提交 4557398f 编写于 作者: K Kirill Korotaev 提交者: Linus Torvalds

[PATCH] stop_machine() vs. synchronous IPI send deadlock

This fixes deadlock of stop_machine() vs.  synchronous IPI send.  The
problem is that stop_machine() disables interrupts before disabling
preemption on other CPUs.  So if another CPU is preempted and then calls
something like flush_tlb_all() it will deadlock with CPU doing
stop_machine() and which can't process IPI due to disabled IRQs.

I changed stop_machine() to do the same things exactly as it does on other
CPUs, i.e.  it should disable preemption first on _all_ CPUs including
itself and only after that disable IRQs.
Signed-off-by: NKirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: "Andrey Savochkin" <saw@sawoct.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
上级 c5b60979
......@@ -119,13 +119,12 @@ static int stop_machine(void)
return ret;
}
/* Don't schedule us away at this point, please. */
local_irq_disable();
/* Now they are all started, make them hold the CPUs, ready. */
preempt_disable();
stopmachine_set_state(STOPMACHINE_PREPARE);
/* Make them disable irqs. */
local_irq_disable();
stopmachine_set_state(STOPMACHINE_DISABLE_IRQ);
return 0;
......@@ -135,6 +134,7 @@ static void restart_machine(void)
{
stopmachine_set_state(STOPMACHINE_EXIT);
local_irq_enable();
preempt_enable_no_resched();
}
struct stop_machine_data
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册