提交 a08bcccc 编写于 作者: B Bodo Möller

Expand expspeed.c to make BN_kronecker timings.

This caused a segmentation fault in calls to malloc, so I cleaned up
bn_lib.c a little so that it is easier to see what is going on.
The bug turned out to be an off-by-one error in BN_bin2bn.
上级 bdec3c53
......@@ -3,6 +3,9 @@
Changes between 0.9.6 and 0.9.7 [xx XXX 2000]
*) BN_bin2bn bugfix (off-by-one error).
[Bodo Moeller]
*) Make BN_mod_inverse faster by explicitly handling small quotients
in the Euclid loop. (Speed gain about 20% for small moduli [256 or
512 bits], about 30% for larger ones [1024 or 2048 bits].)
......
......@@ -510,6 +510,7 @@ void bn_dump1(FILE *o, const char *a, const BN_ULONG *b,int n);
#define BN_F_BN_CTX_NEW 106
#define BN_F_BN_DIV 107
#define BN_F_BN_EXPAND2 108
#define BN_F_BN_EXPAND_INTERNAL 120
#define BN_F_BN_MOD_EXP2_MONT 118
#define BN_F_BN_MOD_EXP_MONT 109
#define BN_F_BN_MOD_EXP_MONT_WORD 117
......
......@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ static ERR_STRING_DATA BN_str_functs[]=
{ERR_PACK(0,BN_F_BN_CTX_NEW,0), "BN_CTX_new"},
{ERR_PACK(0,BN_F_BN_DIV,0), "BN_div"},
{ERR_PACK(0,BN_F_BN_EXPAND2,0), "bn_expand2"},
{ERR_PACK(0,BN_F_BN_EXPAND_INTERNAL,0), "BN_EXPAND_INTERNAL"},
{ERR_PACK(0,BN_F_BN_MOD_EXP2_MONT,0), "BN_mod_exp2_mont"},
{ERR_PACK(0,BN_F_BN_MOD_EXP_MONT,0), "BN_mod_exp_mont"},
{ERR_PACK(0,BN_F_BN_MOD_EXP_MONT_WORD,0), "BN_mod_exp_mont_word"},
......
......@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ BIGNUM *BN_new(void)
/* This is used both by bn_expand2() and bn_dup_expand() */
/* The caller MUST check that words > b->dmax before calling this */
static BN_ULONG *internal_bn_expand(const BIGNUM *b, int words)
static BN_ULONG *bn_expand_internal(const BIGNUM *b, int words)
{
BN_ULONG *A,*a = NULL;
const BN_ULONG *B;
......@@ -315,13 +315,13 @@ static BN_ULONG *internal_bn_expand(const BIGNUM *b, int words)
bn_check_top(b);
if (BN_get_flags(b,BN_FLG_STATIC_DATA))
{
BNerr(BN_F_BN_EXPAND2,BN_R_EXPAND_ON_STATIC_BIGNUM_DATA);
BNerr(BN_F_BN_EXPAND_INTERNAL,BN_R_EXPAND_ON_STATIC_BIGNUM_DATA);
return(NULL);
}
a=A=(BN_ULONG *)OPENSSL_malloc(sizeof(BN_ULONG)*(words+1));
if (A == NULL)
{
BNerr(BN_F_BN_EXPAND2,ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE);
BNerr(BN_F_BN_EXPAND_INTERNAL,ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE);
return(NULL);
}
#if 1
......@@ -329,70 +329,6 @@ static BN_ULONG *internal_bn_expand(const BIGNUM *b, int words)
/* Check if the previous number needs to be copied */
if (B != NULL)
{
#if 0
/* This lot is an unrolled loop to copy b->top
* BN_ULONGs from B to A
*/
/*
* I have nothing against unrolling but it's usually done for
* several reasons, namely:
* - minimize percentage of decision making code, i.e. branches;
* - avoid cache trashing;
* - make it possible to schedule loads earlier;
* Now let's examine the code below. The cornerstone of C is
* "programmer is always right" and that's what we love it for:-)
* For this very reason C compilers have to be paranoid when it
* comes to data aliasing and assume the worst. Yeah, but what
* does it mean in real life? This means that loop body below will
* be compiled to sequence of loads immediately followed by stores
* as compiler assumes the worst, something in A==B+1 style. As a
* result CPU pipeline is going to starve for incoming data. Secondly
* if A and B happen to share same cache line such code is going to
* cause severe cache trashing. Both factors have severe impact on
* performance of modern CPUs and this is the reason why this
* particular piece of code is #ifdefed away and replaced by more
* "friendly" version found in #else section below. This comment
* also applies to BN_copy function.
*
* <appro@fy.chalmers.se>
*/
for (i=b->top&(~7); i>0; i-=8)
{
A[0]=B[0]; A[1]=B[1]; A[2]=B[2]; A[3]=B[3];
A[4]=B[4]; A[5]=B[5]; A[6]=B[6]; A[7]=B[7];
A+=8;
B+=8;
}
switch (b->top&7)
{
case 7:
A[6]=B[6];
case 6:
A[5]=B[5];
case 5:
A[4]=B[4];
case 4:
A[3]=B[3];
case 3:
A[2]=B[2];
case 2:
A[1]=B[1];
case 1:
A[0]=B[0];
case 0:
/* I need the 'case 0' entry for utrix cc.
