage the directory name
        index which is going to be inserted into b+ tree, and the other is used to
        manage the directory name index which is going to be deleted from b+ tree.
      - introduce a worker to deal with the delayed operation. This worker is used
        to deal with the works of the delayed directory name index items insertion
        and deletion and the delayed inode update.
        When the delayed items is beyond the lower limit, we create works for some
        delayed nodes and insert them into the work queue of the worker, and then
        go back.
        When the delayed items is beyond the upper bound, we create works for all
        the delayed nodes that haven't been dealt with, and insert them into the work
        queue of the worker, and then wait for that the untreated items is below some
        threshold value.
      - When we want to insert a directory name index into b+ tree, we just add the
        information into the delayed inserting rb-tree.
        And then we check the number of the delayed items and do delayed items
        balance. (The balance policy is above.)
      - When we want to delete a directory name index from the b+ tree, we search it
        in the inserting rb-tree at first. If we look it up, just drop it. If not,
        add the key of it into the delayed deleting rb-tree.
        Similar to the delayed inserting rb-tree, we also check the number of the
        delayed items and do delayed items balance.
        (The same to inserting manipulation)
      - When we want to update the metadata of some inode, we cached the data of the
        inode into the delayed node. the worker will flush it into the b+ tree after
        dealing with the delayed insertion and deletion.
      - We will move the delayed node to the tail of the list after we access the
        delayed node, By this way, we can cache more delayed items and merge more
        inode updates.
      - If we want to commit transaction, we will deal with all the delayed node.
      - the delayed node will be freed when we free the btrfs inode.
      - Before we log the inode items, we commit all the directory name index items
        and the delayed inode update.
      
      I did a quick test by the benchmark tool[1] and found we can improve the
      performance of file creation by ~15%, and file deletion by ~20%.
      
      Before applying this patch:
      Create files:
              Total files: 50000
              Total time: 1.096108
              Average time: 0.000022
      Delete files:
              Total files: 50000
              Total time: 1.510403
              Average time: 0.000030
      
      After applying this patch:
      Create files:
              Total files: 50000
              Total time: 0.932899
              Average time: 0.000019
      Delete files:
              Total files: 50000
              Total time: 1.215732
              Average time: 0.000024
      
      [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=128212635122920&q=p3
      
      Many thanks for Kitayama-san's help!
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dave@jikos.cz>
      Tested-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Tested-by: NItaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      16cdcec7
  8. 15 5月, 2011 1 次提交
    • L
      Btrfs: fix easily get into ENOSPC in mixed case · 1aba86d6
      liubo 提交于
      When a btrfs disk is created by mixed data & metadata option, it will have no
      pure data or pure metadata space info.
      
      In btrfs's for-linus branch, commit 78b1ea13838039cd88afdd62519b40b344d6c920
      (Btrfs: fix OOPS of empty filesystem after balance) initializes space infos at
      the very beginning.  The problem is this initialization does not take the mixed
      case into account, which will cause btrfs will easily get into ENOSPC in mixed
      case.
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      1aba86d6
  9. 06 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  10. 02 5月, 2011 4 次提交
  11. 26 4月, 2011 1 次提交
  12. 25 4月, 2011 3 次提交
    • L
      Btrfs: Support reading/writing on disk free ino cache · 82d5902d
      Li Zefan 提交于
      This is similar to block group caching.
      
      We dedicate a special inode in fs tree to save free ino cache.
      
      At the very first time we create/delete a file after mount, the free ino
      cache will be loaded from disk into memory. When the fs tree is commited,
      the cache will be written back to disk.
      
      To keep compatibility, we check the root generation against the generation
      of the special inode when loading the cache, so the loading will fail
      if the btrfs filesystem was mounted in an older kernel before.
      Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
      82d5902d
    • L
      Btrfs: Always use 64bit inode number · 33345d01
      Li Zefan 提交于
      There's a potential problem in 32bit system when we exhaust 32bit inode
      numbers and start to allocate big inode numbers, because btrfs uses
      inode->i_ino in many places.
      
      So here we always use BTRFS_I(inode)->location.objectid, which is an
      u64 variable.
      
      There are 2 exceptions that BTRFS_I(inode)->location.objectid !=
      inode->i_ino: the btree inode (0 vs 1) and empty subvol dirs (256 vs 2),
      and inode->i_ino will be used in those cases.
      
      Another reason to make this change is I'm going to use a special inode
      to save free ino cache, and the inode number must be > (u64)-256.
      Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
      33345d01
    • L
      Btrfs: Make free space cache code generic · 34d52cb6
      Li Zefan 提交于
      So we can re-use the code to cache free inode numbers.
      
      The change is quite straightforward. Two new structures are introduced.
      
      - struct btrfs_free_space_ctl
      
        We move those variables that are used for caching free space from
        struct btrfs_block_group_cache to this new struct.
      
