Skip to content

R
riscv-linux

OpenXiangShan / riscv-linux
11 个月 前同步成功

通知 6
Star 2
Fork 2
R
riscv-linux

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 19 5月, 2012 1 次提交
    • L
      proc: move fd symlink i_mode calculations into tid_fd_revalidate() · 30a08bf2
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      Instead of doing the i_mode calculations at proc_fd_instantiate() time,
move them into tid_fd_revalidate(), which is where the other inode state
(notably uid/gid information) is updated too.

Otherwise we'll end up with stale i_mode information if an fd is re-used
while the dentry still hangs around.  Not that anything really *cares*
(symlink permissions don't really matter), but Tetsuo Handa noticed that
the owner read/write bits don't always match the state of the
readability of the file descriptor, and we _used_ to get this right a
long time ago in a galaxy far, far away.

Besides, aside from fixing an ugly detail (that has apparently been this
way since commit 61a28784: "proc: Remove the hard coded inode
numbers" in 2006), this removes more lines of code than it adds.  And it
just makes sense to update i_mode in the same place we update i_uid/gid.

Al Viro correctly points out that we could just do the inode fill in the
inode iops ->getattr() function instead.  However, that does require
somewhat slightly more invasive changes, and adds yet *another* lookup
of the file descriptor.  We need to do the revalidate() for other
reasons anyway, and have the file descriptor handy, so we might as well
fill in the information at this point.
Reported-by: NTetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: NEric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      30a08bf2
  3. 18 5月, 2012 1 次提交
    • C
      fs, proc: fix ABBA deadlock in case of execution attempt of map_files/ entries · eb94cd96
      由 Cyrill Gorcunov 提交于 
      map_files/ entries are never supposed to be executed, still curious
minds might try to run them, which leads to the following deadlock

  ======================================================
  [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
  3.4.0-rc4-24406-g841e6a6 #121 Not tainted
  -------------------------------------------------------
  bash/1556 is trying to acquire lock:
   (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){+.+.+.}, at: do_lookup+0x267/0x2b1

  but task is already holding lock:
   (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: prepare_bprm_creds+0x2d/0x69

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #1 (&sig->cred_guard_mutex){+.+.+.}:
         validate_chain+0x444/0x4f4
         __lock_acquire+0x387/0x3f8
         lock_acquire+0x12b/0x158
         __mutex_lock_common+0x56/0x3a9
         mutex_lock_killable_nested+0x40/0x45
         lock_trace+0x24/0x59
         proc_map_files_lookup+0x5a/0x165
         __lookup_hash+0x52/0x73
         do_lookup+0x276/0x2b1
         walk_component+0x3d/0x114
         do_last+0xfc/0x540
         path_openat+0xd3/0x306
         do_filp_open+0x3d/0x89
         do_sys_open+0x74/0x106
         sys_open+0x21/0x23
         tracesys+0xdd/0xe2

  -> #0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){+.+.+.}:
         check_prev_add+0x6a/0x1ef
         validate_chain+0x444/0x4f4
         __lock_acquire+0x387/0x3f8
         lock_acquire+0x12b/0x158
         __mutex_lock_common+0x56/0x3a9
         mutex_lock_nested+0x40/0x45
         do_lookup+0x267/0x2b1
         walk_component+0x3d/0x114
         link_path_walk+0x1f9/0x48f
         path_openat+0xb6/0x306
         do_filp_open+0x3d/0x89
         open_exec+0x25/0xa0
         do_execve_common+0xea/0x2f9
         do_execve+0x43/0x45
         sys_execve+0x43/0x5a
         stub_execve+0x6c/0xc0

This is because prepare_bprm_creds grabs task->signal->cred_guard_mutex
and when do_lookup happens we try to grab task->signal->cred_guard_mutex
again in lock_trace.

Fix it using plain ptrace_may_access() helper in proc_map_files_lookup()
and in proc_map_files_readdir() instead of lock_trace(), the caller must
be CAP_SYS_ADMIN granted anyway.
Signed-off-by: NCyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Reported-by: NSasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      eb94cd96
  5. 17 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  7. 11 5月, 2012 3 次提交
    • B
      bio allocation failure due to bio_get_nr_vecs() · f908ee94
      由 Bernd Schubert 提交于 
      The number of bio_get_nr_vecs() is passed down via bio_alloc() to
bvec_alloc_bs(), which fails the bio allocation if
nr_iovecs > BIO_MAX_PAGES. For the underlying caller this causes an
unexpected bio allocation failure.
Limiting to queue_max_segments() is not sufficient, as max_segments
also might be very large.

