- 11 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bruno Kühnen Meneguello 提交于
-
- 04 5月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
- 02 5月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Beck 提交于
-
由 Daniel Beck 提交于
-
由 Daniel Beck 提交于
-
由 Jesse Glick 提交于
-
- 01 5月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jesse Glick 提交于
For robustness, pass on the null to Jelly rather than failing page rendering.
-
由 Jesse Glick 提交于
-
- 30 4月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jesse Glick 提交于
Jenkins.getComputers may be called frequently; do not perform an expensive locale-sensitive sort each time.
-
由 Jesse Glick 提交于
-
由 Jesse Glick 提交于
-
由 Jesse Glick 提交于
-
- 29 4月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jesse Glick 提交于
(Also relevant to JENKINS-22395 diagnostics.)
-
由 Jesse Glick 提交于
-
- 28 4月, 2014 6 次提交
-
-
由 anafke 提交于
Start cron at zero seconds after the minute, and ensure the internal calendar is set to zero seconds. Allows for more predictable behavior.
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
由 Jesse Glick 提交于
-
由 gcummings 提交于
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
- 24 4月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Beck 提交于
Instead, use a distance of 0.5x the width/height of the label. This improves appearance in combination with JENKINS-22688 for different font sizes.
-
由 Daniel Beck 提交于
-
由 Daniel Beck 提交于
-
- 23 4月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
pending was null as soon as task started running, so it was possible that another thread submits the task and have that executed while the first one was still running
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
- 22 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nicolas De Loof 提交于
-
- 21 4月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
由 Fernando Boaglio 提交于
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
- 20 4月, 2014 6 次提交
-
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
This is a much simpler fix
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
- coding style was not matching the rest of Jenkins - IOUtils.closeQuietly is a lot more concise way of achieving the same thing. - AtomicFileWriter.abort() does close, so no need to close it one more time.
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
Bringing this to the parity with ParameterizedJobMixIn.doBuild() Instead of returning JSON, it returns "201 Created" and responds with the location of the queue item, through which the caller can track how it passes through the queue and eventually gets built/cancelled. The approach in pull request #750 that relies on AbstractProject.getQueueItem() is inherently unreliable, because item can be immediately built before the JSON is rendered, or it might corresponds to other queued items if the build supports concurrent builds, etc.
-
由 Kohsuke Kawaguchi 提交于
Massaging the pull request. - Simplifying by reusing InterceptingExecutorService - Not hiding the implementation class for better consistency with other ExecutorService impls in Jenkins.
-