提交 10389536 编写于 作者: S Stefan Richter

firewire: core: check for 1394a compliant IRM, fix inaccessibility of Sony camcorder

Per IEEE 1394 clause 8.4.2.3, a contender for the IRM role shall check
whether the current IRM complies to 1394a-2000 or later.  If not force a
compliant node (e.g. itself) to become IRM.  This was implemented in the
older ieee1394 driver but not yet in firewire-core.

An older Sony camcorder (Sony DCR-TRV25) which implements 1394-1995 IRM
but neither 1394a-2000 IRM nor BM was now found to cause an
interoperability bug:
  - Camcorder becomes root node when plugged in, hence gets IRM role.
  - firewire-core successfully contends for BM role, proceeds to perform
    gap count optimization and resets the bus.
  - Sony camcorder ignores presence of a BM (against the spec, this is
    a firmware bug), performs its idea of gap count optimization and
    resets the bus.
  - Preceding two steps are repeated endlessly, bus never settles,
    regular I/O is practically impossible.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.firewire.user/3913

This is an interoperability regression from the old to the new drivers.
Fix it indirectly by adding the 1394a IRM check.  The spec suggests
three and a half methods to determine 1394a compliance of a remote IRM;
we choose the method of testing the Config_ROM.Bus_Info.generation
field.  This is data that firewire-core should have readily available at
this point, i.e. does not require extra I/O.

Reported-by: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de> (missing 1394a check)
Reported-by: H. S. <hs.samix@gmail.com> (issue with Sony DCR-TRV25)
Tested-by: NH. S. <hs.samix@gmail.com>

Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # .32.x and newer
Signed-off-by: NStefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
上级 67a3e12b
......@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ void fw_schedule_bm_work(struct fw_card *card, unsigned long delay)
static void fw_card_bm_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct fw_card *card = container_of(work, struct fw_card, work.work);
struct fw_device *root_device;
struct fw_device *root_device, *irm_device;
struct fw_node *root_node;
unsigned long flags;
int root_id, new_root_id, irm_id, local_id;
......@@ -239,6 +239,7 @@ static void fw_card_bm_work(struct work_struct *work)
bool do_reset = false;
bool root_device_is_running;
bool root_device_is_cmc;
bool irm_is_1394_1995_only;
spin_lock_irqsave(&card->lock, flags);
......@@ -248,12 +249,18 @@ static void fw_card_bm_work(struct work_struct *work)
}
generation = card->generation;
root_node = card->root_node;
fw_node_get(root_node);
root_device = root_node->data;
root_device_is_running = root_device &&
atomic_read(&root_device->state) == FW_DEVICE_RUNNING;
root_device_is_cmc = root_device && root_device->cmc;
irm_device = card->irm_node->data;
irm_is_1394_1995_only = irm_device && irm_device->config_rom &&
(irm_device->config_rom[2] & 0x000000f0) == 0;
root_id = root_node->node_id;
irm_id = card->irm_node->node_id;
local_id = card->local_node->node_id;
......@@ -276,8 +283,15 @@ static void fw_card_bm_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (!card->irm_node->link_on) {
new_root_id = local_id;
fw_notify("IRM has link off, making local node (%02x) root.\n",
new_root_id);
fw_notify("%s, making local node (%02x) root.\n",
"IRM has link off", new_root_id);
goto pick_me;
}
if (irm_is_1394_1995_only) {
new_root_id = local_id;
fw_notify("%s, making local node (%02x) root.\n",
"IRM is not 1394a compliant", new_root_id);
goto pick_me;
}
......@@ -316,8 +330,8 @@ static void fw_card_bm_work(struct work_struct *work)
* root, and thus, IRM.
*/
new_root_id = local_id;
fw_notify("BM lock failed, making local node (%02x) root.\n",
new_root_id);
fw_notify("%s, making local node (%02x) root.\n",
"BM lock failed", new_root_id);
goto pick_me;
}
} else if (card->bm_generation != generation) {
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册