bvec_alloc_bs(gfp_mask, nr_iovecs, ) => NULL when nr_iovecs  > BIO_MAX_PAGES
bio_alloc_bioset(gfp_mask, nr_iovecs, ...)
bio_alloc(GFP_NOIO, nvecs)
xfs_alloc_ioend_bio()
Signed-off-by: NBernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@itwm.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      f908ee94
    • J
      block: don't mark buffers beyond end of disk as mapped · 080399aa
      由 Jeff Moyer 提交于 
      Hi,

We have a bug report open where a squashfs image mounted on ppc64 would
exhibit errors due to trying to read beyond the end of the disk.  It can
easily be reproduced by doing the following:

[root@ibm-p750e-02-lp3 ~]# ls -l install.img
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 142032896 Apr 30 16:46 install.img
[root@ibm-p750e-02-lp3 ~]# mount -o loop ./install.img /mnt/test
[root@ibm-p750e-02-lp3 ~]# dd if=/dev/loop0 of=/dev/null
dd: reading `/dev/loop0': Input/output error
277376+0 records in
277376+0 records out
142016512 bytes (142 MB) copied, 0.9465 s, 150 MB/s

In dmesg, you'll find the following:

squashfs: version 4.0 (2009/01/31) Phillip Lougher
[   43.106012] attempt to access beyond end of device
[   43.106029] loop0: rw=0, want=277410, limit=277408
[   43.106039] Buffer I/O error on device loop0, logical block 138704
[   43.106053] attempt to access beyond end of device
[   43.106057] loop0: rw=0, want=277412, limit=277408
[   43.106061] Buffer I/O error on device loop0, logical block 138705
[   43.106066] attempt to access beyond end of device
[   43.106070] loop0: rw=0, want=277414, limit=277408
[   43.106073] Buffer I/O error on device loop0, logical block 138706
[   43.106078] attempt to access beyond end of device
[   43.106081] loop0: rw=0, want=277416, limit=277408
[   43.106085] Buffer I/O error on device loop0, logical block 138707
[   43.106089] attempt to access beyond end of device
[   43.106093] loop0: rw=0, want=277418, limit=277408
[   43.106096] Buffer I/O error on device loop0, logical block 138708
[   43.106101] attempt to access beyond end of device
[   43.106104] loop0: rw=0, want=277420, limit=277408
[   43.106108] Buffer I/O error on device loop0, logical block 138709
[   43.106112] attempt to access beyond end of device
[   43.106116] loop0: rw=0, want=277422, limit=277408
[   43.106120] Buffer I/O error on device loop0, logical block 138710
[   43.106124] attempt to access beyond end of device
[   43.106128] loop0: rw=0, want=277424, limit=277408
[   43.106131] Buffer I/O error on device loop0, logical block 138711
[   43.106135] attempt to access beyond end of device
[   43.106139] loop0: rw=0, want=277426, limit=277408
[   43.106143] Buffer I/O error on device loop0, logical block 138712
[   43.106147] attempt to access beyond end of device
[   43.106151] loop0: rw=0, want=277428, limit=277408
[   43.106154] Buffer I/O error on device loop0, logical block 138713
[   43.106158] attempt to access beyond end of device
[   43.106162] loop0: rw=0, want=277430, limit=277408
[   43.106166] attempt to access beyond end of device
[   43.106169] loop0: rw=0, want=277432, limit=277408
...
[   43.106307] attempt to access beyond end of device
[   43.106311] loop0: rw=0, want=277470, limit=2774

Squashfs manages to read in the end block(s) of the disk during the
mount operation.  Then, when dd reads the block device, it leads to
block_read_full_page being called with buffers that are beyond end of
disk, but are marked as mapped.  Thus, it would end up submitting read
I/O against them, resulting in the errors mentioned above.  I fixed the
problem by modifying init_page_buffers to only set the buffer mapped if
it fell inside of i_size.

Cheers,
Jeff
Signed-off-by: NJeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>

--

Changes from v1->v2: re-used max_block, as suggested by Nick Piggin.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      080399aa
    • K
      proc/pid/pagemap: correctly report non-present ptes and holes between vmas · 16fbdce6
      由 Konstantin Khlebnikov 提交于 
      Reset the current pagemap-entry if the current pte isn't present, or if
current vma is over.  Otherwise pagemap reports last entry again and
again.

