提交 6305f498 编写于 作者: D David Woodhouse 提交者: John W. Linville

libertas: fix sanity check on sequence number in command response

Slightly more useful if we compare it against the sequence number of the
command we have outstanding, rather than comparing the reply with itself.

Doh. Pointed out by Sebastian Siewior
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NDan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
上级 c2f2d3a0
......@@ -572,9 +572,9 @@ int lbs_process_rx_command(struct lbs_private *priv)
respcmd, le16_to_cpu(resp->seqnum), priv->upld_len, jiffies);
lbs_deb_hex(LBS_DEB_HOST, "CMD_RESP", (void *) resp, priv->upld_len);
if (resp->seqnum != resp->seqnum) {
if (resp->seqnum != priv->cur_cmd->cmdbuf->seqnum) {
lbs_pr_info("Received CMD_RESP with invalid sequence %d (expected %d)\n",
le16_to_cpu(resp->seqnum), le16_to_cpu(resp->seqnum));
le16_to_cpu(resp->seqnum), le16_to_cpu(priv->cur_cmd->cmdbuf->seqnum));
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->driver_lock, flags);
ret = -1;
goto done;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册