- 18 7月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 17 7月, 2002 7 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
PR: 124
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
can fail, and point at the text in the PROBLEMS file
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
everything works fine. Note: this is only true for 0.9.7 and on
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 16 7月, 2002 10 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
it's really a misfeature according to the jargon file (4.0.0) definition: ":misfeature: /mis-fee'chr/ or /mis'fee`chr/ /n./ A feature that eventually causes lossage, possibly because it is not adequate for a new situation that has evolved. Since it results from a deliberate and properly implemented feature, a misfeature is not a bug."
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
directory, making a separate directory tree with lots of symbolic links seems to be the solution. Unfortunately, Configure doesn't take appropriate steps to support this solution (as in removing a file that's going to be rewritten). This change corrects that situation. Now I just have to find all other places where there's lack of support for this.
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
directory, making a separate directory tree with lots of symbolic links seems to be the solution. Unfortunatelt, Configure doesn't take appropriate steps to support this solution (as in removing a file that's going to be rewritten). This change corrects that situation. Now I just have to find all other places where there's lack of support for this.
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Corrected.
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
we don't need to care about traditional compilers
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
is only used for seeding and doing it in the wrong order will mean seeding is done before the engine randomness is hooked in. Notified by Frederic DONNAT <frederic.donnat@zencod.com>
-
- 15 7月, 2002 2 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
mechanism to the ENGINE framework. This means there there are going to be new functionality for the DSO part, and ultimately some way of merging two file specifications together. This commit places the merging code into the repository. It's currently not used anywhere, and hasn't been tested at all. It may be full of errors, including syntactical ones. Those will be fixed as promptly as possible.
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
(the same keys can be used for ECC schemes other than ECDSA) and add some new options. Similarly, use string "EC PARAMETERS" instead of "ECDSA PARAMETERS" in 'PEM' format. Fix ec_asn1.c (take into account the desired conversion form). 'make update'. Submitted by: Nils Larsch
-
- 12 7月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lutz Jänicke 提交于
defensive phrases...
-
- 11 7月, 2002 5 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
Submitted by Götz Babin-Ebell <babinebell@trustcenter.de>
-
由 Lutz Jänicke 提交于
Submitted by: John.Airey@rnib.org.uk Reviewed by: PR: 128
-
由 Lutz Jänicke 提交于
Submitted by: Richard.Koenning@fujitsu-siemens.com Reviewed by: PR: 129
-
由 Lutz Jänicke 提交于
Submitted by: Garrett Anderson garrett@dirsec.com Reviewed by: PR: 120
-
由 Lutz Jänicke 提交于
Submitted by: jufi@nerdnet.de Reviewed by: PR: 138
-
- 10 7月, 2002 3 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
由 Lutz Jänicke 提交于
des_old.h redefines crypt: #define crypt(b,s)\ DES_crypt((b),(s)) This scheme leads to failure, if header files with the OS's true definition of crypt() are processed _after_ des_old.h was processed. This is e.g. the case on HP-UX with unistd.h. As evp.h now again includes des.h (which includes des_old.h), this problem only came up after this modification. Solution: move header files (indirectly) including e_os.h before the header files (indirectly) including evp.h. Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR:
-
由 Lutz Jänicke 提交于
not covered by the strength bit mask. Submitted by: Reviewed by: PR: 130
-
- 09 7月, 2002 2 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
Submitted by: Nils Larsch
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
(but noone uses it anyway) fix t1_enc.c: use OPENSSL_NO_RC4, not NO_RC4
-
- 08 7月, 2002 2 次提交
-
-
由 Geoff Thorpe 提交于
-
由 Geoff Thorpe 提交于
Submitted by: Jan Tschirschwitz <Jan.Tschirschwitz@cluster-labs.de>
-
- 04 7月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bodo Möller 提交于
-
- 01 7月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lutz Jänicke 提交于
(noted by Jonathan Louie <jlouie@recourse.com>).
-
- 30 6月, 2002 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
-
- 28 6月, 2002 4 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
PR 123
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
PR 71
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
This completes PR 123
-
由 Richard Levitte 提交于
handled properly. Part of PR 75
-