      - struct btrfs_free_space_op
      
        We do block group specific work (e.g. calculation of extents threshold)
        through functions registered in this struct.
      
      And then we can remove references to struct btrfs_block_group_cache.
      Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
      34d52cb6
  13. 16 4月, 2011 2 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: avoid taking the chunk_mutex in do_chunk_alloc · 6d74119f
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Everytime we try to allocate disk space we try and see if we can pre-emptively
      allocate a chunk, but in the common case we don't allocate anything, so there is
      no sense in taking the chunk_mutex at all.  So instead if we are allocating a
      chunk, mark it in the space_info so we don't get two people trying to allocate
      at the same time.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
      6d74119f
    • C
      Btrfs: don't force chunk allocation in find_free_extent · 0e4f8f88
      Chris Mason 提交于
      find_free_extent likes to allocate in contiguous clusters,
      which makes writeback faster, especially on SSD storage.  As
      the FS fragments, these clusters become harder to find and we have
      to decide between allocating a new chunk to make more clusters
      or giving up on the cluster to allocate from the free space
      we have.
      
      Right now it creates too many chunks, and you can end up with
      a whole FS that is mostly empty metadata chunks.  This commit
      changes the allocation code to be more strict and only
      allocate new chunks when we've made good use of the chunks we
      already have.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      0e4f8f88
  14. 28 3月, 2011 10 次提交
    • L
      Btrfs: fix OOPS of empty filesystem after balance · c59021f8
      liubo 提交于
      btrfs will remove unused block groups after balance.
      When a empty filesystem is balanced, the block group with tag "DATA" may be
      dropped, and after umount and mount again, it will not find "DATA" space_info
      and lead to OOPS.
      So we initial the necessary space_infos(DATA, SYSTEM, METADATA) to avoid OOPS.
      Reported-by: NDaniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      c59021f8
    • L
      Btrfs: fix memory leak of empty filesystem after balance · 9f7c43c9
      liubo 提交于
      After Josef's patch(commit 3c14874a),
      btrfs will exclude super bytes when reading block groups(by marking a extent
      state UPTODATE).  However, these bytes do not get freed while balance remove
      unused block groups, and we won't process those removed ones any more, when
      we do umount and unload the btrfs module,  btrfs hits a memory leak.
      
      This patch add the missing free operation.
      
      Reproduce steps:
      $ mkfs.btrfs disk
      $ mount disk /mnt/btrfs -o loop
      $ btrfs filesystem balance /mnt/btrfs
      $ umount /mnt/btrfs
      $ rmmod btrfs
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      9f7c43c9
    • Y
      Btrfs: fix uncheck memory allocations · dac97e51
      Yoshinori Sano 提交于
      To make Btrfs code more robust, several return value checks where memory
      allocation can fail are introduced. I use BUG_ON where I don't know how
      to handle the error properly, which increases the number of using the
      notorious BUG_ON, though.
      Signed-off-by: NYoshinori Sano <yoshinori.sano@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      dac97e51
    • L
      Btrfs: add btrfs_trim_fs() to handle FITRIM · f7039b1d
      Li Dongyang 提交于
      We take an free extent out from allocator, trim it, then put it back,
      but before we trim the block group, we should make sure the block group is
      cached, so plus a little change to make cache_block_group() run without a
      transaction.
      Signed-off-by: NLi Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      f7039b1d
    • L
      Btrfs: adjust btrfs_discard_extent() return errors and trimmed bytes · 5378e607
      Li Dongyang 提交于
      Callers of btrfs_discard_extent() should check if we are mounted with -o discard,
      as we want to make fitrim to work even the fs is not mounted with -o discard.
      Also we should use REQ_DISCARD to map the free extent to get a full mapping,
      last we only return errors if
      1. the error is not a EOPNOTSUPP
      2. no device supports discard
      Signed-off-by: NLi Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      5378e607
    • L
      Btrfs: make update_reserved_bytes() public · b4d00d56
      Li Dongyang 提交于
      Make the function public as we should update the reserved extents calculations
      after taking out an extent for trimming.
      Signed-off-by: NLi Dongyang <lidongyang@novell.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      b4d00d56
    • M
      btrfs: use GFP_NOFS instead of GFP_KERNEL · fc0e4a31
      Miao Xie 提交于
      In the filesystem context, we must allocate memory by GFP_NOFS,
      or we may start another filesystem operation and make kswap thread hang up.
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      fc0e4a31
    • T
      Btrfs: check return value of read_tree_block() · 97d9a8a4
      Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
      This patch is checking return value of read_tree_block(),
      and if it is NULL, error processing.
      Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      97d9a8a4
    • T
      Btrfs: cleanup some BUG_ON() · db5b493a
      Tsutomu Itoh 提交于
      This patch changes some BUG_ON() to the error return.
      (but, most callers still use BUG_ON())
      Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      db5b493a
    • L
      Btrfs: add initial tracepoint support for btrfs · 1abe9b8a
      liubo 提交于
      Tracepoints can provide insight into why btrfs hits bugs and be greatly
      helpful for debugging, e.g
                    dd-7822  [000]  2121.641088: btrfs_inode_request: root = 5(FS_TREE), gen = 4, ino = 256, blocks = 8, disk_i_size = 0, last_trans = 8, logged_trans = 0
                    dd-7822  [000]  2121.641100: btrfs_inode_new: root = 5(FS_TREE), gen = 8, ino = 257, blocks = 0, disk_i_size = 0, last_trans = 0, logged_trans = 0
       btrfs-transacti-7804  [001]  2146.935420: btrfs_cow_block: root = 2(EXTENT_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29368320 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29388800 (cow_level = 0)
       btrfs-transacti-7804  [001]  2146.935473: btrfs_cow_block: root = 1(ROOT_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29364224 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29392896 (cow_level = 0)
       btrfs-transacti-7804  [001]  2146.972221: btrfs_transaction_commit: root = 1(ROOT_TREE), gen = 8
         flush-btrfs-2-7821  [001]  2155.824210: btrfs_chunk_alloc: root = 3(CHUNK_TREE), offset = 1103101952, size = 1073741824, num_stripes = 1, sub_stripes = 0, type = DATA
         flush-btrfs-2-7821  [001]  2155.824241: btrfs_cow_block: root = 2(EXTENT_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29388800 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29396992 (cow_level = 0)
         flush-btrfs-2-7821  [001]  2155.824255: btrfs_cow_block: root = 4(DEV_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29372416 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29401088 (cow_level = 0)
         flush-btrfs-2-7821  [000]  2155.824329: btrfs_cow_block: root = 3(CHUNK_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 20971520 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 20975616 (cow_level = 0)
       btrfs-endio-wri-7800  [001]  2155.898019: btrfs_cow_block: root = 5(FS_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29384704 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29405184 (cow_level = 0)
       btrfs-endio-wri-7800  [001]  2155.898043: btrfs_cow_block: root = 7(CSUM_TREE), refs = 2, orig_buf = 29376512 (orig_level = 0), cow_buf = 29409280 (cow_level = 0)
      
