提交 64790791 编写于 作者: A Andy Polyakov

Commentary update.

上级 cee73df3
......@@ -44,8 +44,10 @@
# improvement [I had to test it], while final Intel P4 performance
# achieves respectful 432MBps on 2.8GHz processor now. For reference.
# If executed on Xeon, current RC4_CHAR code-path is 2.7x faster than
# RC4_INT code-path. While if executed on Opteron, it's is only 25%
# slower than the latter...
# RC4_INT code-path. While if executed on Opteron, it's only 25%
# slower slower than the RC4_INT one [meaning that if detecting CPU
# is not desired, then RC4_CHAR code-path should be preferred, as it
# provides better *all-round* performance].
$output=shift;
open STDOUT,"| $^X ../perlasm/x86_64-xlate.pl $output";
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册