提交 2c4ee8f9 编写于 作者: N Nishanth Aravamudan 提交者: David S. Miller

[LTPC]: Replace schedule_timeout() with ssleep()/msleep()

Use ssleep() / msleep() [as appropriate]
instead of schedule_timeout() to guarantee the task delays as expected.
Signed-off-by: NNishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>
Signed-off-by: NMaximilian Attems <janitor@sternwelten.at>
Signed-off-by: NDomen Puncer <domen@coderock.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 ebc3f64b
......@@ -1109,8 +1109,7 @@ struct net_device * __init ltpc_probe(void)
inb_p(io+1);
inb_p(io+3);
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
schedule_timeout(2*HZ/100);
msleep(20);
inb_p(io+0);
inb_p(io+2);
......@@ -1120,8 +1119,7 @@ struct net_device * __init ltpc_probe(void)
inb_p(io+5); /* enable dma */
inb_p(io+6); /* tri-state interrupt line */
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
schedule_timeout(HZ);
ssleep(1);
/* now, figure out which dma channel we're using, unless it's
already been specified */
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册