- 11 2月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 FdaSilvaYY 提交于
Reviewed-by: NPaul Dale <pauli@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NMatthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14096)
-
- 20 11月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Pauli 提交于
Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: NMatthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13226)
-
- 07 8月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Pauli 提交于
The RAND_DRBG API did not fit well into the new provider concept as implemented by EVP_RAND and EVP_RAND_CTX. The main reason is that the RAND_DRBG API is a mixture of 'front end' and 'back end' API calls and some of its API calls are rather low-level. This holds in particular for the callback mechanism (RAND_DRBG_set_callbacks()) and the RAND_DRBG type changing mechanism (RAND_DRBG_set()). Adding a compatibility layer to continue supporting the RAND_DRBG API as a legacy API for a regular deprecation period turned out to come at the price of complicating the new provider API unnecessarily. Since the RAND_DRBG API exists only since version 1.1.1, it was decided by the OMC to drop it entirely. Other related changes: Use RNG instead of DRBG in EVP_RAND documentation. The documentation was using DRBG in places where it should have been RNG or CSRNG. Move the RAND_DRBG(7) documentation to EVP_RAND(7). Reviewed-by: NMatthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12509)
-
- 24 6月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Pauli 提交于
Reviewed-by: NMatthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11682)
-