提交 a4a6198b 编写于 作者: J Jan Beulich 提交者: Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] tvec_bases too large for per-cpu data

With internal Xen-enabled kernels we see the kernel's static per-cpu data
area exceed the limit of 32k on x86-64, and even native x86-64 kernels get
fairly close to that limit.  I generally question whether it is reasonable
to have data structures several kb in size allocated as per-cpu data when
the space there is rather limited.

The biggest arch-independent consumer is tvec_bases (over 4k on 32-bit
archs, over 8k on 64-bit ones), which now gets converted to use dynamically
allocated memory instead.
Signed-off-by: NJan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
上级 c98d8cfb
......@@ -86,7 +86,8 @@ struct tvec_t_base_s {
} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
typedef struct tvec_t_base_s tvec_base_t;
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(tvec_base_t, tvec_bases);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(tvec_base_t *, tvec_bases);
static tvec_base_t boot_tvec_bases;
static inline void set_running_timer(tvec_base_t *base,
struct timer_list *timer)
......@@ -157,7 +158,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__init_timer_base);
void fastcall init_timer(struct timer_list *timer)
{
timer->entry.next = NULL;
timer->base = &per_cpu(tvec_bases, raw_smp_processor_id()).t_base;
timer->base = &per_cpu(tvec_bases, raw_smp_processor_id())->t_base;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(init_timer);
......@@ -218,7 +219,7 @@ int __mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires)
ret = 1;
}
new_base = &__get_cpu_var(tvec_bases);
new_base = __get_cpu_var(tvec_bases);
if (base != &new_base->t_base) {
/*
......@@ -258,7 +259,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__mod_timer);
*/
void add_timer_on(struct timer_list *timer, int cpu)
{
tvec_base_t *base = &per_cpu(tvec_bases, cpu);
tvec_base_t *base = per_cpu(tvec_bases, cpu);
unsigned long flags;
BUG_ON(timer_pending(timer) || !timer->function);
......@@ -504,7 +505,7 @@ unsigned long next_timer_interrupt(void)
}
hr_expires += jiffies;
base = &__get_cpu_var(tvec_bases);
base = __get_cpu_var(tvec_bases);
spin_lock(&base->t_base.lock);
expires = base->timer_jiffies + (LONG_MAX >> 1);
list = NULL;
......@@ -901,7 +902,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(xtime_lock);
*/
static void run_timer_softirq(struct softirq_action *h)
{
tvec_base_t *base = &__get_cpu_var(tvec_bases);
tvec_base_t *base = __get_cpu_var(tvec_bases);
hrtimer_run_queues();
if (time_after_eq(jiffies, base->timer_jiffies))
......@@ -1256,12 +1257,32 @@ asmlinkage long sys_sysinfo(struct sysinfo __user *info)
return 0;
}
static void __devinit init_timers_cpu(int cpu)
static int __devinit init_timers_cpu(int cpu)
{
int j;
tvec_base_t *base;
base = &per_cpu(tvec_bases, cpu);
base = per_cpu(tvec_bases, cpu);
if (!base) {
static char boot_done;
/*
* Cannot do allocation in init_timers as that runs before the
* allocator initializes (and would waste memory if there are
* more possible CPUs than will ever be installed/brought up).
*/
if (boot_done) {
base = kmalloc_node(sizeof(*base), GFP_KERNEL,
cpu_to_node(cpu));
if (!base)
return -ENOMEM;
memset(base, 0, sizeof(*base));
} else {
base = &boot_tvec_bases;
boot_done = 1;
}
per_cpu(tvec_bases, cpu) = base;
}
spin_lock_init(&base->t_base.lock);
for (j = 0; j < TVN_SIZE; j++) {
INIT_LIST_HEAD(base->tv5.vec + j);
......@@ -1273,6 +1294,7 @@ static void __devinit init_timers_cpu(int cpu)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(base->tv1.vec + j);
base->timer_jiffies = jiffies;
return 0;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
......@@ -1295,8 +1317,8 @@ static void __devinit migrate_timers(int cpu)
int i;
BUG_ON(cpu_online(cpu));
old_base = &per_cpu(tvec_bases, cpu);
new_base = &get_cpu_var(tvec_bases);
old_base = per_cpu(tvec_bases, cpu);
new_base = get_cpu_var(tvec_bases);
local_irq_disable();
spin_lock(&new_base->t_base.lock);
......@@ -1326,7 +1348,8 @@ static int __devinit timer_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
long cpu = (long)hcpu;
switch(action) {
case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
init_timers_cpu(cpu);
if (init_timers_cpu(cpu) < 0)
return NOTIFY_BAD;
break;
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
case CPU_DEAD:
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册