-
由 Imre Deak 提交于
For consistency s/intel_get_shared_dpll()/intel_reserve_shared_dplls()/ to better match intel_release_shared_dplls(). Also, pass to the reserve/release and get_dplls/put_dplls hooks the intel_atomic_state and CRTC object, that way these functions can look up the old or new state as needed. Also release the PLLs from the atomic state via a new put_dplls->intel_unreference_shared_dpll() call chain for better symmetry with the reservation via the get_dplls->intel_reference_shared_dpll() call chain. Since nothing uses the PLL returned by intel_reserve_shared_dplls(), make it return only a bool. While at it also clarify the reserve/release function docbook headers making it clear that multiple DPLLs will be reserved/released and whether the new or old atomic CRTC state is affected. This refactoring is also a preparation for a follow-up change that needs to reserve multiple DPLLs. Kudos to Ville for the idea to pass intel_atomic_state around, to make things clearer locally where an object's old/new atomic state is required. No functional changes. v2: - Fix checkpatch issue: typo in code comment. v3: - Rebase on drm-tip. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190628143635.22066-17-imre.deak@intel.com
866955fa