提交 3e7cb13d 编写于 作者: M Matt Caswell

Test that a client protocol "hole" doesn't get detected as a downgrade

Reviewed-by: NViktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7013)
上级 b5b993b2
......@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ use constant {
$proxy->filter(\&downgrade_filter);
my $testtype = DOWNGRADE_TO_TLS_1_2;
$proxy->start() or plan skip_all => "Unable to start up Proxy for tests";
plan tests => 4;
plan tests => 5;
ok(TLSProxy::Message->fail(), "Downgrade TLSv1.3 to TLSv1.2");
#Test 2: Downgrade from TLSv1.3 to TLSv1.1
......@@ -73,6 +73,16 @@ ok(TLSProxy::Message->fail()
&& $alert->description() == TLSProxy::Message::AL_DESC_ILLEGAL_PARAMETER,
"Fallback from TLSv1.3");
SKIP: {
skip "TLSv1.1 disabled", 1 if disabled("tls1_1");
#Test 5: A protocol "hole" should not be detected as a downgrade
$proxy->clear();
$proxy->filter(undef);
$proxy->clientflags("-no_tls1_2");
$proxy->start();
ok(TLSProxy::Message->success(), "TLSv1.2 protocol hole");
}
sub downgrade_filter
{
my $proxy = shift;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册