* If the optimizer is turned on, it does the
* switch table by doing
* a=top&7
* a--;
* goto jump_table[a];
* If top is 0, this makes us jump to 0xffffffc
* which is rather bad :-(.
* eric 23-Apr-1998
*/
;
}
#else
for (i=b->top>>2; i>0; i--,A+=4,B+=4)
{
/*
......@@ -413,9 +349,11 @@ static BN_ULONG *internal_bn_expand(const BIGNUM *b, int words)
case 3: A[2]=B[2];
case 2: A[1]=B[1];
case 1: A[0]=B[0];
case 0: ; /* ultrix cc workaround, see above */
case 0: /* workaround for ultrix cc: without 'case 0', the optimizer does
* the switch table by doing a=top&3; a--; goto jump_table[a];
* which fails for top== 0 */
;
}
#endif
}
/* Now need to zero any data between b->top and b->max */
......@@ -453,7 +391,7 @@ BIGNUM *bn_dup_expand(const BIGNUM *b, int words)
if (words > b->dmax)
{
BN_ULONG *a = internal_bn_expand(b, words);
BN_ULONG *a = bn_expand_internal(b, words);
if (a)
{
......@@ -472,7 +410,7 @@ BIGNUM *bn_dup_expand(const BIGNUM *b, int words)
}
}
/* If a == NULL, there was an error in allocation in
internal_bn_expand(), and NULL should be returned */
bn_expand_internal(), and NULL should be returned */
}
else
{
......@@ -491,11 +429,12 @@ BIGNUM *bn_expand2(BIGNUM *b, int words)
{
if (words > b->dmax)
{
BN_ULONG *a = internal_bn_expand(b, words);
BN_ULONG *a = bn_expand_internal(b, words);
if (a)
{
OPENSSL_free(b->d);
if (b->d)
OPENSSL_free(b->d);
b->d=a;
b->dmax=words;
}
......@@ -547,7 +486,7 @@ BIGNUM *BN_copy(BIGNUM *a, const BIGNUM *b)
case 3: A[2]=B[2];
case 2: A[1]=B[1];
case 1: A[0]=B[0];
case 0: ; /* ultrix cc workaround, see comments in bn_expand2 */
case 0: ; /* ultrix cc workaround, see comments in bn_expand_internal */
}
#else
memcpy(a->d,b->d,sizeof(b->d[0])*b->top);
......@@ -666,7 +605,7 @@ BIGNUM *BN_bin2bn(const unsigned char *s, int len, BIGNUM *ret)
return(NULL);
i=((n-1)/BN_BYTES)+1;
m=((n-1)%(BN_BYTES));
ret->top=i;
ret->top=i-1;
while (n-- > 0)
{
l=(l<<8L)| *(s++);
......
......@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@
/* determine timings for modexp, gcd, or modular inverse */
#define TEST_EXP
#undef TEST_GCD
#undef TEST_KRON
#undef TEST_INV
......@@ -220,7 +221,7 @@ void do_mul_exp(BIGNUM *r, BIGNUM *a, BIGNUM *b, BIGNUM *c, BN_CTX *ctx)
double tm;
long num;
#if defined(TEST_EXP) + defined(TEST_GCD) + defined(TEST_INV) != 1
#if defined(TEST_EXP) + defined(TEST_GCD) + defined(TEST_KRON) + defined(TEST_INV) != 1
# error "choose one test"
#endif
......@@ -253,7 +254,11 @@ void do_mul_exp(BIGNUM *r, BIGNUM *a, BIGNUM *b, BIGNUM *c, BN_CTX *ctx)
#elif defined(TEST_GCD)
if (!BN_gcd(r,a,b,ctx)) goto err;
if (!BN_gcd(r,b,c,ctx)) goto err;
if (!BN_gcd(r,b,c,ctx)) goto err;
if (!BN_gcd(r,c,a,ctx)) goto err;
#elif defined(TEST_KRON)
if (-2 == BN_kronecker(a,b,ctx)) goto err;
if (-2 == BN_kronecker(b,c,ctx)) goto err;
if (-2 == BN_kronecker(c,a,ctx)) goto err;
#else /* TEST_INV */
if (!BN_mod_inverse(r,a,c,ctx)) goto err;
if (!BN_mod_inverse(r,b,c,ctx)) goto err;
......@@ -265,6 +270,8 @@ void do_mul_exp(BIGNUM *r, BIGNUM *a, BIGNUM *b, BIGNUM *c, BN_CTX *ctx)
"modexp %4d ^ %4d %% %4d"
#elif defined(TEST_GCD)
"3*gcd %4d %4d %4d"
#elif defined(TEST_KRON)
"3*kronecker %4d %4d %4d"
#else /* TEST_INV */
"2*inv %4d %4d mod %4d"
#endif
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册