x86, irq: Check move_in_progress before freeing the vector mapping

With the recent irq migration fixes (post 2.6.32), Gary Hade has noticed
"No IRQ handler for vector" messages during the 2.6.33-rc1 kernel boot on IBM
AMD platforms and root caused the issue to this commit:

> commit 23359a88
> Author: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
> Date:   Mon Oct 26 14:24:33 2009 -0800
>
>    x86: Remove move_cleanup_count from irq_cfg

As part of this patch, we have removed the move_cleanup_count check
in smp_irq_move_cleanup_interrupt(). With this change, we can run into a
situation where an irq cleanup interrupt on a cpu can cleanup the vector
mappings associated with multiple irqs, of which one of the irq's migration
might be still in progress. As such when that irq hits the old cpu, we get
the "No IRQ handler" messages.

Fix this by checking for the irq_cfg's move_in_progress and if the move
is still in progress delay the vector cleanup to another irq cleanup
interrupt request (which will happen when the irq starts arriving at the
new cpu destination).
Reported-and-tested-by: NGary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <1262804191.2732.7.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>

arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c

@@ -2434,6 +2434,13 @@ asmlinkage void smp_irq_move_cleanup_interrupt(void)
 		cfg = irq_cfg(irq);
 		raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock);
 
+		/*
+		 * Check if the irq migration is in progress. If so, we
+		 * haven't received the cleanup request yet for this irq.
+		 */
+		if (cfg->move_in_progress)
+			goto unlock;
+
 		if (vector == cfg->vector && cpumask_test_cpu(me, cfg->domain))
 			goto unlock;