1. 11 7月, 2009 2 次提交
  2. 04 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  3. 25 12月, 2008 1 次提交
  4. 21 4月, 2008 1 次提交
    • K
      [CRYPTO] all: Clean up init()/fini() · 3af5b90b
      Kamalesh Babulal 提交于
      On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 03:40:36PM +0100, Bodo Eggert wrote:
      > Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
      > 
      > > This patch cleanups the crypto code, replaces the init() and fini()
      > > with the <algorithm name>_init/_fini
      > 
      > This part ist OK.
      > 
      > > or init/fini_<algorithm name> (if the 
      > > <algorithm name>_init/_fini exist)
      > 
      > Having init_foo and foo_init won't be a good thing, will it? I'd start
      > confusing them.
      > 
      > What about foo_modinit instead?
      
      Thanks for the suggestion, the init() is replaced with
      
      	<algorithm name>_mod_init ()
      
      and fini () is replaced with <algorithm name>_mod_fini.
      Signed-off-by: NKamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      3af5b90b
  5. 11 1月, 2008 1 次提交
  6. 02 11月, 2007 1 次提交
  7. 11 10月, 2007 2 次提交
  8. 21 9月, 2006 1 次提交
  9. 26 6月, 2006 3 次提交
  10. 10 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  11. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4