We want to know if there are debugging features compiled in, this may
affect performance. The message is printed before the sanity checks.
Also kill version.h file that serves no purpose, we don't use any
version tag for kernel module.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

And change the message level to KERN_INFO.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

The 'end' value must exactly cover the end of the interval, which means
one byte less than the expected block alignment, or in case of a file
smaller than one block, one byte less than the inode size.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Code checked for raid 5 flag in two else-if branches, so code would never be reached. Probably a copy-paste bug.
Signed-off-by: NHenrik Nordvik <henrikno@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Dave reported a panic because the extent_root->commit_root was NULL in the
caching kthread.  That is because we just unset it in free_root_pointers, which
is not the correct thing to do, we have to either wait for the caching kthread
to complete or hold the extent_commit_sem lock so we know the thread has exited.
This patch makes the kthreads all stop first and then we do our cleanup.  This
should fix the race.  Thanks,
Reported-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Commit be283b2e
(    Btrfs: use helper to cleanup tree roots) introduced the following bug,

 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000034
 IP: [<ffffffffa039368c>] extent_buffer_get+0x4/0xa [btrfs]
[...]
 Pid: 2463, comm: btrfs-cache-1 Tainted: G           O 3.9.0+ #4 innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox
 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa039368c>]  [<ffffffffa039368c>] extent_buffer_get+0x4/0xa [btrfs]
 Process btrfs-cache-1 (pid: 2463, threadinfo ffff880112d60000, task ffff880117679730)
[...]
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffffa0398a99>] btrfs_search_slot+0x104/0x64d [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa039aea4>] btrfs_next_old_leaf+0xa7/0x334 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa039b141>] btrfs_next_leaf+0x10/0x12 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa039ea13>] caching_thread+0x1a3/0x2e0 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa03d8811>] worker_loop+0x14b/0x48e [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa03d86c6>] ? btrfs_queue_worker+0x25c/0x25c [btrfs]
  [<ffffffff81068d3d>] kthread+0x8d/0x95
  [<ffffffff81068cb0>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x43/0x43
  [<ffffffff8151e5ac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
  [<ffffffff81068cb0>] ? kthread_freezable_should_stop+0x43/0x43
RIP  [<ffffffffa039368c>] extent_buffer_get+0x4/0xa [btrfs]

We've free'ed commit_root before actually getting to free block groups where
caching thread needs valid extent_root->commit_root.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Dave reported a NULL pointer deref.  This is caused because he thought he'd be
smart and add sanity checks to the extent_io bit operations, but he didn't
expect a tree to have a NULL mapping.  To fix this we just need to init the
relocation's processed_blocks with the btree_inode->i_mapping.  Thanks,
Reported-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

There is a path where btrfs_drop_inode() is called with its inode's root
is NULL: In btrfs_new_inode(), when btrfs_set_inode_index() fails,
iput() is called. We should handle this case before taking look at the
root->root_item.
Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naota@elisp.net>
Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

We get a use after free if we had a transaction to cleanup since there could be
delayed inodes which refer to their respective fs_root.  Thanks
Reported-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Btrfs has been pointer tagging bi_private and using bi_bdev
to store the stripe index and mirror number of failed IOs.

As bios bubble back up through the call chain, we use these
to decide if and how to retry our IOs.  They are also used
to count IO failures on a per device basis.

Recently a bio tracepoint was added lead to crashes because
we were abusing bi_bdev.

This commit adds a btrfs bioset, and creates explicit fields
for the mirror number and stripe index.  The plan is to
extend this structure for all of the fields currently in
struct btrfs_bio, which will mean one less kmalloc in
our IO path.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
Reported-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

If we fail to load the chunk tree we'll call free_root_pointers, except we may
not have assigned the roots for the dev_root/extent_root/csum_root yet, so we
could NULL pointer deref at this point.  Just add checks to make sure these
roots are set to keep us from panicing.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

The quota_tree was set up to use the empty_block_rsv before
which would be problematic when the filesystem is filled up
and ENOSPC happens during internal operations while the quota
tree is updated and COWed (when the btrfs_qgroup_info_item
items) are written. In fact, use_block_rsv() which is used
in btrfs_cow_block() falls back to the global_block_rsv in
this case. But just in order to make it more clear what is
happening, change it to explicitly use the global_block_rsv.
Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

end_bio_extent_readpage computes whole_page based on bv_offset and
bv_len, without taking into account that blk_update_request may modify
them when some of the blocks to be read into a page produce a read
error.  This would cause the read to unlock only part of the file
range associated with the page, which would in turn leave the entire
page locked, which would not only keep the process blocked instead of
returning -EIO to it, but also prevent any further access to the file.

It turns out that btrfs always issues whole-page reads and writes.
The special handling of non-whole_page appears to be a mistake or a
left-over from a time when this wasn't the case.  Indeed,
end_bio_extent_writepage distinguished between whole_page and
non-whole_page writes but behaved identically in both cases!

