This tutorial introduces techniques we use to profile and tune the CPU performance of PaddlePaddle. We will use Python packages `cProfile` and `yep`, and Google's `perftools`. Profiling is the process that reveals performance bottlenecks, which could be very different from what's in the developers' mind. Performance tuning is done to fix these bottlenecks. Performance optimization repeats the steps of profiling and tuning alternatively. PaddlePaddle users program AI applications by calling the Python API, which calls into `libpaddle.so.` written in C++. In this tutorial, we focus on the profiling and tuning of 1. the Python code and 1. the mixture of Python and C++ code. ## Profiling the Python Code ### Generate the Performance Profiling File We can use Python standard package, [`cProfile`](https://docs.python.org/2/library/profile.html), to generate Python profiling file. For example: ```bash python -m cProfile -o profile.out main.py ``` where `main.py` is the program we are going to profile, `-o` specifies the output file. Without `-o`, `cProfile` would outputs to standard output. ### Look into the Profiling File `cProfile` generates `profile.out` after `main.py` completes. We can use [`cprofilev`](https://github.com/ymichael/cprofilev) to look into the details: ```bash cprofilev -a 0.0.0.0 -p 3214 -f profile.out main.py ``` where `-a` specifies the HTTP IP, `-p` specifies the port, `-f` specifies the profiling file, and `main.py` is the source file. Open the Web browser and points to the local IP and the specifies port, we will see the output like the following: ``` ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function) 1 0.284 0.284 29.514 29.514 main.py:1() 4696 0.128 0.000 15.748 0.003 /home/yuyang/perf_test/.env/lib/python2.7/site-packages/paddle/fluid/executor.py:20(run) 4696 12.040 0.003 12.040 0.003 {built-in method run} 1 0.144 0.144 6.534 6.534 /home/yuyang/perf_test/.env/lib/python2.7/site-packages/paddle/v2/__init__.py:14() ``` where each line corresponds to Python function, and the meaning of each column is as follows: | column | meaning | | --- | --- | | ncalls | the number of calls into a function | | tottime | the total execution time of the function, not including the execution time of other functions called by the function | | percall | tottime divided by ncalls | | cumtime | the total execution time of the function, including the execution time of other functions being called | | percall | cumtime divided by ncalls | | filename:lineno(function) | where the function is defined | ### Identify Performance Bottlenecks Usually, `tottime` and the related `percall` time is what we want to focus on. We can sort above profiling file by tottime: ```text 4696 12.040 0.003 12.040 0.003 {built-in method run} 300005 0.874 0.000 1.681 0.000 /home/yuyang/perf_test/.env/lib/python2.7/site-packages/paddle/v2/dataset/mnist.py:38(reader) 107991 0.676 0.000 1.519 0.000 /home/yuyang/perf_test/.env/lib/python2.7/site-packages/paddle/fluid/framework.py:219(__init__) 4697 0.626 0.000 2.291 0.000 /home/yuyang/perf_test/.env/lib/python2.7/site-packages/paddle/fluid/framework.py:428(sync_with_cpp) 1 0.618 0.618 0.618 0.618 /home/yuyang/perf_test/.env/lib/python2.7/site-packages/paddle/fluid/__init__.py:1() ``` We can see that the most time-consuming function is the `built-in method run`, which is a C++ function in `libpaddle.so`. We will explain how to profile C++ code in the next section. At this moment, let's look into the third function `sync_with_cpp`, which is a Python function. We can click it to understand more about it: ``` Called By: Ordered by: internal time List reduced from 4497 to 2 due to restriction <'sync_with_cpp'> Function was called by... ncalls tottime cumtime /home/yuyang/perf_test/.env/lib/python2.7/site-packages/paddle/fluid/framework.py:428(sync_with_cpp) <- 4697 0.626 2.291 /home/yuyang/perf_test/.env/lib/python2.7/site-packages/paddle/fluid/framework.py:562(sync_with_cpp) /home/yuyang/perf_test/.env/lib/python2.7/site-packages/paddle/fluid/framework.py:562(sync_with_cpp) <- 4696 0.019 2.316 /home/yuyang/perf_test/.env/lib/python2.7/site-packages/paddle/fluid/framework.py:487(clone) 1 0.000 0.001 /home/yuyang/perf_test/.env/lib/python2.7/site-packages/paddle/fluid/framework.py:534(append_backward) Called: Ordered by: internal time List reduced from 4497 to 2 due to restriction <'sync_with_cpp'> ``` The lists of the callers of `sync_with_cpp` might help us understand how to improve the function definition. ## Profiling Python and C++ Code ### Generate the Profiling File To profile a mixture of Python and C++ code, we can use a Python package, `yep`, that can work with Google's `perftools`, which is a commonly-used profiler for C/C++ code. In Ubuntu systems, we can install `yep` and `perftools` by running the following commands: ```bash apt update apt install libgoogle-perftools-dev pip install yep ``` Then we can run the following command ```bash python -m yep -v main.py ``` to generate the profiling file. The default filename is `main.py.prof`. Please be aware of the `-v` command line option, which prints the analysis results after generating the profiling file. By examining the the print result, we'd know that if we stripped debug information from `libpaddle.so` at build time. The following hints help make sure that the analysis results are readable: 1. Use GCC command line option `-g` when building `libpaddle.so` so to include the debug information. The standard building system of PaddlePaddle is CMake, so you might want to set `CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo`. 1. Use GCC command line option `-O2` or `-O3` to generate optimized binary code. It doesn't make sense to profile `libpaddle.so` without optimization, because it would anyway run slowly. 1. Profiling the single-threaded binary file before the multi-threading version, because the latter often generates tangled profiling analysis result. You might want to set environment variable `OMP_NUM_THREADS=1` to prevents OpenMP from automatically starting multiple threads. ### Examining the Profiling File The tool we used to examine the profiling file generated by `perftools` is [`pprof`](https://github.com/google/pprof), which provides a Web-based GUI like `cprofilev`. We can rely on the standard Go toolchain to retrieve the source code of `pprof` and build it: ```bash go get github.com/google/pprof ``` Then we can use it to profile `main.py.prof` generated in the previous section: ```bash pprof -http=0.0.0.0:3213 `which python` ./main.py.prof ``` Where `-http` specifies the IP and port of the HTTP service. Directing our Web browser to the service, we would see something like the following: ![result](./pprof_1.png) ### Identifying the Performance Bottlenecks Similar to how we work with `cprofilev`, we'd focus on `tottime` and `cumtime`. ![kernel_perf](./pprof_2.png) We can see that the execution time of multiplication and the computing of the gradient of multiplication takes 2% to 4% of the total running time, and `MomentumOp` takes about 17%. Obviously, we'd want to optimize `MomentumOp`. `pprof` would mark performance critical parts of the program in red. It's a good idea to follow the hints.