# Design Doc: Operation Graph Based Parameter Server ## Abstract We propose an approach to implment the parameter server. In this approach, there is no fundimental difference between the trainer and the parameter server: they both run sub-graphs, but sub-graphs of different purposes. ## Background The previous implementations of the parameter server does not run a sub-graph. parameter initialization, optimizer computation, network communication and checkpointing are implemented twice on both the trainer and the parameter server. It would be great if we can write code once and use them on both the trainer and the parameter server: reduces code duplication and improves extensibility. Given during the current refactor, we are representing everything as a computing graph on the trainer. Representing everything as a computing graph on the parameter server becomes a natural extension. ## Design ### Graph Converter The *graph converter* converts user-defined operation (OP) graph into sub-graphs to be scheduled on different nodes. 1. The user-defined OP graph will be cut into sub-graphs of different purposes (e.g., trainer, parameter server) to run on different workers. 1. OPs will be added to the subgraphs, so the subgraphs can communicate with each other. We will need these OPs: *send*, *recv*, *gradient accumulator*, *string accumulator*, *loop forever*. Below is an example of converting the user defined graph to the sub-graphs for the trainer and the parameter server: After converting: 1. The parameter variable W and it's optimizer subgraph are placed on the parameter server. 1. Operators are added to the sub-graphs. - *send* operator sends data and sender's address to the destination. - *recv* operator receives data and sender's address from the destination. It will block until data has been received. - *gradient accumulator* operator accumulates *N* pieces of gradients. N=1 in Async-SGD, N>1 in Sync-SGD. - *string accumulator* accumulates *N* pieces of strings into a list of strings. N=1 in Async-SGD, N>1 in Sync-SGD. - *loop forever* runs itself as a target forever. ### Benefits - Model parallelism become easier to implement: it's an extension to the trainer - parameter server approach. we already have the communication OPs, but need to extend the graph converter. - User-defined optimizer is easier to add - user can now express it as a subgraph. - No more duplication logic inside the trainer and the parameter server in the background section. ### Challenges - It might be hard for the graph converter to cut a general graph (without any hint for which sub-graph is the optimizer). We may need to label which sub-graph inside the OP graph is the optimizer. - It's important to balance the parameter shards of on multiple parameter server. If a single parameter is very big (some word-embedding, fully connected, softmax layer), we need to automatically partition the single parameter onto different parameter servers when possible (only element-wise optimizer depends on the parameter variable).