- 20 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladislav Grishenko 提交于
-
- 12 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Kozlov 提交于
-
- 07 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Kozlov 提交于
-
- 03 4月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Kozlov 提交于
-
由 Dmitry Kozlov 提交于
-
- 24 3月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Guillaume Nault 提交于
If the peer re-authenticates (because of option conf_interval) and pwdb calls auth_result(), we may add the interval timer again to the session context. This crashes accel-ppp when deleting the session, because the interval timer is removed only once and the superfluous timers are still running. Therefore, when removing the context, triton detects this issue and calls abort(). To fix this, we need to detect if the session is already started and just send a CHAP Success message in this case. Signed-off-by: NGuillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
-
由 Guillaume Nault 提交于
When pwdb returns PWDB_NO_IMPL and chap_recv_response() performs the authentication itself, it delegates this task to chap_check_response(). This function sends a CHAP Failure message if it can't retrieve the password, but not in case of password mismatch. Since chap_recv_response() already sends a CHAP Failure message on error, the one sent by chap_check_response() is useless. Signed-off-by: NGuillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
-
由 Guillaume Nault 提交于
When pwdb returns PWDB_NO_IMPL, then chap_recv_response() tries to authenticate the peer itself. If this authentication succeeds but the session is already started (in case of re-authentication, with option conf_interval), no CHAP Success is sent. This patch sends the missing CHAP Success message in this case, so that the peer knows that its response has been received and accepted, and that no retransmission is required. Signed-off-by: NGuillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
-
- 20 3月, 2018 5 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Kozlov 提交于
-
-
由 xebd 提交于
Compiling fix for 4.15+ kernels
-
由 Denys Fedoryshchenko 提交于
-
由 Dmitry Kozlov 提交于
-
- 15 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Kozlov 提交于
-
- 06 3月, 2018 5 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Kozlov 提交于
-
由 xebd 提交于
sstp: ipv6/unix sock & proxy protocol support
-
由 Dmitry Kozlov 提交于
-
由 Dmitry Kozlov 提交于
-
由 Dmitry Kozlov 提交于
-
- 04 3月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 xebd 提交于
cppcheck fixes
-
由 Vladislav Grishenko 提交于
-
由 Vladislav Grishenko 提交于
-
- 03 3月, 2018 4 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Kozlov 提交于
-
由 xebd 提交于
triton: more general fix of thread wake up crash
-
由 Guillaume Nault 提交于
The 'username' variable can be freed at the beginning of the function. We have to use ppp->ses.username instead. Signed-off-by: NGuillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
-
由 Dmitry Kozlov 提交于
-
- 02 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladislav Grishenko 提交于
after commit 287adbfc gcc still may reorder alloca() and memset() calls. fix that with volatile access & memory barrier.
-
- 01 3月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Vladislav Grishenko 提交于
no need to wait until timeout for non-http data (i.e https)
-
由 Vladislav Grishenko 提交于
-
由 Vladislav Grishenko 提交于
-
- 28 2月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladislav Grishenko 提交于
almost the same as ipv4/ipv6 is accessible by anyone for easier access under multiple proxy effective users.
-
- 27 2月, 2018 5 次提交
-
-
由 Vladislav Grishenko 提交于
-
由 Vladislav Grishenko 提交于
-
由 Vladislav Grishenko 提交于
-
由 Vladislav Grishenko 提交于
following bind option formats are valid: bind=x.x.x.x bind=2001:db8::1 bind=unix:/var/run/sstp.socket bind=unix:@sstp port option is meaningful for ipv4 and ipv6 only
-
由 Vladislav Grishenko 提交于
currently the only ssl value is supported
-
- 26 2月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Kozlov 提交于
-
- 22 2月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Guillaume Nault 提交于
Let an optional route priority (aka metric) be defined in RADIUS Framed-Route attributes. The priority is an integer placed at the end of the route string. This is backward compatible with the previous format and also conforms with the recommended format defined by RFC 2865 (although we don't allow multiple metrics). Framed-Route format is: <network> [<gateway> [<priority>]] For example, 'Framed-Route = "192.0.2.0/24 203.0.113.1 8"' will let the following route be installed (assuming 203.0.113.1 is routed through eth0): $ ip route show [...] 192.0.2.0/24 via 203.0.113.1 dev eth0 metric 8 It's possible to use the unspecified gateway (0.0.0.0) if one wants to set a priority without specifying a gateway address. Finally, route deletion now also takes the priority into account, in order to avoid removing a different route accidentally. Signed-off-by: NGuillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
-
- 20 2月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 xebd 提交于
accel-cmd: add -P/--password support
-
由 Vladislav Grishenko 提交于
-