I've replaced the whole_page computations with warnings, just to be
sure that we're not issuing partial page reads or writes.  The
warnings should probably just go away some time.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

btrfs_invalidate_inodes() may sleep, so we should not invoke it in the
spin lock context. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

We have checked if ->node is NULL or not, so it is unnecessary to
use BUG_ON() to check again. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

The root node of the rb-tree may be changed, so we should get it under
the lock. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

inode_tree_del() will move the tree root into the dead root list, and
then the tree will be destroyed by the cleaner. So if we remove the
delayed node which is cached in the inode after inode_tree_del(),
we may access a freed tree root. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

We need to set return value explicitly, otherwise we'll lose the error
value.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Before applying this patch, we reserved the space for the global reserve
by the minimum unit if we found it is empty, it was unreasonable and
inefficient, because if the global reserve space was depleted, it implied
that the size of the global reserve was too small. In this case, we shoud
update the global reserve and fill it.

Cc: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

If the type of the space we need is different with the global reserve, we
can not steal the space from the global reserve, because we can not allocate
the space from the free space cache that the global reserve points to.

Cc: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

cc: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

It is very likely that there are lots of subvolumes/snapshots in the filesystem,
so if we use global block reservation to do inode cache truncation, we may hog
all the free space that is reserved in global rsv. So it is better that we do
the free space reservation for inode cache truncation by ourselves.

Cc: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

The filesystem with inode cache was forced to be read-only when we umounted it.

Steps to reproduce:
 # mkfs.btrfs -f ${DEV}
 # mount -o inode_cache ${DEV} ${MNT}
 # dd if=/dev/zero of=${MNT}/file1 bs=1M count=8192
 # btrfs fi syn ${MNT}
 # dd if=${MNT}/file1 of=/dev/null bs=1M
 # rm -f ${MNT}/file1
 # btrfs fi syn ${MNT}
 # umount ${MNT}

It is because there was no enough space to do inode cache truncation, and then
we aborted the current transaction.

But no space error is not a serious problem when we write out the inode cache,
and it is safe that we just skip this step if we meet this problem. So we need
not abort the current transaction.
Reported-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Raid5 with 3 devices is well defined while the old logic allowed
raid5 only with a minimum of 4 devices when converting the block group
profile via btrfs balance. Creating a raid5 with just three devices
using mkfs.btrfs worked always as expected. This is now fixed and the
whole logic is rewritten.
Signed-off-by: NAndreas Philipp <philipp.andreas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

In replace_path(), if read_tree_block() fails, we cannot return
directly, we should free some allocated memory otherwise memory
leak happens.

Similar to Wang's "Btrfs: fix possible memory leak in the
find_parent_nodes()" patch, the current commit fixes an issue that
is related to the "Btrfs: fix all callers of read_tree_block"
commit.
Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

In the find_parent_nodes(), if read_tree_block() fails, we can
not return directly, we should free some allocated memory otherwise
memory leak happens.
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

This is not yet supported and causes crashes. One sad user reported
that it destroyed his filesystem.

One failure is in __btrfs_map_block+0xc1f calling kmalloc(0).

0x5f21f is in __btrfs_map_block (fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4923).
4918                            num_stripes = map->num_stripes;
4919                            max_errors = nr_parity_stripes(map);
4920
4921                            raid_map = kmalloc(sizeof(u64) * num_stripes,
4922                                               GFP_NOFS);
4923                            if (!raid_map) {
4924                                    ret = -ENOMEM;
4925                                    goto out;
4926                            }
4927

There might be more issues. Until this is really tested, don't allow
users to start the procedure on RAID5/RAID6 filesystems.
Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Chris hit a bug where we weren't finding extent records when running extent ops.
This is because we use the delayed_ref_head when running the extent op, which
means we can't use the ->type checks to see if we are metadata.  We also lose
the level of the metadata we are working on.  So to fix this we can just check
the ->is_data section of the extent_op, and we can store the level of the buffer
we were modifying in the extent_op.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

This catches block groups that are too large to properly cache.  We deal with
this case fine, so the warning just confuses users.  Remove the warning.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

I'm sorry, theres no excuse for this sort of work.  We need to use
root->leafsize since eb may be NULL.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

The search ioctl skips items that are too large for a result buffer, but
inline items of a certain size occuring before any search result is
found would trigger an overflow and stop the search entirely.

Bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57641

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NGabriel de Perthuis <g2p.code+btrfs@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

lock_extent/unlock_extent expect an exclusive end.
Tested-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Quota tree has been missing from lockdep annotations, though no warning
has been seen in the wild.

There's currently one entry that does not belong there,
BTRFS_ORPHAN_OBJECTID.  No such tree exists, it's probably a copy &
paste mistake, the id is defined among tree ids.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

We've added new checks to make sure the super block crc is correct
during mount.  A fresh filesystem from an older mkfs won't have the
crc set.  This adds a warning when it finds a newly created filesystem
but doesn't fail the mount.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

The superblock checksum is not verified upon mount. <awkward silence>

Add that check and also reorder existing checks to a more logical
order.

Current mkfs.btrfs does not calculate the correct checksum of
super_block and thus a freshly created filesytem will fail to mount when
this patch is applied.

First transaction commit calculates correct superblock checksum and
saves it to disk.

Reproducer:
$ mfks.btrfs /dev/sda
$ mount /dev/sda /mnt
$ btrfs scrub start /mnt
$ sleep 5
$ btrfs scrub status /mnt
... super:2 ...
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

The variable was named 'data' in btrfs_reserve_extent and that's the
only function that actually uses it to let btrfs_get_alloc_profile know
what profile we want. Then it's passed down as u64 flags.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>