      Here is what I have added:
      
      1) ordere_extent:
              btrfs_ordered_extent_add
              btrfs_ordered_extent_remove
              btrfs_ordered_extent_start
              btrfs_ordered_extent_put
      
      These provide critical information to understand how ordered_extents are
      updated.
      
      2) extent_map:
              btrfs_get_extent
      
      extent_map is used in both read and write cases, and it is useful for tracking
      how btrfs specific IO is running.
      
      3) writepage:
              __extent_writepage
              btrfs_writepage_end_io_hook
      
      Pages are cirtical resourses and produce a lot of corner cases during writeback,
      so it is valuable to know how page is written to disk.
      
      4) inode:
              btrfs_inode_new
              btrfs_inode_request
              btrfs_inode_evict
      
      These can show where and when a inode is created, when a inode is evicted.
      
      5) sync:
              btrfs_sync_file
              btrfs_sync_fs
      
      These show sync arguments.
      
      6) transaction:
              btrfs_transaction_commit
      
      In transaction based filesystem, it will be useful to know the generation and
      who does commit.
      
      7) back reference and cow:
      	btrfs_delayed_tree_ref
      	btrfs_delayed_data_ref
      	btrfs_delayed_ref_head
      	btrfs_cow_block
      
      Btrfs natively supports back references, these tracepoints are helpful on
      understanding btrfs's COW mechanism.
      
      8) chunk:
      	btrfs_chunk_alloc
      	btrfs_chunk_free
      
      Chunk is a link between physical offset and logical offset, and stands for space
      infomation in btrfs, and these are helpful on tracing space things.
      
      9) reserved_extent:
      	btrfs_reserved_extent_alloc
      	btrfs_reserved_extent_free
      
      These can show how btrfs uses its space.
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      1abe9b8a
  15. 18 3月, 2011 2 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: check items for correctness as we search · a826d6dc
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Currently if we have corrupted items things will blow up in spectacular ways.
      So as we read in blocks and they are leaves, check the entire leaf to make sure
      all of the items are correct and point to valid parts in the leaf for the item
      data the are responsible for.  If the item is corrupt we will kick back EIO and
      not read any of the copies since they are likely to not be correct either.  This
      will catch generic corruptions, it will be up to the individual callers of
      btrfs_search_slot to make sure their items are right.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      a826d6dc
    • J
      Btrfs: handle errors in btrfs_orphan_cleanup · 66b4ffd1
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      If we cannot truncate an inode for some reason we will never delete the orphan
      item associated with that inode, which means that we will loop forever in
      btrfs_orphan_cleanup.  Instead of doing this just return error so we fail to
      mount.  It sucks, but hey it's better than hanging.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      66b4ffd1