Non-present pte reporting was broken in commit 092b50ba ("pagemap:
introduce data structure for pagemap entry")

Reporting for holes was broken in commit 5aaabe83 ("pagemap: avoid
splitting thp when reading /proc/pid/pagemap")
Signed-off-by: NKonstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
Reported-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      16fbdce6
  9. 10 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  11. 08 5月, 2012 1 次提交
    • J
      jffs2: Fix lock acquisition order bug in gc path · 226bb7df
      由 Josh Cartwright 提交于 
      The locking policy is such that the erase_complete_block spinlock is
nested within the alloc_sem mutex.  This fixes a case in which the
acquisition order was erroneously reversed.  This issue was caught by
the following lockdep splat:

   =======================================================
   [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
   3.0.5 #1
   -------------------------------------------------------
   jffs2_gcd_mtd6/299 is trying to acquire lock:
    (&c->alloc_sem){+.+.+.}, at: [<c01f7714>] jffs2_garbage_collect_pass+0x314/0x890

   but task is already holding lock:
    (&(&c->erase_completion_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<c01f7708>] jffs2_garbage_collect_pass+0x308/0x890

   which lock already depends on the new lock.

   the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

   -> #1 (&(&c->erase_completion_lock)->rlock){+.+...}:
          [<c008bec4>] validate_chain+0xe6c/0x10bc
          [<c008c660>] __lock_acquire+0x54c/0xba4
          [<c008d240>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x114
          [<c046780c>] _raw_spin_lock+0x3c/0x4c
          [<c01f744c>] jffs2_garbage_collect_pass+0x4c/0x890
          [<c01f937c>] jffs2_garbage_collect_thread+0x1b4/0x1cc
          [<c0071a68>] kthread+0x98/0xa0
          [<c000f264>] kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8

   -> #0 (&c->alloc_sem){+.+.+.}:
          [<c008ad2c>] print_circular_bug+0x70/0x2c4
          [<c008c08c>] validate_chain+0x1034/0x10bc
          [<c008c660>] __lock_acquire+0x54c/0xba4
          [<c008d240>] lock_acquire+0xa4/0x114
          [<c0466628>] mutex_lock_nested+0x74/0x33c
          [<c01f7714>] jffs2_garbage_collect_pass+0x314/0x890
          [<c01f937c>] jffs2_garbage_collect_thread+0x1b4/0x1cc
          [<c0071a68>] kthread+0x98/0xa0
          [<c000f264>] kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8

   other info that might help us debug this:

    Possible unsafe locking scenario:

          CPU0                    CPU1
          ----                    ----
     lock(&(&c->erase_completion_lock)->rlock);
                                  lock(&c->alloc_sem);
                                  lock(&(&c->erase_completion_lock)->rlock);
     lock(&c->alloc_sem);

    *** DEADLOCK ***

   1 lock held by jffs2_gcd_mtd6/299:
    #0:  (&(&c->erase_completion_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<c01f7708>] jffs2_garbage_collect_pass+0x308/0x890

   stack backtrace:
   [<c00155dc>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0x100) from [<c0463dc0>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24)
   [<c0463dc0>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24) from [<c008ae84>] (print_circular_bug+0x1c8/0x2c4)
   [<c008ae84>] (print_circular_bug+0x1c8/0x2c4) from [<c008c08c>] (validate_chain+0x1034/0x10bc)
   [<c008c08c>] (validate_chain+0x1034/0x10bc) from [<c008c660>] (__lock_acquire+0x54c/0xba4)
   [<c008c660>] (__lock_acquire+0x54c/0xba4) from [<c008d240>] (lock_acquire+0xa4/0x114)
   [<c008d240>] (lock_acquire+0xa4/0x114) from [<c0466628>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x74/0x33c)
   [<c0466628>] (mutex_lock_nested+0x74/0x33c) from [<c01f7714>] (jffs2_garbage_collect_pass+0x314/0x890)
   [<c01f7714>] (jffs2_garbage_collect_pass+0x314/0x890) from [<c01f937c>] (jffs2_garbage_collect_thread+0x1b4/0x1cc)
   [<c01f937c>] (jffs2_garbage_collect_thread+0x1b4/0x1cc) from [<c0071a68>] (kthread+0x98/0xa0)
   [<c0071a68>] (kthread+0x98/0xa0) from [<c000f264>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)

This was introduce in '81cfc9f1 jffs2: Fix serious write stall due to erase'.

Cc: stable@kernel.org [2.6.37+]
Signed-off-by: NJosh Cartwright <joshc@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
      226bb7df
  13. 06 5月, 2012 1 次提交
    • C
      Btrfs: avoid sleeping in verify_parent_transid while atomic · b9fab919
      由 Chris Mason 提交于 
      verify_parent_transid needs to lock the extent range to make
sure no IO is underway, and so it can safely clear the
uptodate bits if our checks fail.

