mm: do not use double negation for testing page flags

With the discussion[1], I found it seems there are every PageFlags
functions return bool at this moment so we don't need double negation
any more.  Although it's not a problem to keep it, it makes future users
confused to use double negation for them, too.

Remove such possibility.

[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=148881578820434

Frankly sepaking, I like every PageFlags to return bool instead of int.
It will make it clear.  AFAIR, Chen Gang had tried it but don't know why
it was not merged at that time.

http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1469336184-1904-1-git-send-email-chengang@emindsoft.com.cn

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1488868597-32222-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

mm/khugepaged.c

@@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static int __collapse_huge_page_isolate(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 		 * The page must only be referenced by the scanned process
 		 * and page swap cache.
 		 */
-		if (page_count(page) != 1 + !!PageSwapCache(page)) {
+		if (page_count(page) != 1 + PageSwapCache(page)) {
 			unlock_page(page);
 			result = SCAN_PAGE_COUNT;
 			goto out;
@@ -1181,7 +1181,7 @@ static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm,
 		 * The page must only be referenced by the scanned process
 		 * and page swap cache.
 		 */
-		if (page_count(page) != 1 + !!PageSwapCache(page)) {
+		if (page_count(page) != 1 + PageSwapCache(page)) {
 			result = SCAN_PAGE_COUNT;
 			goto out_unmap;
 		}