Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

No need to continually get the list of supported curves for the client
and server. Just do it once.
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Numerous style issues as well as references to TLS1_3_VERSION instead of
SSL_IS_TLS13(s)
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

The previous commits put in place the logic to exchange key_share data. We
now need to do something with that information. In <= TLSv1.2 the equivalent
of the key_share extension is the ServerKeyExchange and ClientKeyExchange
messages. With key_share those two messages are no longer necessary.

The commit removes the SKE and CKE messages from the TLSv1.3 state machine.
TLSv1.3 is completely different to TLSv1.2 in the messages that it sends
and the transitions that are allowed. Therefore, rather than extend the
existing <=TLS1.2 state transition functions, we create a whole new set for
TLSv1.3. Intially these are still based on the TLSv1.2 ones, but over time
they will be amended.

The new TLSv1.3 transitions remove SKE and CKE completely. There's also some
cleanup for some stuff which is not relevant to TLSv1.3 and is easy to
remove, e.g. the DTLS support (we're not doing DTLSv1.3 yet) and NPN.

I also disable EXTMS for TLSv1.3. Using it was causing some added
complexity, so rather than fix it I removed it, since eventually it will not
be needed anyway.
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

This is a temporary fix for while we are still using the old session
resumption logic in the TLSv1.3 code. Due to differences in EXTMS support
we can't resume a <=TLSv1.2 session in a TLSv1.3 connection (the EXTMS
consistency check causes the connection to abort). This causes test
failures.

Ultimately we will rewrite the session resumption logic for TLSv1.3 so this
problem will go away. But until then we need a quick fix to keep the tests
happy.
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

At the moment the server doesn't yet do anything with this information.
We still need to send the server's key_share info back to the client. That
will happen in subsequent commits.
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

In this commit we just generate the extension on the client side, but don't
yet do anything with it. Subsequent commits, will add the server side
capability.

At the moment we hard code a single key_share. In the future we should make
this configurable.
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Factorise multiple bn_get_top(group->field) calls
Add missing checks on some conditional BN_copy return value
Add missing checks on some BN_copy return value
Add missing checks on a few bn_wexpand return value
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1626)

 to define the certificate filename storage buffer.
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1569)

 using two separated local variables.

buf[1] was unused.
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1569)

Checks that the epoch_time_in_ms field of CT_POLICY_EVAL_CTX is initialized
to approximately the current time (as returned by time()) by default. This
prevents the addition of this field, and its verification during SCT
validation, from breaking existing code that calls SCT_validate directly.
Reviewed-by: NViktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1554)

Reviewed-by: NViktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1554)

Reviewed-by: NViktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1554)

As requested in
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1554#issuecomment-246371575.
Reviewed-by: NViktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1554)

See https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1554#issuecomment-246354677.
Reviewed-by: NViktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1554)

Reviewed-by: NViktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1554)

Do not call the time "current", as a different time can be provided.
For example, a time slightly in the future, to provide tolerance for
CT logs with a clock that is running fast.
Reviewed-by: NViktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1554)

ctlog_new_null() no longer exists.
Reviewed-by: NViktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1554)

Reviewed-by: NViktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1554)

engines/e_padlock.c assumes that for all x86 and x86_64 platforms, the
lower level routines will be present.  However, that's not always
true, for example for solaris-x86-cc, and that leads to build errors.

The better solution is to have configure detect if the lower level
padlock routines are being built, and define the macro PADLOCK_ASM if
they are, and use that macro in our C code.
Reviewed-by: NAndy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1510)

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1514)

Done too soon, this is for future OpenSSL 1.2.0

This reverts commit 6c62f9e1.
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1669)

Simplify PKCS#12 PBE algorithm by working out Ij + B + 1 directly
instead of using BIGNUMs.
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1922)

Under certain circumstances, the libcrypto init code would loop,
causing a deadlock.  This would typically happen if something in
ossl_init_base() caused an OpenSSL error, and the error stack routines
would recurse into the init code before the flag that ossl_init_base()
had been run was checked.

This change makes sure ossl_init_base isn't run once more of the base
is initiated.

Thanks to Dmitry Kostjuchenko for the idea.

Fixes Github issue #1899
Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1922)

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>

Useful e.g. to fully script CA commands
Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1797)

prio openssl 1.1.0 seed_len < q was accepted and the seed argument was
then ignored. Now DSA_generate_parameters_ex() returns an error in such
a case but no error string.
Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Reviewed-by: NMatt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1657)

This reverts commit 349d1cfd.

The proposed fix is incorrect. It marks the "run_once" code as having
finished before it has. The intended semantics of run_once is that no
threads should proceed until the code has run exactly once. With this
change the "second" thread will think the run_once code has already been
run and will continue, even though it is still in progress. This could
result in a crash or other incorrect behaviour.
Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>

Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NTim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1669)

Fixed deadlock in CRYPTO_THREAD_run_once() if call to init() is causing
a recursive call to CRYPTO_THREAD_run_once() again that is causing a hot
deadloop inside do { } while (result == ONCE_ININIT); section.

CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: NRichard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: NRich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1913)