But, a few callers are using it with spinlocks held.  Most
of the time, the generation numbers are going to match, and
we don't want to switch to a blocking lock just for the error
case.  This adds an atomic flag to verify_parent_transid,
and changes it to return EAGAIN if it needs to block to
properly verifiy things.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      b9fab919
  15. 05 5月, 2012 5 次提交
  17. 04 5月, 2012 5 次提交
  19. 02 5月, 2012 3 次提交
  21. 01 5月, 2012 2 次提交
  23. 30 4月, 2012 2 次提交
    • L
      autofs: make the autofsv5 packet file descriptor use a packetized pipe · 64f371bc
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      The autofs packet size has had a very unfortunate size problem on x86:
because the alignment of 'u64' differs in 32-bit and 64-bit modes, and
because the packet data was not 8-byte aligned, the size of the autofsv5
packet structure differed between 32-bit and 64-bit modes despite
looking otherwise identical (300 vs 304 bytes respectively).

We first fixed that up by making the 64-bit compat mode know about this
problem in commit a32744d4 ("autofs: work around unhappy compat
problem on x86-64"), and that made a 32-bit 'systemd' work happily on a
64-bit kernel because everything then worked the same way as on a 32-bit
kernel.

But it turned out that 'automount' had actually known and worked around
this problem in user space, so fixing the kernel to do the proper 32-bit
compatibility handling actually *broke* 32-bit automount on a 64-bit
kernel, because it knew that the packet sizes were wrong and expected
those incorrect sizes.

As a result, we ended up reverting that compatibility mode fix, and
thus breaking systemd again, in commit fcbf94b9.

With both automount and systemd doing a single read() system call, and
verifying that they get *exactly* the size they expect but using
different sizes, it seemed that fixing one of them inevitably seemed to
break the other.  At one point, a patch I seriously considered applying
from Michael Tokarev did a "strcmp()" to see if it was automount that
was doing the operation.  Ugly, ugly.

However, a prettier solution exists now thanks to the packetized pipe
mode.  By marking the communication pipe as being packetized (by simply
setting the O_DIRECT flag), we can always just write the bigger packet
size, and if user-space does a smaller read, it will just get that
partial end result and the extra alignment padding will simply be thrown
away.

This makes both automount and systemd happy, since they now get the size
they asked for, and the kernel side of autofs simply no longer needs to
care - it could pad out the packet arbitrarily.

Of course, if there is some *other* user of autofs (please, please,
please tell me it ain't so - and we haven't heard of any) that tries to
read the packets with multiple writes, that other user will now be
broken - the whole point of the packetized mode is that one system call
gets exactly one packet, and you cannot read a packet in pieces.
Tested-by: NMichael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Cc: Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      64f371bc
    • L
      pipes: add a "packetized pipe" mode for writing · 9883035a
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      The actual internal pipe implementation is already really about
individual packets (called "pipe buffers"), and this simply exposes that
as a special packetized mode.

When we are in the packetized mode (marked by O_DIRECT as suggested by
Alan Cox), a write() on a pipe will not merge the new data with previous
writes, so each write will get a pipe buffer of its own.  The pipe
buffer is then marked with the PIPE_BUF_FLAG_PACKET flag, which in turn
will tell the reader side to break the read at that boundary (and throw
away any partial packet contents that do not fit in the read buffer).

End result: as long as you do writes less than PIPE_BUF in size (so that
the pipe doesn't have to split them up), you can now treat the pipe as a
packet interface, where each read() system call will read one packet at
a time.  You can just use a sufficiently big read buffer (PIPE_BUF is
sufficient, since bigger than that doesn't guarantee atomicity anyway),
and the return value of the read() will naturally give you the size of
the packet.

NOTE! We do not support zero-sized packets, and zero-sized reads and
writes to a pipe continue to be no-ops.  Also note that big packets will
currently be split at write time, but that the size at which that
happens is not really specified (except that it's bigger than PIPE_BUF).
Currently that limit is the system page size, but we might want to
explicitly support bigger packets some day.

The main user for this is going to be the autofs packet interface,
allowing us to stop having to care so deeply about exact packet sizes
(which have had bugs with 32/64-bit compatibility modes).  But user
space can create packetized pipes with "pipe2(fd, O_DIRECT)", which will
fail with an EINVAL on kernels that do not support this interface.
Tested-by: NMichael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Cc: Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Cc: stable@kernel.org  # needed for systemd/autofs interaction fix
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      9883035a
  25. 29 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  27. 28 4月, 2012 13 次提交