We need to specify a Versatile-specific SMC_IRQ_FLAGS value or the new
generic IRQ layer will complain thusly:

No IRQF_TRIGGER set_type function for IRQ 25 (<NULL>)
Signed-off-by: NDeepak Saxena <dsaxena@plexity.net>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:50:40 +0100
Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 02:42:04PM -0700, akpm@osdl.org wrote:
> > We need to specify a Versatile-specific SMC_IRQ_FLAGS value or the new
> > generic IRQ layer will complain thusly:
>
> I don't think I heard anything back from my previous suggestion that
> the IRQ flags are passed through the platform device IRQ resource.
>
> Doing so would avoid adding yet another platform specific block into
> the file.
>
> BTW, Integrator platforms will also suffer from this, which will add
> another ifdef to this header.
>
> Let's do it right and arrange to pass these flags from the platform
> code.  It's not like they're in a critical path.
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>