1. 29 9月, 2021 2 次提交
  2. 28 9月, 2021 1 次提交
  3. 25 9月, 2021 1 次提交
    • wu-sheng's avatar
      Begin 8.9.0 iteration (#7801) · 8b681053
      wu-sheng 提交于
      * [maven-release-plugin] prepare release v8.8.0
      
      * [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration
      
      * Create changes-8.8.0.md
      
      * Reset changelog for 8.9.0
      8b681053
  4. 23 9月, 2021 1 次提交
  5. 17 9月, 2021 2 次提交
  6. 15 9月, 2021 2 次提交
  7. 12 9月, 2021 1 次提交
  8. 11 9月, 2021 1 次提交
  9. 08 9月, 2021 1 次提交
  10. 06 9月, 2021 1 次提交
  11. 05 9月, 2021 1 次提交
  12. 26 8月, 2021 1 次提交
  13. 13 8月, 2021 1 次提交
  14. 12 8月, 2021 1 次提交
  15. 11 8月, 2021 1 次提交
  16. 10 8月, 2021 1 次提交
  17. 30 7月, 2021 1 次提交
    • wu-sheng's avatar
      Begin 8.8.0 iteration (#7395) · 1c5e22a7
      wu-sheng 提交于
      * [maven-release-plugin] prepare release v8.7.0
      
      * [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration
      1c5e22a7
  18. 27 7月, 2021 2 次提交
  19. 22 7月, 2021 1 次提交
  20. 20 7月, 2021 1 次提交
    • wu-sheng's avatar
      Enhance persistent session timeout mechanism. (#7334) · 3a4ee08e
      wu-sheng 提交于
      Fix bug, the enhanced session could cache the metadata metrics(hot entity) forever. A new timeout mechanism is designed for avoiding this specific case.
      
      Optimize this timeout mechanism, make it different for ES(one index per day) and non-ES storage implementation.
      3a4ee08e
  21. 16 7月, 2021 1 次提交
    • wu-sheng's avatar
      Adjust ElasticSearch index refresh period as INT(flushInterval * 2/3) (#7310) · 8df362b9
      wu-sheng 提交于
      Adjust index refresh period as INT(flushInterval * 2/3), it used to be as same as bulk flush period. At the edge case, in low traffic(traffic < bulkActions in the whole period), there is a possible case, 2 period bulks are included in one index refresh rebuild operation, which could cause version conflicts. And this case can't be fixed through core/persistentPeriod as the bulk fresh is not controlled by the persistent timer anymore.
      
      This PR should avoid the following exception in the low load case, especially when bulkActions is set larger than the number of a metric type.
      8df362b9
  22. 15 7月, 2021 2 次提交
  23. 14 7月, 2021 1 次提交
    • wu-sheng's avatar
      Remove synchronous persistence mechanism in API level and ElasticSearch implementation (#7293) · de975c7e
      wu-sheng 提交于
      * Performance: remove the synchronous persistence mechanism from batch ElasticSearch DAO. Because the current enhanced persistent session mechanism, don't require the data queryable immediately after the insert and update anymore.
      * Performance: share `flushInterval` setting for both metrics and record data, due to `synchronous persistence mechanism` removed. Record flush interval used to be hardcoded as 10s.
      * Remove `syncBulkActions` in ElasticSearch storage option.
      * Increase the default bulkActions(env, SW_STORAGE_ES_BULK_ACTIONS) to 5000(from 1000).
      * Increase the flush interval of ElasticSearch indices to 15s(from 10s)
      
      Add these 2 references. According to these, **(same _index, _type and _id) in same bulk will be in order**
      1. https://github.com/elastic/elasticsearch/issues/50199
      2. https://discuss.elastic.co/t/order-of--bulk-request-operations/98124
      
      Notice, the order of different bulks is not guaranteed by the ElasticSearch cluster. We are going to have the risk of dirty write. But consider we set over 20s period between flush, and index flush period is 10, we should be safe.
      
      Recommend 5000 bulk size and 15s flush interval only. The persistent period has been set to 25s.
      de975c7e
  24. 09 7月, 2021 1 次提交
  25. 03 7月, 2021 1 次提交
  26. 01 7月, 2021 1 次提交
  27. 19 6月, 2021 1 次提交
  28. 17 6月, 2021 1 次提交
  29. 08 6月, 2021 1 次提交
  30. 19 5月, 2021 1 次提交
  31. 07 5月, 2021 1 次提交
  32. 25 4月, 2021 1 次提交
  33. 19 4月, 2021 1 次提交
  34. 09 4月, 2021 1 次提交
  35. 08 4月, 2021 1 次提交